re: #952 avanti

I’ll try and stay out of this discussion, but it reminds me of the anti-evolution argument. Ignore the tons of data supporting evolution, and focus on the small errors and unknowns. It seems we are doing the same with AGW. Since the data supports warming, attack the accuracy of some of the data any way possible, and ignore the rest.

That is exactly what Walter is doing only he doesn’t know enough math to even begin to do it. Part of why this is so infuriating is that people on that side are exactly the same as the anti evolution troglodytes in their methods and their pseudo science.