re: #87 Jay C

And, disgracefully, would probably still garner >40% of the vote….

Though “Trump 2024” might not be that much of a total fantasy (nightmare scenario, though: yes) - while the provisions of the 22nd Amendment are pretty clear:

it makes no mention of a specific consecutive-term requirement, i.e. the “Grover Cleveland” scenario is still a Constitutional possibility. Though - disgustingly - the incumbent POTUS is the only one covered in that circumstance….

Jimmy Carter is on line 2, and he’s in a bad mood.