Oh, wow, so-called “common sense”/”forensic” types of arguments come up at GoV now. I’m very well acquainted with them, having studied the Holocaust and Katyn denials.

Vortac said…

OK, he killed 90 persons, meaning he probably wounded two times many. That’s at least 270 rounds. Let’s assume he was an excellent marksman and that he was on target with every third or fourth bullet and that he didn’t use burst or auto fire. The man carried about 1000 rounds of ammunition with him? That’s about 15 kilograms of ammunition only (5.56 cal), almost 20kg if he used something bigger, like 7.62. However, pictures of him during the shooting show him without any backpacks or large bags. He carried 1000 rounds in his pockets?