re: #79 BigPapa

That’s the odd thing that a lot of deniers do not want to debate and when they do they inevitably end up in Alex Jones territory pretty soon: their arguments neccessarily have to assume that standard contemporary scientific methods are ultimatively flawed and that pretty much the entirety of the scientific institutions are corrupt through and through by not admitting to the flawed methods and the consequentially flawed results and flawed conclusions – because they being flawed is supposedly obvious enough to be understood even by the layperson. It’s a conspiracy theory of epic proportions, which is why shills like Mr Lakely choose to evade questions about the reality of the actual scientifc community.