re: #576 Aceofwhat?

I just explained it, and what I believe he meant. We’ve been through debates here where Danny Glover sounded half drunk, half retarded, and many bent over backwards to give him the benefit of the doubt, which I agree too. My point is if there is a seemingly more innocuous or salient point to be made, isn’t it fair to give the benefit of the doubt instead of immediately jumping to worse case scenario, or does that depend on who says it?