re: #609 Buck

I said: “The only way to prove that Zimmerman was not injured in anyway is to refute the multiple witnesses on the scene.”

I then made even clearer that the witnesses I was referring to was the “officers and paramedics on the scene”. And that if they did need to be refuted, that is to say they did match and were both lies, then that “would point to a much wider conspiracy that I am willing to entertain at this time.”

Again context of the thread matters. Also it counts that I have been clear about the lack of real evidence throughout this thread. And that makes me wait for the actual evidence or finding of the authorities before making judgement.

So, I was supposed to take from the post that it was in context of the thread up until now and so assume you meant that you were supposing that the paramedics had treated Zimmerman. A bit of a stretch, but I’ll go with it.

We’ve not addressed the unreliability of witness testimony, particularly when the witnesses have been led by the authorities. When I have two witnesses who say that their testimony was led by questions and “corrections,” am I to assume that only their testimony is in question and the rest reliable enough to draw conclusions?