re: #828 Obdicut

re: #825 sattv4u2

Hee hee. That’s hilarious.

I’m not sure what you actually need defined. He didn’t state a time period. As he’s clarified, he assumed a time period was, well, assumed, because the question doesn’t actually make any sense otherwise— as I pointed out as well, with the bit about the French Revolution.

So see? It can be answered very well (as opposed to very very well) with NO time period as you demonstrated

SO ,, as time period should NOT have been “assumed”!

Thanks for agreeing with the answereres!