re: #874 torrentprime

lol / yes

you’re right to laugh…i’m slower than usual today for some reason/

Their specific argument is that there are two conflicting issues:
1.) Human rights-related provisions cannot be blocked by referendum.
2.) Legislation from #1 MAY violate the DC charter.

Roberts said that the argument for #2 “may have some force”, which is judge for “may or may not prevail”.

You are reading far, far too much into a clear attempt NOT to prejudge the question of potential future litigation, an answer was unnecessary to the resolution of the item at hand.

Good, solid work on Roberts’ part.

Anything else i can help with!?!