re: #61 NukeAtomrod

I don’t know, but I doubt it. You don’t need a conspiracy for one guy to shoot another unarmed guy in a church. Scott Roeder alone was adequate manpower to commit the crime. What role would the conspirators have? Buying the bullets? Giving him a ride to the church? If he was a part of a group that encouraged his crime, wouldn’t they want to take credit once he achieved their goal?

Not if they wanted to stay free to encourge others to do it…