re: #59 LudwigVanQuixote

His approach to this whole topic, and thread, is out of the classic creationist playbook. Namely, through up a bunch of terms, sounds impressive… , and then jumble them all up.

It’s my belief that anyone can get a good understanding of AGW, if they spend the time.

But some people would rather flail.

My standard rejoinder, as seen above, is to request that somebody to give me a good one or two paragraph explanation of why the earth and the moon have different average surface temperatures. If they can do that then I feel they have a sound practical understanding of physics.