re: #554 Buck

Sometimes the audio is removed from the videos because of two person consent laws. Sometimes they are just edited for time. However no one has shown that the transcripts change what the ACORN employee actually said versus the video.

For example, the woman saying on video that they could lie on their tax form is not shown on the transcript to be against lying on a tax form.

1. ‘Two person consent laws’ apply to secretly and illegally taping a conversation?

2. ‘Edited for time’? This is their big scoop showing that ACORN helps pimps import little girls from Latin America and they had to ‘edit for time’.

3. We don’t have the full raw tapes, because they won’t release them. Period. Why won’t they allow a third party to examine their ‘evidence’?