Comment

Holder Defends 9/11 Trial Decision

684
Mad Prophet Ludwig11/18/2009 1:17:27 pm PST

re: #675 Spare O’Lake

The “inalienable rights” of the civilian inhabitants of Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Dresden did not cloak them with immunity from brutal, merciless mass death in time of war.
The wartime enemy has no such rights, unless you are prepared to retroactively ban war and rewrite history.
Tool that you are.

To repeat, you are completely off base.

What about the courts martials in the Phillipines? We convicted our own men for doing it - in time of war, against irregular troops, who were captured on the battlefield . In otherwords, as far as UCMJ is concerned, we have already convicted our own people for doing these things to others who fit the same bill as these men.