Well he could have just said that we should not be subsidizing the use of food crops like corn to make fuel and then I would have agreed. But since he has turned it into an analogy of the holocaust and equated it with genocide I think I’ll have to pass on my agreeing with him.

Reasoned and direct argument is becoming an entirely lost art I fear, it is being universally replaced with impassioned hyperbolic appeals to emotion. I keep hoping that someday soon a politician realizes that some of us are actually listening and will support valid appeals to reason.