re: #643 tradewind

Of course, he’s a minister, so this could have been interpreted as interfering with the separation interpretation of the Establishment clause, but hey… who’s keeping score? That’s only applicable to Wal*Mart shoppers.

It wasn’t a religous event. Nor was it a partisan/political event, as Beck said his wasn’t either. Just a march honoring Dr. King’s speech. What’s wrong with that?

Saying “it could have been interpreted as” and then adding a ridiculous interpretation is a cute rhetorical device. Yes, it “could have been interpreted as” a interfering with the Establishment clause, but only if you are an insane person. By a rational mind, it cannot.