Comment

Absurd Anti-Evolution Lawsuit Denied by Supreme Court

731
Aye Pod3/24/2009 1:13:47 pm PDT

re: #727 jimc

It is but it still is most apt.

When applied to you, yes.

OK, moron, my statement:

my opinion a religious fanatic is someone who straps a bomb to their child and sends them off to get on a bus full of Jewish kids and remote detonates their child believing the child will go to heaven for killing Jews.


Does that exclude Jim Jones? David Koresh? etc etc.? No it doesn’t .

YES IT DOES! Saying a religious fanatic is X can only be read as a definition. You did not say ‘X is an example of a religious fanatic’. And given that you were trying to defend yourself against the accusation of being a fanatic, what would be the point anyway of merely giving an example of another kind of fanatic? We all know that religious fanatics come in many flavours. You aren’t kidding anyone.