re: #15 Prof. Backpfeifengesicht, PhD

No, the immediate context shows that he was referring to the vaccines/autism link.

Why the hell don’t people admit the report was blurry at best and save everyone from all the hair splitting. This is a big part of the damn problem.

Good journalism is based on good writing backed by facts. Looks to me like no one looked into anything before putting the story up. They seem to want to spend all the time covering their asses and hoping people on the ‘net help cover for them.

It’s bassackwards.