Comment

Holder Defends 9/11 Trial Decision

824
captdiggs11/18/2009 3:37:17 pm PST

re: #815 karmic_inquisitor

The evidence …

It is tainted by not making counsel available to the accused at the time of questioning and not warning the accused of self incrimination. There is also the question of warrants and search and seizure. Those are pretty much inviolable standards of the US civilian court system.

I can’t wait to see how they square away all the constitutional violations of his “arrest”…his spending years in Gitmo without trial ( ie. no speedy trial), alleged “torture”, no bail hearing, as well as those you mentioned.
All of which would get a common criminal’s motion to dismiss, granted.

I can’t see how they can get a conviction without actually ignoring at least some constitutional guarantees.