re: #63 Bagua

So do you concede it is an exaggeration or you still insist it is accurate?

It’s as accurate as any statement like that could be.

There is overwhelming evidence of AGW, based on solid science— including the very simply physics of CO2 action in atmosphere.

There is overwhelming evidence for Darwinian evolution— including the very precise molecular action of DNA and RNA, which wasn’t actually connected to evolution until the modern synthesis.

There is overwhelming statistical, data-driven evidence linking lung cancer and smoking, even though we lack a full understanding of how cancer operates in cells.