re: #71 RogueOne

Why do we have to start with the assumption that a person who has bought a DVD is a potential criminal? That’s where I was going with the car analogy. The fact that a person “might” break the law shouldn’t restrict what we’re legally entitled to do with our own property.

Then why do we have DUI check points? Because the assumptions can be backed up with actual facts. We know for a fact that a lot of people ripe off media of all sorts.

That’s not assumptions, that’s facts. Just like DUI, we know it happens enough to assume that we have to be proactive.

I have no problem with that.