re: #73 Nyet

From what I’ve read so far by the legal professionals, the chances of a criminal prosecution are not very good at this stage. But maybe further calls come to light.

There was initial speculation that he could have violated Georgia’s election statutes by attempting to coerce Raffensperger, but the legal takes I’ve been reading this morning have been saying that Trump has to have known that he was telling Raffensperger to alter a valid count of votes, and it could be argued - based on the level of detail that Trump himself stated on the call, exact numbers, etc. - that he genuinely believes that the count stated by Georgia officials is false, which would open a defense.