re: #927 Slumbering Behemoth

Don’t play these stupid games with me. Having separate sets of authoritative legal systems in the same country that apply to different demographics of people based on religion, race, or anything of that nature sets up a “separate but equal” legal system. That is what I was getting at.

Huh? You need to take a deep breath — I’m not particularly interested in what you’re getting at, since you’re obviously wrong. As has been pointed out again and again in this thread, in an arbitration court both parties must consent to be judged. What is profoundly stupid is your “separate but equal” comparison, since segregation laws obviously didn’t require consent of the segregated.

On, and another idiotic argument is to keep citing Sharia laws that are plainly incompatible with Britain’s legal system, such as stoning punishment for homosexuals. The truth is you don’t have a leg to stand on here, and that’s why your arguments, well, suck. As long as rulings are compatible to a countries law, it’s silly to be against arbitration for a specific religion and not others. Period.