re: #861 torrentprime

Not even a little bit.

The way I read it, he seems to think that no such amendment to the constitution is necessary, that he would allow a majority vote to be held to remove or restrict the rights of the minority despite not only US Constitutional protections but DC legislative law that specifically forbids such discriminatory referendums.

read it more closely. that’s not what it says. it says the process so far has been fine and petitioners will not lose all future avenues in which to potentially challenge the act, so petitioners should go pound salt.

help me see what you saw-