re: #67 No Malarkey!

To be completely accurate, what he is claiming is that he is immune from civil suit for the defamatory statements he made about Carroll while he was President. Trump of course helpfully repeated those defamatory statements recently, allowing her to sue him for defamation again and eliminating any immunity defense he was claiming.

Ah, okay. I thought he was including the rape finding in there, since that occurred well before he was President.