re: #64 Kefirah

but this isn’t collateral. this goes to the heart of his philosophy and praxis as a journalist and hate.mongerer, which IS precisely what has us all up in arms.

if he got it and edited it, he’s culpable as a race.baiter.

if he got it as an edited snippet and didn’t do the necessary research + fact.checking before throwing it out into the baiting ring as fodder for the rabidly slavering hoards, he’s a race.baiter.

I’m with you on this, but why aren’t you with me? Why accuse without proof, when the consequence could be to give him an excuse to claim victimhood?