re: #908 Klaatu

“teachers shall be permitted to help students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of theories of biological and chemical evolution.”

Funny but I thought understanding, analyzing, critiquing, and reviewing were the basis of science.

What is the problem with this? Are certain theories closed off to further analysis?

You sound like Al Gore when he says there is no debate to be had on Global Warming.

You’ve been registered almost a year, yet only now do you make your first post without apparently having read anything previously on the subject.

The simple response to you is that apparently you would also advocate the teaching of astrology next to astronomy, YEC next to all science, alchemy next to chemistry and so on.

At what point would you suggest not teaching what is known to be wrong to children who don’t know the difference?