re: #39 LudwigVanQuixote

Then I missed them. repost here and take your thrashing. Bagua for all of your piety about what you think scientific integrity should be, you better bloody well know that when you claim someone is distorting things you had better be able to back it up.

It is like a yo yo with you. Sometimes reasonable and then sometimes with the unbacked up snark.

I am calling you to hear and now to back up your claims. I am sick and tired of you discrediting true things.

Back it up now or loose my respect for good.

Ludwig,

I’m not interested in your being sick and tired, nor did I challenge a single aspect of the science, I challenged the rhetorical argument made by Sinclair in the last video (not the one in this thread.) Those arguments should be debated in that thread and you should calm down.

Also, you are a bit of the yo-yo yourself, you made very good points in that thread, stayed on firm scientific grounds and avoided emotional insults, I complimented you on that content and did not dispute one word of what you said as I recall. If your argument that Mr. Sinclair and you are equals as scientists then I am confused.

While I was typing you just said:

Back up your claims about the science. I am really sick of you pulling this shit.

I never made claims about “the science,” I was commenting on the examples Sinclair used and how he worded his arguments. At the time of that thread you found nothing in my posts to object to, so why the hysteria now?