re: #677 Charles

Yes, religious fanatic is what I said.

I’d like to explore this a bit further.

Charles, in my opinion a religious fanatic is someone who straps a bomb to their child and sends them off to get on a bus full of Jewish kids and remote detonates their child believing the child will go to heaven for killing Jews.

That’s a religious fanatic, would you agree?

I on the other hand simply have a different belief system than you (and apparently quite a few on here), yet I force nothing on you, nor do I want to take evolution away from you (or from schools, just think it should be presented differently or made optional in K-12). I would even go as far to dare to say that I’m probably the most agreeable creationist you’ve ever not banned. I do not to ban evolution nor keep others from pursuing the study of it.

I do not present any harm to you, and desire not to force you to accept my faith. I simply share my faith through words and at the end of it all I consider you a patriot and man of truth.

So to you I’m a religious fanatic?

It’s laughable that you’re talking about “tolerance,” when in a previous thread you told us that everyone who doesn’t believe what you do is doomed to burn in eternal torment.

My beliefs are neither tolerant nor intolerant because my beliefs cannot prejudice you. My actions could be intolerant but my beliefs cannot. I have neither caused you to lose liberty nor persecuted you for your beliefs. I do not even desire you any ill-will whatsoever. However, you have shown intolerance towards those who are not of the same beliefs as you. I’m not trying to hack you off but your disdain for creationist oozes from the site. You have shown however a measure of tolerance of me specifically by not banning me (yet).