re: #54 stone

That’s probably right. I thought 50 contacts was a pretty conservative number, but whatever. The point is just that the number of people covered is much larger than 300, and without more precise data I’m not sure we can make an informed decision whether the number is something we should be comfortable with or not.

Honestly, really honestly, how much time have you spent over the past year talking about other 4th amendment violations, and which ones?