I’ve come to the conclusion that LGF has some hidden quota of crap-stirrers. The nicks and names change, but the format and style of argument doesn’t vary. Hair splitting, ignoring context, claims of innocence regarding whether they did or did not read an article before opining or quoting it, and stubbornness defending irrational talking points that would impress a mule.

(Off to read something non-repetitive since this daily runaround is frankly boring as hell.)