re: #742 Walter L. Newton

Whatever.

Heh. Can you try to explain why you think liturgical language is what defines ‘Beckian’, rather than the actual content of what he says? Because I’m really at a loss as to why you think MLK sounds ‘Beckian’. Apparently every religious figure in the world is Beckian, to you. So I’m wondering why you’ve perceived the criticism of Beck in such a very, very narrow way.

Or is that going to make you sleepy?