re: #720 Sharmuta

No one’s comprehension is the issue here- you used exclusionary language and seem to have a poor ability to make your points.

It would seem you have a need to defend your fellow downdinger. He clearly made a weak attack and instead of admitting his error decided to continue down a path into the pathetically challenged.

I made no generalization about what a fanatic was, I gave a specific example of what I would call a fanatic. If you want to agree with your reading impared friend, then that’s your choice.