re: #829 Bagua

That is correspondence not verification, and no, it does not “match closely”.

Also a lie.

When making outrageous claims about science one should be abe to back those things up with facts and data.

Again, this is basic science which you obviously do not even begin to think is worth your time to bring to a science discussion. Bring data of your own. Simply saying you think something is some way over and over does not cut it. You are wrong about what you think and in any case, you need to be able to support your claims.

You never even try. Then you have the chutzpah to lecture others on what science is, when you do not follow even the most basic rules of it.

Simply shouting your lies over and over does not make them true.