re: #51 iceweasel

What can I tell you. You sniffed that Taibbi’s journalism was on a level with the National Enquirer; I provided you links and quotes proving he’s earned the highest honour possible from the industry, and so now you want to just impugn the whole magazine industry.

When you decide where you want to leave the goalposts, let me know so I can score another touchdown again.
BTW, glad you’re liking peep show! hee.

Well worded my weasel, touche!

But in National Enquirer I’m not saying that level compared to other magazines in general, but in comparing Rolling Stone content to a real financial journal the gap is, yes that large.

And I’m not talking about the whole magazine industry, rather the popular press such as Time, and Newsweek, and NYT, and LAT, who definitely report the news with a political slant, as well as general laziness and in the case of the financial markets, clueless-ness.

And Rolling Stones? Their view of the economy and politics is hardly mainstream. They represent the freak agenda.