re: #85 calochortus

And that’s probably because it’s a stupid argument to start with. Transwomen’s experience isn’t exactly like mine so they’re not women? Ms. Rowling’s experience isn’t exactly like mine either. Both of which differ from, say, my next door neighbor’s experience. Does that mean only one of us is a “real” woman?

And that’s why I was disagreeing with your original assumption. Candace may be writing sentences that look like she’s arguing only women can do those things, but what she’s actually writing is that those things define what a woman is.