re: #578 lawhawk

Refuses to target ISIL?

Carson can’t possibly be serious. That’s so easily debunked as to not be worthy of more than a link or 100.

Or, is he thinking that ISIS and ISIL are different entities, which is something that the ignorant would do anyways.

If anything it shows just how fact-challenged Carson is, and that his followers are even more so if they buy into that baffling BS.

I saw somw wingnut link on FB last week that said Obama’s calling them ‘ISIL’ instead of ‘ISIS’ betrays his Seekrit Mooslim sympathies or something.