re: #891 drcordell

I haven’t read through all of the latest developments in the case. But from what I have read, this whole controversy is much ado about nothing. AGW exists, and there is more than enough data to support that conclusion. Why are we even debating this?

I see, another uninformed critic. LOL.

Anyone sensibly informed knows that the Parliamentary Inquiry is not about whether “AGW exists” or not.

What is amusing is that no single aspect of AGW can be discussed here without these resorts to faith based statements on AGW. It is always about whether one “believes in AGW” or is a “denier”. This is evidence that what we are discussing is a matter of faith, and not science.