re: #81 wrenchwench

That headline was bad and your preface was worse.

And the article doesn’t actually include a link to a transcript, so it’s just a bunch of clipped quotes.

But doubtless the short, spammed-across-multiple-sites summary is an effective description of what was said. It’s not like science coverage doesn’t routinely carve out the details or something.

But hey, I’m sure the author who spent twenty years studying the biology of development of skin color in humans is just being a Luddite, and the whole thing can be dismissed offhand.