re: #790 Obdicut

Not in my opinion, you didn’t. You argued well enough, but the point about the expansion of the scope is not dismissable.

not dismissable. just explained. the dissent agrees that the narrower constitutional points were rightly dismissed and then they sort of hiccup.

the broader point was all that remained. and it’s senseless to make an ‘as-applies ruling when it would apply across the board anyway as a result.

i received no coherent response to those points. happy to pick it up where we left off, though!