and in any case, scientific “facts” are always changing and with the rapid technological changes taking place, I imagine we’ll be able to better test the validity of our past conclusions and our future hypothesis. As the doctor stated, 15 years ago the debate was different. Factors were unknown about HIV and Aids. Today there are factors that are unknown. There is much debate about testing for HIV. The standards change from country to country. The markers accepted for the diagnosis of HIV are different from one country to the next. You could be classified as having in one country and not having it in another. Certainly that leaves a bit of uncertainty, and leaves the discussion open to different theories. Wouldn’t you agree?