re: #535 Mark Winter

I though we had already established that at least it was no rape case.

According to Sweden’s laws, not rape. What it would be in the US is not known. Please take the time to read the link I provided.

But if you insist on taboo (which I understand), shouldn’t at least some discretion apply when it comes to the accused? Does he have no rights, at least until files are charged against him?

Two wrongs don’t make a right. And you are concluding, repeatedly, that the woman is unstrustworthy, that she’s making a false charge. Can you explain why you’re willing to do so based on the limited and confused stories provided?