re: #973 Bagua

I challenge anyone to list a “lie” attributed to me. That charge is nonsense.

Are you serious.. OK? let’s look at this very thread shall we?

re: #829 Bagua

That is correspondence not verification, and no, it does not “match closely”.

A lie.

What is amusing is that no single aspect of AGW can be discussed here without these resorts to faith based statements on AGW.

A lie. We talk about science and data all the time - or at keast those who care about science do.

In fact, this is a double lie, since you have yet to ever back up a single of your false claims about the science with any data of your own. Making statements about the nature of the universe without data is called faith. The only one who does that is you and your fellow deniers. The implication that it is others doing so is also a lie.

Then you lied that the inquiry into CRU was the

“scientific community squashing the data”

That is of course an outright lie. What was amusing was this was after you were lying that your intent was to discuss the politics of it, and that the investigation was political. To switch to making the political discussion - which you yourself claimed was political into a suddenly scientific one on the data - was also a type of lie.

So you lied, and you lied about lying and you even lied again that you didn’t lie by posting this insipid challenge. You lied many times on this very thread.

It is insulting that yuo think we are all so stupid that we won’t see it.