re: #550 austin_blue

So are you saying that a billion dead in 100 years is more acceptable than a billion dead in 11? Granted that the plan would be different, but still, a billion people. That’s more than have been killed in the history of human conflict.

Not by any means. I haven’t even said I agree with that assessment.

My point was that even if I did accept the poster’s estimate of 50-120 as being accurate, a completely different plan would be in order than one for an 11 year plan. Obama’s techno-czar or whatever (Holdren) wants policies to reflect the 11 year possibility.

Is that clearer?