re: #34 Great White Snark

Apart from what I read here or accidentally run across in general, I’m not even well versed in the GOP talking points. I avoid the talking heads and don’t read GOP sites. My usual news on TV is BBC and Al Jaz. The bandwagon was self declared by a couple people to me here a week or two ago. Would you posit that does not exist here? That this particular board is not largely pro Clinton? How do I get the discussion above opposing Hilary=supporting GOP policy? Looking at some reactions, that’s not going well.

Opposing Hilary even for reasons that may (or may not point by point) lean right does not equate to GOP support.

Here is what I’m looking for-An economic conservative that will work damn hard on a domestic economy focus, and work to reduce corporate influence in policy making. A middle class focus for once. How far from that can I go and hold my nose? Gonna have to wait and see the post primary landscape to decide. I’m not interested in any isolationists.

I would never say the board is not pro Clinton. To me the leap is saying everyone is a riding a bandwagon.

Realistically we really only get two choices. Clearly many think there is one. That is not riding being on a band wagon. It is the reality of the situation and the times. At least for what we know right now.

I should would like to know though, how you view Hillary if she isn’t a moderate. I can understand if she doesn’t fit your want of an economic wiz, but I really do not understand how she is not moderate, all things considered.

And I would totally understand if you do not want to define her.

Again sorry if I read you wrong. I am pretty sure you at least understand how I made the mistake of seeing your comment in the light of the typical GOP criticism of her.

Anyone would have to be living under a rock to not see the GOP portrays her as the most evil, liberal, feminist socialist commie ever!