Comment

Another Stealth Creationist Bill in Missouri

602
pre-Boomer Marine brat2/19/2009 1:43:50 pm PST

re: #558 Dragonwolf

How is it subjective? I observed how many people respond to science the same way they do to religion. And that some (not all by any means) leaders of the scientific community expect acceptance without direct observation proof.

For reference: the original wording was “the religion of current beliefs”

Defining it as a religion is what’s subjective.

Which “leaders of the scientific community expect acceptance without direct observation proof.” Names?