Be nice if he:

1) Were intellectually honest enough to leave comments he disagreed with,
2) Went back more then 20 years in his charts,
and
3) Stopped picking on where people work — this is science, if it is verifiable and repeatable then what does it matter where anyone works? It only demonstrates a fundamental weakness in the warming communities evidence when this is their fallback argument. It is very hard to sell a computer model as your main evidence, even harder when none of them predicted the drop after the 1998 spike. Even government funded scientists worry about where the money is coming from so stop it with that!
David