I wasn’t clear on whether “he sided with” refers to in his capacity as the State’s AG, or if he used to be in private practice and those were his clients. If it’s the latter, the ad is unfair. Repulsive defendants have as much right to representation as anybody else, the whole system depends on it, and I can’t criticize someone for taking those cases. If it’s the former, he’s sleazy as fuck and deserves for it be an issue.