re: #666 Charles

No, you are not correct. I’m pointing out the sheer hypocrisy of these people, who were perfectly fine with letting a radical Islamist into Notre Dame, but blow their gaskets over the legally elected President of the United States.

And these particular people are dangerous kooks tied to radical groups, by the way. In my view, they have no “moral authority” at all.

Charles — but were they “perfectly fine” with letting the guy into Notre Dame? You make a big assumption there. After all, I have been involved in the pro-life movement for years, but have never participated in the any activities to raise money for breast cancer research. Does that mean I am “perfectly fine with women dying of breast cancer”? Or does it mean that I have chosen to focus my energies on an issue other than breast cancer?

Besides, your response above makes it sound like you think there is something wrong with protesting “the legally elected President of the United States”. Be careful lest you start sounding like those who argue that disagreeing with Obama is treason.