LGF

more options

  

Advertisement
50% off Columbia DVD Sale

Britain's Top Judge: Sharia is Just All Right With Me

Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:21:25 pm PDT

The British legal system welcomes its new overlord: Sharia law SHOULD be used in Britain, says UK’s top judge.

The most senior judge in England yesterday gave his blessing to the use of sharia law to resolve disputes among Muslims.

Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips said that Islamic legal principles could be employed to deal with family and marital arguments and to regulate finance.

He declared: ‘Those entering into a contractual agreement can agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.’

In his speech at an East London mosque, Lord Phillips signalled approval of sharia principles as long as punishments - and divorce rulings - complied with the law of the land.

Advertisement

691 comments

  • Comments are open and unmoderated, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Little Green Footballs.
  • Obscene, abusive, silly, or annoying remarks may be deleted, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their views by Little Green Footballs.
  • Posts that contain phone numbers, street addresses, email addresses or other personal information will also be deleted, as will posts that consist only of a variation on the word, "First!"
  • Comments that advocate violence will be cause for immediate banning with no appeal.
  • Disagreement and debate are welcome, but insults and abuse are not, and may cause your account to be blocked.
  • REMEMBER: posting comments at LGF is a privilege, not a right. Abuse that privilege, and your account will be blocked.

Hide comments | Jump to bottom

1 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:23:05pm

Family and marital disputes?

I presume this means stoning for adultery, Your Lordship?(spit)

2 SasquatchOnSteroids  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:23:06pm

Farkin' dhimmi.

3 BignJames  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:23:25pm

The most senior judge in England yesterday gave his blessing to the use of sharia law to resolve disputes among Muslims.


I say bring back dueling.

4 Dustyvet  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:24:00pm

Another nail in Great Britain's coffin?

5 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:24:00pm

And honour killings when the daughter rebels against the father? (a big hoik and spit)

6 Kaitian868  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:24:30pm

One step closer towards the end of the United Kingdom.

7 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:24:47pm

The thin end of a very large wedge.

8 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:25:06pm

Um, take a look at his lordship, and the picture further down of the archbishop, and all is explained. Couple of ex-telephone sanitizers.

9 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:25:13pm

I take it he is volunteering to bag his wife and daughters when they go out to pay the jizya?

10 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:25:17pm

Must be lead in the wig.

11 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:26:18pm

And the Red Queen said,
off with her head!

12 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:27:00pm

i wonder who bought off "lord chief justice lord phillips?"
(and i'm sure he has a standing ticket out of there and a safe place to go.)
i hope we don't let him in.
coward.

13 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:27:02pm
In his speech at an East London mosque, Lord Phillips signalled approval of sharia principles as long as punishments - and divorce rulings - complied with the law of the land.

Uh- they don't, dumbass. I can't imagine anyone who has taken a serious look at shari'a could even think that.

14 winston06  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:27:26pm

I think we should let Eurabians have it now. They want it so bad........

15 gop_patriot  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:27:34pm
Lawyers warned that family and marital disputes settled by sharia could disadvantage women or the vulnerable

You think?!? This judge is not fit for the bench.

In September, Lord Phillips is to leave the post to become the chief Law Lord and President of the new Supreme Court when it opens next year.

And what's this new Supreme Court? Anyone know?

16 Racer X  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:27:51pm
17 Kreuzueber Halbmond  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:28:07pm

I take it he's not kin to Melanie Phillips.

18 eff plus  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:29:12pm

gay.

19 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:30:07pm
In his speech at an East London mosque, Lord Phillips signalled approval of sharia principles as long as punishments - and divorce rulings - complied with the law of the land.

Good luck with that one, King Solomon.

20 sbvft contributor  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:30:58pm

"Appalling" as the Brits would say.

......and where's my hat tip from four threads back :) ?

21 Alouette  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:31:14pm
Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips said that Islamic legal principles could be employed to deal with family and marital arguments

Honour killings, anyone?

22 SasquatchOnSteroids  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:31:25pm

re: #13 Sharmuta

Uh- they don't, dumbass. I can't imagine anyone who has taken a serious look at shari'a could even think that.

And when the first stoning occurs, it'll be the "But,but,they said they wouldn't."
Shocked, he'll be.

23 VegasRick  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:31:29pm

re: #21 Alouette

Honour killings, anyone?

I'll pass.

24 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:31:43pm

This is really troubling. It's elitists like this Lord Judge ignoring the sentiments of his Countrymen, and possibly English common law, that are driving the electorate into the arms of the fascist BNP.

25 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:31:58pm

If we are to take the vocal political voices and media voices of the UK at the face value of all the issues they've spoken of in the last 5 years, it would then appear that the UK is no longer really viable nation and has absolutely no inclination for it's own survival. That is if we accept what the loudmouth's have been saying.

I think it's time for the UK people to embrace freedom and show some testicular fortitude and take back their country from the Socialist interlopers posing as leaders and the media. If they do not then I feel the United States does not have any national interest in maintaining relations with a suicidal sick horse.

26 Timbre  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:32:49pm
Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips

Isn't a Lord times a Lord a bloody fool?

27 joncelli  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:33:25pm

Well, when the other parts of sharia become law he can be a witness to the amputations and beheadings. (Cultural suicide indeed -- we're not just selling them the rope with which to hang us, we're building the scaffold!)

28 Steffan  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:33:42pm

This keeps up much longer, and we'll see pictures of the Queen in a burqa.

How much more ammo are they going to give to the frickin' BNP?

29 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:33:45pm

re: #25 Egfrow

I think it's time for the UK people to embrace freedom and show some testicular fortitude and take back their country from the Socialist interlopers posing as leaders and the media.

The problem is many of them think that only the BNP is the party offering a solution.

30 BignJames  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:34:21pm

re: #20 sbvft contributor

"Appalling" as the Brits would say.

......and where's my hat tip from four threads back :) ?

Here ya go...

31 JammieWearingFool  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:35:24pm
32 6pat6  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:35:27pm
The most senior judge in England yesterday gave his blessing to the use of sharia law to resolve disputes among Muslims.

So, I'm guessing that stonings, "honor killings", and marrying seven-year-old girls is just fine and dandy with this "jurist"? What a jackass! The fact that muslims insist on a dual legal system (to be replaced with Sharia law altogether, eventually!) is simply wrong and must be stopped at all costs! Canada and the UK are capitulating rapidly in the name of multiculturalism and "getting along". They bow to their new overloards and smile as the scimitar is dropped across the back of their collective necks, with the blood of their ancestors uselessly spilled in the Great Wars of the 20th Century for freedom from tyranny, NOT the blaind acceptance of it!

This SOB needs to be removed from the bench, however the Brits accomplish this task legally. He has obviously either lost his mind, or is complicit in the islamic takeover of "Great" Britain.

33 dennisw  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:35:57pm

Hard to believe this is the same mighty England that once ruled over Muslim territories

34 WindHorse  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:35:58pm

what a pompous, arrogant POS (Lord? not even)

35 Kreuzueber Halbmond  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:35:59pm

re: #14 winston06

I think we should let Eurabians have it now. They want it so bad........

I'm sure with a little enlightened reasoning this can all be reversed.

/

36 sbvft contributor  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:36:24pm

re: #30 BignJames

why thank you my good man.

37 Purple Prose  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:37:08pm

I doubt there is another example in all of human history of a culture that is in the ascendent willingly promoting its own destruction and displacement by another and far weaker culture. The West is suicidal. It's not just Europe. The same thing is happening in the US, with CAIR and all the other Islamic groups operating freely and imposing sharia, inch by inch, on the US. The West is the strongest and most successful civilization in the world, yet it is actively engineering its own destruction. Muslims are just doing their thing - they see the weakness and exploit it, because they have clearly defined goals: they imposition of sharia law on the whole world and establishment of a global caliphate. Islam uber alles. Muslims are entirely predictable and could be easily made to choose between assimilation or deportation. But instead the West goes out of its way to aid and abet Islamist goals. Political correctness and multiculturalism are suicide pills.

38 jcm  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:37:44pm

The final sun set continues.

39 dennisw  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:37:45pm

"There's No England Now" --- Cue the Kinks

40 WindHorse  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:38:32pm

Fuck political correctness.

/Mandy off

41 xenon23  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:38:40pm

I miss the days when the PUNKS were the ones taking over Britain.

This is so nuts! I have not been to London since 1995. I was nice then but I remember this Cabby telling all about how the Muslims would come there and party at the hotels doing all the things they could not do back home. I wonder is some of the Muslims miss those days too now that their sharia law has followed them to England.

42 ploome hineni[deleted]  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:39:12pm
43 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:39:40pm

It's time to finish the Revolution of 76 and extinguish the sickness of oppression found in aristocracies, theocracies, collectivism has been proven to maintain submission and high poverty levels for millenniums.

A letter from a man to his wife, this very day, 232 years ago.

Yesterday the greatest Question was decided, which ever was debated in America, and a greater perhaps, never was or will be decided among Men. A Resolution was passed without one dissenting Colony "that these united Colonies, are, and of right ought to be free and independent States, and as such, they have, and of Right ought to have full Power to make War, conclude Peace, establish Commerce, and to do all the other Acts and Things, which other States may rightfully do." You will see in a few days a Declaration setting forth the Causes, which have impell'd Us to this mighty Revolution, and the Reasons which will justify it, in the Sight of God and Man. A Plan of Confederation will be taken up in a few days.

When I look back to the Year 1761, and recollect the Argument concerning Writs of Assistance, in the Superiour Court, which I have hitherto considered as the Commencement of the Controversy, between Great Britain and America, and run through the whole Period from that Time to this, and recollect the series of political Events, the Chain of Causes and Effects, I am surprized at the Suddenness, as well as Greatness of this Revolution. Britain has been fill'd with Folly, and America with Wisdom, at least this is my judgment. -- Time must determine. It is the Will of Heaven, that the two Countries should be sundered forever. It may be the Will of Heaven that America shall suffer Calamities still more wasting and Distresses yet more dreadfull. If this is to be the Case, it will have this good Effect, at least: it will inspire Us with many Virtues, which We have not, and correct many Errors, Follies, and Vices, which threaten to disturb, dishonour, and destroy Us. -- The Furnace of Affliction produces Refinement, in States as well as Individuals. And the new Governments we are assuming, in every Part, will require a Purification from our Vices, and an Augmentation of our Virtues or they will be no Blessings. The People will have unbounded Power. And the People are extremely addicted to Corruption and Venality, as well as the Great.-- But I must submit all my Hopes and Fears, to an overruling Providence, in which, unfashionable [ as] the Faith may be, I firmly believe.

John Adams to his wife Abigail Adams. July 3, 1776.

44 Dustyvet  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:39:56pm

re: #26 Timbre

Isn't a Lord times a Lord a bloody fool?

Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips and Albert Pierrpoint should meet and have a nice quiet necktie party.

45 Yankee Division Son  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:40:03pm

This is just plain sad.

46 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:41:22pm

re: #43 Egfrow

A most remarkable couple.

47 6pat6  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:41:30pm

re: #41 xenon23

Same thing when Saudi officers come to the US for training at various bases. They drink and party here like it's their last day on Earth because "allah does not see them here" (I've heard that many times from them!). They like to drive across the bridge from Saudi to Bahrain for the very same reasons - drinking, carousing, and "allah can't see them in Bahrain, either!" What a bunch of bastards.

48 Alouette  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:41:39pm

re: #28 Steffan

This keeps up much longer, and we'll see pictures of the Queen in a burqa.

I wouldn't mind seeing Camilla in a burqa.

49 WindHorse  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:41:54pm

re: #42 ploome hineni

....and so.... maybe the time has finally arrived to kick islam to the curb.

50 ted  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:42:30pm

re: #28 Steffan

"This keeps up much longer, and we'll see pictures of the Queen Charles in a burqa."

51 6pat6  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:42:43pm

re: #48 Alouette

Camilla desperately needs a burka. So does "Prince" Charles!

52 Dustyvet  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:43:42pm

re: #48 Alouette

I wouldn't mind seeing Camilla in a burqa.

I was leaning toward a saddle, while she chews on an apple...

53 sbvft contributor  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:43:43pm

re: #50 ted

Hasn't he already been spotted in Islamic garb?

54 jones  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:44:13pm

Get ready for refugees. Lots of them.

55 protestshooter  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:44:19pm

This kind of thing is exactly why I've started skipping the UK on holiday. It's just too depressing.

56 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:45:09pm

the purpose of islam is not to convert us all but to spread sharia law everywhere.
that's how they take over and tax the rest of us for not being on board w/ the screed..
in fact they want a nice percentage of infidels to finance their "religious", legal, economic, political and military system.
it is a bad move to toy w/ sharia law superseding the ancient legal system of britain, in any way whatsoever.
once they get in w/ family law, it's all over but the allah ackbarring.

57 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:46:37pm
In his speech at an East London mosque, Lord Phillips signalled wiggled, because of the lack of a backbone, approval of sharia principles as long as punishments - and divorce rulings - complied with the law of the land.

Fixed that...much better

58 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:46:38pm

re: #31 JammieWearingFool

He clarifies himself.

That doesn't make me feel much better, as incrementalism is one of the islamists favorite methodologies.

59 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:47:03pm
He declared: ‘Those entering into a contractual agreement can agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.’

That's very true, stipulation of governing law is common in contracts.

/I'm guessing Muslims won't be satisfied with just contract law though

60 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:47:30pm

re: #54 jones

Get ready for refugees. Lots of them.

It's probably fitting to re-open Ellis Island and close the southern borders. We keep importing the uneducated illegals while brushing off those who are educated and productive.

61 Drained Brain  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:47:56pm

The Canadian province of Ontario, as I recall, rejected Sharia Law after the usual flirtation, due in part to public outrage. There are still some Brits willing to get outraged and I'm pulling for them.

Rule Britannia!

62 Dahveed  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:48:55pm

Stick a fork in Great Britain. They are done.

63 Not a Yank  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:49:12pm

I have less problems with this than others on this site. If two individuals wish to enter into a contract and want to stipulate that the laws of the state of Mississippi or Wyoming or New Zealand or Saudi Arabia govern the interpretation of the provisions of the contract so be it. The contract was freely and openly arrived and and entered into.

I have a problem with automatically applying Sharia law to disputes between Muslims in the absence of a specific contract. I do not see the Chief Justice saying that he advocates automatically applying Sharia law in those situations. In those situations Common law applies.

64 WindHorse  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:49:43pm

re: #60 Egfrow

just one example....

Cuban "boat" people in 1959 Buick...

65 Drained Brain  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:50:08pm

"Before his speech, Lord Phillips was escorted through the Muslim centre in the East End of London."

Well, that shows he's impartial...

66 lawhawk  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:51:23pm

re: #61 Drained Brain


Rule Britannia!

There, much better.

67 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:51:44pm

Second Letter, This Day, July 3rd, 1776.

Had a Declaration of Independency been made seven Months ago, it would have been attended with many great and glorious Effects . . . . We might before this Hour, have formed Alliances with foreign States. -- We should have mastered Quebec and been in Possession of Canada .... You will perhaps wonder, how such a Declaration would have influenced our Affairs, in Canada, but if I could write with Freedom I could easily convince you, that it would, and explain to you the manner how. -- Many Gentlemen in high Stations and of great Influence have been duped, by the ministerial Bubble of Commissioners to treat .... And in real, sincere Expectation of this effort Event, which they so fondly wished, they have been slow and languid, in promoting Measures for the Reduction of that Province. Others there are in the Colonies who really wished that our Enterprise in Canada would be defeated, that the Colonies might be brought into Danger and Distress between two Fires, and be thus induced to submit. Others really wished to defeat the Expedition to Canada, lest the Conquest of it, should elevate the Minds of the People too much to hearken to those Terms of Reconciliation which they believed would be offered Us. These jarring Views, Wishes and Designs, occasioned an opposition to many salutary Measures, which were proposed for the Support of that Expedition, and caused Obstructions, Embarrassments and studied Delays, which have finally, lost Us the Province.

All these Causes however in Conjunction would not have disappointed Us, if it had not been for a Misfortune, which could not be foreseen, and perhaps could not have been prevented, I mean the Prevalence of the small Pox among our Troops .... This fatal Pestilence compleated our Destruction. -- It is a Frown of Providence upon Us, which We ought to lay to heart.

But on the other Hand, the Delay of this Declaration to this Time, has many great Advantages attending it. -- The Hopes of Reconciliation, which were fondly entertained by Multitudes of honest and well meaning tho weak and mistaken People, have been gradually and at last totally extinguished. -- Time has been given for the whole People, maturely to consider the great Question of Independence and to ripen their judgments, dissipate their Fears, and allure their Hopes, by discussing it in News Papers and Pamphletts, by debating it, in Assemblies, Conventions, Committees of Safety and Inspection, in Town and County Meetings, as well as in private Conversations, so that the whole People in every Colony of the 13, have now adopted it, as their own Act. -- This will cement the Union, and avoid those Heats and perhaps Convulsions which might have been occasioned, by such a Declaration Six Months ago.

But the Day is past. The Second Day of July 1776, will be the most memorable Epocha, in the History of America.

I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated, by succeeding Generations, as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more.

You will think me transported with Enthusiasm but I am not. -- I am well aware of the Toil and Blood and Treasure, that it will cost Us to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. -- Yet through all the Gloom I can see the Rays of ravishing Light and Glory. I can see that the End is more than worth all the Means. And that Posterity will tryumph in that Days Transaction, even altho We should rue it, which I trust in God We shall not.

68 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:51:47pm

re: #62 Dahveed

I think they're a long ways from being finished but they have some serious problems.

69 tyro1  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:52:39pm

The loud "THUNK" you heard was the sun finally setting on the British Empire.

70 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:52:45pm

re: #63 Not a Yank

Except with shari'a law between a man and a woman in a marital dispute, do you really think the woman would necessarily know any better or have much of a choice?

71 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:53:42pm

re: #64 WindHorse

just one example....

Cuban "boat" people in 1959 Buick...

That's quite a bit more clever than jumping fences.

72 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:54:11pm

He just wants to be able to behead the defendants.

73 Bob in Breckenridge  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:54:50pm

re: #70 Sharmuta

Except with shari'a law between a man and a woman in a marital dispute, do you really think the woman would necessarily know any better or have much of a choice?

Or chance.

74 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:55:11pm

re: #42 ploome hineni

The Canadian Council of Muslim Women similarly says, "We want the same laws to apply to us as to other Canadian women." But Syed Mumtaz Ali—the lawyer demanding that sharia be made available under the Arbitration Act—last month declared that Muslims cannot live under secular law alone: "Every act of your life is to be governed by [sharia]. If you are not obeying the law, you are not a Muslim. That's all there is to it."

[Link: www.slate.com...]

they are real bullshit artists. as long as they want to conduct themselves socially among themselves and not violate any of our laws. fine.

but that is not what they are after. they are forcing the issue of sharia law on us. they are pushing to change our system. not to integrate their beliefs in a benign way that doesn't harm society over all.

they are sneaky bastards using their "religious grievance" tactics to push their society and and all the ugly backward stone age debilitating shit that goes w/ it.

75 petero  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:55:11pm

THe truth is that in Canada other groups have this right. For instance orthodox Jews have long chosen to have business disputes and family law issues decided by a Beit Dein or religious court. The trick is of course that the religious law must not contradict Canadian Law. I see no reason to deny muslims the same right. the trouble is I dont see how Sharia law can be consistent with the common law of Britain, particularly in areas related to family law.

76 xenon23  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:56:14pm

re: #47 6pat6

Allah can't see them? Are they that stupid or do they really just mean that their Sharia Law police can't see them!

77 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:56:38pm

re: #64 WindHorse

I was also reading some letter from Thomas Jefferson to James Madison in regards to Cuba, Thomas Jefferson believed Cuba should have been made a State early on because it was the gateway to this Hemispere. This was during the conceptualization of the Monroe Doctrine.

78 ballantrae  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:56:54pm

re: #51 6pat6

Camilla is actually a gutsy lady. Read michael yon's piece regarding her.

-ron

79 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:57:19pm

re: #70 Sharmuta

Except with shari'a law between a man and a woman in a marital dispute, do you really think the woman would necessarily know any better or have much of a choice?

Yeah, that's a problem.

/contract law assumes that both parties understand the contract and the parties have equal bargaining power (no coercion) in negotiating the terms of the contract

80 Josephine  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:57:32pm

re: #24 Sharmuta

This is really troubling. It's elitists like this Lord Judge ignoring the sentiments of his Countrymen, and possibly English common law, that are driving the electorate into the arms of the fascist BNP.

My understanding is that much of British law has been superseded by EU law.

81 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:57:35pm

re: #75 petero

If it's a shari'a contract between two men, I guess I don't have much of a problem, but I have to draw the line at shari'a family law.

82 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:57:47pm

re: #70 Sharmuta

Except with shari'a law between a man and a woman in a marital dispute, do you really think the woman would necessarily know any better or have much of a choice?

Agree, since women are not seen as equals under shari'a law. It's not like both parties would enter into this contract of free will.

Plus, the Muslims that support shari'a believe everyone should live under shari'a.

83 profitsbeard  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:58:21pm

Shari'a Law is opposed to all secular law.

To not know this should disqualify the judge from office.

84 Mister Ghost  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:58:26pm

The question one should ask is, are other (non Muslim) religious laws/rulings/jurisprudence, which are not in violation with English common law, allowed to be used in family, marital, and financial disputes in Britain? If they are, then one can make the case, that Muslims should be allowed to have their own right of arbitration, because the precedent has already been set.

However, Sharia Law is such a nasty thing, that I'd rather seem them void all non secular approaches, than allow any of it to be implemented in a Western society.

85 WindHorse  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:58:28pm

re: #71 Egfrow

One wonders how many of these "types" would be: a) Whining about who had offended them, b) Whining about who owed them something, c) Whining about anything, d) Not working, e) Etc.

We are so lucky for everything we have in this country and there are so many people here who are so completely clueless about what they have and how the rest of the world "coexists".

86 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:58:43pm

I can no longer respect the UK nor another culture who lays down to die without a fight. If we would have know this would happen within 60 years after liberating Europe during WWII I bet many of our fallen patriots would have not wasted the lives and treasure to do so. I can imagine this now.

87 stevieray  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:59:48pm

Sharia is inevitable in England, and the rest of the West as well. The demographics are in its favor, and the multi-culti indoctrination that passes as education in today's schools renders our societies incapable of resisting.

There are no longer any core Western values to defend... they have been deconstructed away, shredded from inside by the neo-primitives of the left, who long ago realized that civil society was their biggest enemy. The two-tiered societies of the non-Western world are perfectly suited to the needs of the socialist and the marxist... totalitarian by nature, with a needy populace looking upward to the government for sustenance and protection.

Diana West got it right. Read this interview from yesterday's NRO... she sees it all too clearly.

The left had the easy job... destruction is simpler than building, and selling "hey... nothing really matters" is a cakewalk in a wealthy society. Neglect always brings decay... convince people to accept "anything goes" as a moral position, and entropy takes care of the rest.

88 rorschach  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 6:59:50pm
#31 JammieWearingFool
He clarifies himself.


Sounds like he pulled an obama.

p.s. Isn't there still someone over there with a little Churchill blood in them?

89 ballantrae  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:00:05pm

This is a quote from Michael Yon regarding Lady Camilla:

Besides, I wanted to meet her to tell her one thing. I had come to learn that these soldiers are quick to praise others but reticent on all matters relating to personal or individual acclaim. The famous British reserve is ever strong, and I wondered if it might prevent the men from telling her directly what the soldiers had told me so often. So when the commander introduced me to Lady Camilla and we had our short and very public meeting before all those cameras, I told Lady Camilla that her handwritten letters to the soldiers were very important to them. That I could tell that they were cherished in a way that went beyond polite acknowledgment. In that brief exchange it was clear to this American with no sense of Royalty that her devotion to these soldiers also went beyond the expected call of duty. She had made it a point to know what they were going through and she had made it a point to let them know how valued their service to their country was in her esteem. Once the formal ceremony concluded the press slowly evaporated but she stayed for hours in the gym, spending time talking informally with any and all the soldiers and their families, without an entourage.

90 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:00:50pm

re: #75 petero

I disagree with Jews and Christians using this too. Of course private disputes can be handled by a Rabbi or Imam and contracts can be drawn up any way people choose but legal disputes should be dealt with by the state not the church/mosque.

91 chicagodudewhotrades  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:01:03pm

Britain committing cultural suicide plus a housing market that is crashing worse and harder then ours (This is why Northern Rock mortgage company was nationalized over there). Plus , in continental Europe there is the same creeping Islamization plus 4% inflation. Selling the Pound and Euro is going to be real profitable soon.

92 EvilDave3  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:01:14pm

Well, I hate to say it, but ....
If you look at his words in context and with your "How will this work in reality" filter off, his comment isn't that controversial.
It is a simple Choice of Laws/Arbitration clause in a contract.
You usually sign the same type of thing when you sign a contract that says "this contract will be judged by the laws of Delaware" etc.

So, on your law school exam, Sharia in England under this type of thing is acceptable and the correct answer, with the limitation of judicial review for grievous error (I forget the exact words, it has been a while).

But as Cartman at #19 said, "Good luck with that one, King Solomon."

No way this is going to work on par with normal arbitration and choice of law contracts that specify Catholic or Jewish canon law. No way the Muslims are going to play their game within the limitations of British law.
These people are masters of "give me an inch, I'll take a mile".

93 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:01:15pm

they are too fcking vocal and obnoxious w/ their demands.
get the fck out of modern society and the civilized world.

94 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:01:41pm

There is only one possible response to these "reasonable" requests from the Muslim communities.

NO! Every single time, the answer should be a resounding NO!

There is no basis to trust them on. Their culture is based on hatred, oppression and treachery. This constant capitulation does nothing but lead them to the conclusion that they are winning (they are) and to keep it up.

Until such a time as they have proven they can be trusted, which means stop trying to kill everyone in sight and a putting the 24/7 seethe cycle to an end, then every "deal" worked out with them is another victory for them.

95 rawmuse  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:01:52pm

Wishing everyone a happy 4th. A warm thanks to all veterans, alive and dead, on whose shoulders we in the US of A stand. All gave some, but some gave all. This thread is a fitting reminder of why we choose Independence. I would much rather be a Citizen than a Subject.

96 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:01:57pm

re: #89 ballantrae

When I learned of The Duchess' kindness to the troops of her nation, my respect for her multiplied a thousand fold.

97 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:02:59pm

re: #95 rawmuse

It's also a reminder to keep a close eye on you pets. Make sure all of our four legged friends are inside and safe.

98 Pullus Iulius  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:04:04pm

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Given the correct literary (and modern) interpretation of "men" to mean "people", and that "all" still means "all", sharia in its modern practice is antithetical to the American nation. Would that the UK felt likewise about their nation.

99 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:04:36pm

re: #87 stevieray

I disagree with the "Rest of the West" portion of your argument. Not while I breathe. Not within my physical reach. The 5-4 vote on the Second has disturbed me to no end. This is a dangerous situation in human history and we will have to fight like no other generation before has ever considered.

100 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:04:43pm

Give them a inch and they'll take...and take...and take...and take...

101 WindHorse  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:05:51pm

re: #85 WindHorse

(I didn't mean "here" at LGF..... I meant "here" in the US....)

102 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:06:20pm

Far too many muslimas have no idea of the precious few rights the koran does give them, so for a muslima to "agree" to a shari'a contract and to assume she understand what she's getting herself into is both a gross assumption and a dereliction of the laws of her Western nation to protect her rights.

103 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:06:37pm

re: #100 jorline

Give them a inch and they'll take...and take...and take...and take...

just look around the world for proof of your statement.
and it's on going.

104 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:08:12pm

We should start a petition to allow the Citizens of the UK to adopt our Declaration of Independence. This will prove that there is a will to live even if it's just a scrap. That would be enough.

105 rawmuse  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:08:39pm

re: #97 Killgore Trout

I not only have all my pets, but those of my neighbors as well! The wife is with her Mom, the neighbors are all off Lord knows where. I have gigs in town this weekend, so, I get the pet duties. I have 4 dogs as charges and 2 cats. They are all being kept inside, but not all with me. I feel flattered that I have 4 neighbors that have trusted me with keys to their houses, and they are all Libs, but who cares, they are neighbors first. This one dog is a nice hound, we sing together. It is good for the soul.

Happy 4th to one of my fave posters, KT!

106 cincinnati_kid37  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:09:00pm

Stars and Stripes Forever

107 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:09:21pm

re: #102 Sharmuta

Far too many muslimas have no idea of the precious few rights the koran does give them, so for a muslima to "agree" to a shari'a contract and to assume she understand what she's getting herself into is both a gross assumption and a dereliction of the laws of her Western nation to protect her rights.

That's all true.

/but more often than not, she doesn't want to be protected, think FLDS in Texas

108 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:11:24pm

re: #103 nyc redneck

just look around the world for proof of your statement.
and it's on going.

They're never happy with muslims living under their own laws. Everyone and everything offends them; therefore they feel everyone should live under their laws...even if they're a guest or immigrant in that country.

109 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:12:32pm

I wonder if these women had a sharia labor contract:
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

110 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:12:58pm

re: #105 rawmuse

Cheers!

111 DistantThunder  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:13:40pm

re: #89 ballantrae

This is a quote from Michael Yon regarding Lady Camilla:

Very charming.

112 xenon23  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:14:18pm

re: #107 Killian Bundy

FLDS Woman sell clothing on the internet

Did you see that the woman from the FLDS are selling clothing on the internet now?

113 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:14:18pm

re: #109 jaunte

I wonder if these women had a sharia labor contract:
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

Dont be silly. Everyone knows when the case is Sharia versus silly local customs, like the rule of law or basic decency, Sharia has precedence.

114 DistantThunder  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:14:47pm

re: #94 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

There is only one possible response to these "reasonable" requests from the Muslim communities.

NO! Every single time, the answer should be a resounding NO!

There is no basis to trust them on. Their culture is based on hatred, oppression and treachery. This constant capitulation does nothing but lead them to the conclusion that they are winning (they are) and to keep it up.

Until such a time as they have proven they can be trusted, which means stop trying to kill everyone in sight and a putting the 24/7 seethe cycle to an end, then every "deal" worked out with them is another victory for them.

Otherwise it will be like a camel with it's nose in the tent. Smelly and large.

115 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:14:55pm

re: #113 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)

Oil money talks.

116 DistantThunder  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:15:29pm

re: #112 xenon23

FLDS Woman sell clothing on the internet

Did you see that the woman from the FLDS are selling clothing on the internet now?

They were told by the social workers that they had to get apartments, find jobs and put their children in day care.

117 Wilderstad  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:15:53pm
118 DistantThunder  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:16:38pm

re: #105 rawmuse

I not only have all my pets, but those of my neighbors as well! The wife is with her Mom, the neighbors are all off Lord knows where. I have gigs in town this weekend, so, I get the pet duties. I have 4 dogs as charges and 2 cats. They are all being kept inside, but not all with me. I feel flattered that I have 4 neighbors that have trusted me with keys to their houses, and they are all Libs, but who cares, they are neighbors first. This one dog is a nice hound, we sing together. It is good for the soul.

Happy 4th to one of my fave posters, KT!

The most trustworthy character on the block - maybe because they also know not to trust each other.

119 xenon23  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:16:42pm

re: #116 DistantThunder

So this is there new job? What's hairdo tips!

120 DoubleU  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:17:55pm

re: #47 6pat6

This would explain why the 9/11 hijackers spent a lot of time in various South Florida strip bars before the 11th.

121 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:18:43pm

re: #115 jaunte

Oil money talks.

So do big sticks.

122 chicagodudewhotrades  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:18:44pm

I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist, I'm not, but with all the petro dollars moving into the Muslim world has anyone else thought that maybe the Wahabbis are bribing folks like Rowan Williams, this judge and other lawmakers/people of influence to say and support nice things about Islam?

123 DistantThunder  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:18:56pm

re: #119 xenon23

So this is there new job? What's hairdo tips!

They must have been getting requests. i can see how costume people and re-enactors would want them.

124 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:19:18pm

re: #112 xenon23

FLDS Woman sell clothing on the internet

Did you see that the woman from the FLDS are selling clothing on the internet now?

Yeah, I saw that.

/and their lifestyle is actually illegal in the U.S., go figure

125 DistantThunder  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:19:55pm

re: #122 chicagodudewhotrades

I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist, I'm not, but with all the petro dollars moving into the Muslim world has anyone else thought that maybe the Wahabbis are bribing folks like Rowan Williams, this judge and other lawmakers/people of influence to say and support nice things about Islam?

Very possible. Or is the guy just a dangerous naive liberal old fool, also possible.

126 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:20:09pm

islam is never good for women, infidels or believers either.

127 xenon23  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:20:14pm

re: #123 DistantThunder

When follywood make a movie about then they can buy the wardrobes from this site.

128 DistantThunder  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:20:48pm

re: #124 Killian Bundy

Yeah, I saw that.

/and their lifestyle is actually illegal in the U.S., go figure

Their lifestyle is not illegal if you are referring to living as polygamists because they are not officially married by a legal authority.

129 Josephine  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:21:38pm

re: #42 ploome hineni

CTV

"McGuinty rules out use of sharia law in Ontario

"Updated Mon. Sep. 12 2005 11:31 PM ET

"Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty says there will be no sharia law in his province and that he will move to ban all faith-based arbitrations.

"Seeking to end months of debate, McGuinty said he would not let his province become the first Western government to allow the use of Islamic law to settle family disputes and that the boundaries between church and state would become clearer by banning religious arbitration completely.

"'There will be no Shariah law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians,' McGuinty told The Canadian Press..."

130 DistantThunder  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:21:38pm

Democrats:

STOP THE ENERGY TORTURE!

131 xenon23  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:22:02pm

re: #124 Killian Bundy

I am in Texas and I was shocked that we just let them have their kids back. They are lucky it was not Janet Reno who went after them!

132 Dustyvet  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:22:42pm

re: #69 tyro1

The loud "THUNK" you heard was the sun finally setting on the British Empire.

The Ravens at the Tower of London where last seen by Beef eaters, packing their wee bags, and booking flights out of the United Kingdom.

133 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:23:03pm

re: #122 chicagodudewhotrades

I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist, I'm not, but with all the petro dollars moving into the Muslim world has anyone else thought that maybe the Wahabbis are bribing folks like Rowan Williams, this judge and other lawmakers/people of influence to say and support nice things about Islam?

of course that is happening. it's 'soft jihad'.
i bet a lot of these people are being bought off.
(hoping the croc eats them last)
miserable jerks.

134 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:23:30pm

Jihad's Plan C, in action

Since 9/11, Islamist terror movements have been debating grand strategy. Osama bin Laden had theorized that the “infidel,” led by the United States, would crumble after a series of spectacular attacks, just as the Meccan “infidel” government did when the Prophet Muhammad launched deadly raids against its trade routes. Yet the 9/11 attacks didn’t lead to an “infidel” retreat. On the contrary, the “Great Satan” hit back hard.

That persuaded some al Qaeda leaders that a new strategy of smaller, slower but steadier attacks was needed. Ayman al-Zawahiri, al Qaeda’s No. 2, has advocated such a strategy since 2003, arguing that the jihad should first target Muslim countries where it has a chance of toppling the incumbent regimes.

Now Naji takes that analysis a step further - suggesting that low-intensity war be extended to anywhere in the world with a significant Muslim presence. Islamists in the “wilderness” must create parallel societies alongside existing ones, Naji says - but not set up formal governments, which would be subject to economic pressure or military attack. … In a notable departure from past al Qaeda strategy, Naji recommends “countless small operations” that render daily life unbearable, rather than a few spectacular attacks such as 9/11: The “infidel,” leaving his home every morning, should be unsure whether he’ll return in the evening. Naji recommends kidnappings, the holding of hostages, the use of women and children as human shields, exhibition killings to terrorize the enemy, suicide bombings and countless gestures that make normal life impossible for the “infidel” and Muslim collaborators.

Once parallel societies are established throughout the world, they would exert pressure on non-Muslims to submit. Naji believes that, subjected to constant intimidation and fear of death, most non-Muslims (especially in the West) would submit: “The West has no stomach for a long fight.”

The only Western power still capable of resisting is the United States, he believes. But that, too, will change once President Bush is gone.

135 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:23:40pm

re: #128 DistantThunder

Their lifestyle is not illegal if you are referring to living as polygamists because they are not officially married by a legal authority.

/underage "marriage" is a felony called child rape

136 Tarkus289  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:23:55pm

Maybe we should colonize Britain...........Tomorrow. Now that would be Ironic.

137 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:25:08pm

re: #136 Tarkus289

Maybe we should colonize Britain...........Tomorrow. Now that would be Ironic.

Don't think I have not seriously thought about that. What we should do is what we do in other countries dominated by malaise and oppression, stoke revolution!

138 Da_Beerfreak  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:26:10pm

re: #130 DistantThunder

Democrats:

STOP THE ENERGY TORTURE!

Drill Here, Drill Now, or Look for another job come November!

139 jcm  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:26:27pm

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

[cont]

140 jcm  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:27:01pm

[cont]

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

[cont]

141 jcm  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:27:28pm

[cont]

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

[cont]

142 jcm  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:27:42pm

[cont]

— John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

143 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:27:47pm

re: #137 Egfrow

Don't think I have not seriously thought about that. What we should do is what we do in other countries dominated by malaise and oppression, stoke revolution!

Personally, I'm looking south of the border. From the halls of Montezuma isn't just a snappy catch phrase. They want to come up here, we might as well just take it down there. We'll have to clean house first, of course.

144 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:27:51pm

re: #122 chicagodudewhotrades

I don't think so. Why bother bribing people who are inherently weak willed?

145 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:28:27pm

This is from the Onion, right?
Actually this is beyond mad. Why doesn't Great Britain just get rid of the monarchy, Parliament and give the country to the mullahs. This death by a thousand cuts has to be torture.

146 Tarkus289  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:30:42pm

Remember, tomorrow is also the the anniversary of the EL- AL incident, those who pray, say one for the victims and families.

147 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:30:53pm

re: #145 pingjockey

This is from the Onion, right?
Actually this is beyond mad. Why doesn't Great Britain just get rid of the monarchy, Parliament and give the country to the mullahs. This death by a thousand cuts has to be torture.

Unfortunately, the evidence of the last 8 years is overwhelming towards this to be near true.

148 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:31:33pm

Why did we even bother with Normandy?

149 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:32:08pm

re: #146 Tarkus289
Also one of the greatest rescues ever pulled off. Entebbe, 1976.

150 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:32:22pm

I'm becoming more and more fond of embracing Isolationism. We have to circle the wagons.

151 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:33:08pm

re: #148 Egfrow
Make the mind boggle. Let's give up Western civilization to lunatic medieval morons.

152 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:33:39pm

re: #148 Egfrow

Why did we even bother with Normandy?

Because it was the right thing to do. We may have to do it again someday if they keep carrying on like this.

153 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:34:32pm

re: #148 Egfrow

Why did we even bother with Normandy?

/or Belleau Wood

154 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:34:36pm

re: #150 Egfrow

I'm becoming more and more fond of embracing Isolationism. We have to circle the wagons.

Your best defense is a good offense.

155 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:34:57pm

re: #148 Egfrow

Why did we even bother with Normandy?

It seemed like a good idea at the time.

156 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:35:18pm

re: #150 Egfrow

I'm becoming more and more fond of embracing Isolationism. We have to circle the wagons.

Ron Paul!
/

157 Tarkus289  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:35:36pm

re: #149 pingjockey

I need to get a copy of the movie they made about that, but it would probably not be as impressive as the documentaries I've seen.

158 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:36:29pm

re: #150 Egfrow

I'm becoming more and more fond of embracing Isolationism. We have to circle the wagons.

I think the islamists would love nothing better than for the US to become isolationists.

159 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:37:23pm

re: #151 pingjockey

Make the mind boggle. Let's give up Western civilization to lunatic medieval morons.

Western Civilization is giving up on themselves. At this point in time, I don't see the Majority of "Western Civilization" actually having anything in common with Unites States Civilization despite what the MSM want us to believe. The West, which is outside the USA has no incentive to to defend themselves because they know we are here to save their asses. It's a sense of entitlement servitude.

160 Tarkus289  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:37:47pm

I would much prefer to isolate them, for at least a few centuries, give them time to catch up.

161 DesertSage  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:38:45pm

Happy Quarto de Julio everyone!

Do you know how many people approve of your congress this fine Independence Day eve?

162 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:38:50pm

re: #150 Egfrow

I'm becoming more and more fond of embracing Isolationism. We have to circle the wagons.

It might seem the thing to do, but isolation is not the way to win. There isn't a fortress that hasn't been breached, the Maginot line didn't help the French, and three countries a year fell to communism during Carter's isolationism. If we stop engaging they will come to our shore one day.

163 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:39:11pm

re: #156 Cartman

Ron Paul!
/

Ron Paul is an Anarchist. He want's no government despite the rhetoric Libertarians have plagiarized and distorted, they want absolutism, aka do what you feel is good.

164 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:39:53pm

re: #155 itellu3times

It seemed like a good idea at the time.

/actually, it didn't at the time, although they went ahead anyway after much discussion and trepidation, despite the odds

165 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:40:07pm

re: #157 Tarkus289
The movie had Charles Bronson, a Very young James Woods, and a buncha folks I know and can't recall names for. It was a Movie of the Week back in the days of 3 networks!

166 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:40:34pm

The judiciaries of Western democracies have traditionally been the guardians of the freedom of individuals from oppressive legislative acts. This role has carried with it a natural and healthy bias in favour of the rights of individuals to deal with their property in whatever way they see fit, so long as they stay within the boundaries of the recognized criminal laws, land use statutes and civil liberties of the society.
So far so good.
But when fanatical religious elements within society seek to impose upon others property agreements and codes of conduct which are foreign and antithetical to the basic values of the larger society, such as Sharia law, these judiciaries are legally bound to refuse to enforce such agreements.
Gratuitous political pronouncements and speeches by senior judges such as the one by Britain's top judge are extremely dangerous and outside the traditional and proper role of the judiciary. Judges are not politicians or advocates - they are supposed to decide legal cases based on the evidence before them. In such cases, the judge is required to hear evidence to fairly determine whether the parties' agreements were coerced by religious leaders or family members. The judge must also determine whether the particular elements of Sharia at play in the case before him/her are outside the pale of the basic values of the larger society. None of this takes place when a judge chooses to shoot off his/her mouth in public like a common advocate or politician.
Such conduct by judges, smacking of partiality and politics, is destructive of the integrity and impartiality of the judicial system and must not be tolerated.

167 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:40:42pm

re: #164 Killian Bundy

/actually, it didn't at the time, although they went ahead anyway after much discussion and trepidation, despite the odds

A continental invasion is not a tea party.

168 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:41:20pm

BTW: This move by the judge plays right into AQ's new strategy as laid out in their recent manifesto.

169 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:41:42pm

re: #162 Thanos

It might seem the thing to do, but isolation is not the way to win. There isn't a fortress that hasn't been breached, the Maginot line didn't help the French, and three countries a year fell to communism during Carter's isolationism. If we stop engaging they will come to our shore one day.

I'm all about the offensive, but this is not the true state of our immediate prospects, we are already on the defense from attacks within. We have to spend our resources on a breach that has already occurred. Then we can re-focus. Right now, We have an internal cancer that needs to be removed.

170 golly_wog  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:42:01pm

I guess the white cliffs of Dover are turning to sand. Despicable, just despicable.

171 Tarkus289  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:42:02pm

re: #165 pingjockey

I'm sure you know about James Woods and the 9/11 hijackers thing.

172 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:42:35pm

re: #167 itellu3times

A continental invasion is not a tea party.

/especially in horrendous weather that wasn't part of the plan

173 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:43:01pm

re: #163 Egfrow

Ron Paul is an Anarchist. He want's no government despite the rhetoric Libertarians have plagiarized and distorted, they want absolutism, aka do what you feel is good.

I agree. I was just pointing out that Ron Paul is also definitely an isolationist

174 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:43:34pm

re: #171 Tarkus289
No, what? I know he is not a raving leftist. How he gets work in Hollyweird is beyond me.

175 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:43:36pm

re: #169 Egfrow

I'm going to say it again- the islamists would love nothing more than for us to retreat from the international scene.

We fought two fronts in WWII and kept our country safe- we can do it again.

176 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:43:58pm

re: #169 Egfrow

I'm all about the offensive, but this is not the true state of our immediate prospects, we are already on the defense from attacks within. We have to spend our resources on a breach that has already occurred. Then we can re-focus. Right now, We have an internal cancer that needs to be removed.

Who's this we? We are still kicking ass, there's no rot from within that hasn't always been there, and it's never won over long periods of time.

I'm assuming that you are from the US from your icon, and not England.

177 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:44:49pm

re: #175 Sharmuta
We have no choice. Fight them over there or end up like the mess the Israelis have with bombs going off in Pizza Hut.

178 JeremyR  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:45:43pm

re: #150 Egfrow

I'm becoming more and more fond of embracing Isolationism. We have to circle the wagons.

Nothing makes you a sitting duck like a defensive position. Look at all the successes in modern times, the Maginot line for instance.
Infantry motto Shoot, Move, Communicate.
Shoot first, if you aren't shooting you'd best be reloading while you adjust your position. You sit too long, they get a bead on you and then the arty hits fast and hard. As you move, let your buds know where you are, where the enemy is, and what both are doing, it keeps the shots heading in the right direction.

My avatar is from the first Minnesota Infantry, now the 135th. The were devestated in battle several times, but always on the offensive. When sent to relieve the second Iowa who had become trapped, they accomplished their mission, bringing out the Iowa unit nearly intact. The 1st Minnesota suffered over 70% casualties.
Had they not gone in, the Iowans would have been anhilated.

179 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:46:02pm

the way we allow these barbarian thugs into our civilized world and make pain staking efforts to accommodate them, is just absurd.
it's like allowing an ancient extinct breed of hominid ie. homo neanderthalensis, into our world and actually give them a lot of say into how it's going to be w/ our laws, culture, society and politics.
why would we do that?

180 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:46:26pm

re: #176 Thanos

...there's no rot from within that hasn't always been there, and it's never won over long periods of time.

Well, massive illegal immigration might come to mind?

181 Tigger2005  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:46:54pm

When al-Q says "The West has no stomach for a long fight" I have to laugh. For me, living in the world they envision is unthinkable. I have no stomach for it. The very thought of it makes me feel like I'm being asphyxiated. I will fight them as long as it takes. Surrender is simply not an option for me. Endless war ending in violent death actually seems quite pleasant compared to the slow suffocation of a liberty-less life.

182 DesertSage  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:47:01pm

What Is Patriotism?

John Sidney McCain III- "Putting The Country First"

Barack Hussein Obama II- "Faith In One Another As Americans"

Whose vision of patriotism is closest to your own?

183 opnion  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:47:33pm

Very sad & disturbing when you witness a Western Democracy begin to readily submit to Barbarians.
The law of the land is the law of the land. That should apply to all. Once again the darkness is emboldened

184 JeremyR  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:47:34pm

re: #160 Tarkus289

I would much prefer to isolate them, for at least a few centuries, give them time to catch up.

Thats a luagh, isolate them for a few centuries and they will kill them selves off.

185 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:47:37pm

re: #177 pingjockey

We have no choice. Fight them over there or end up like the mess the Israelis have with bombs going off in Pizza Hut.

Hamas and Hezbollah cells already operate freely within the United States.

/they don't attack us on our own soil because they don't want to queer their fundraising

186 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:48:20pm

re: #180 Cartman

Well, massive illegal immigration might come to mind?

Honestly I'm a lot more worried about our energy future, creeping socialism, missile defense, our Military budget, and taxes.

Illegal immigration is bad but it's not the worst of our woes.

187 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:48:25pm

re: #184 JeremyR

They've had a 1000 years to catch up and haven't done it yet.

188 Desert Dog  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:48:27pm

Add this judge's opinion to that of the Archbishop of Canterbury and I see the culture, history and sovereignty of the UK eroding at an alarming rate. It appears that Europeans are not capable of assimilating the large number of immigrants in their midst. The US has it's problems with immigration from time to time, but we always seem to work it out.....If they do not start insisting on keeping their way of life, and insisting soon, the UK as we know it will cease to exist.

189 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:49:01pm

re: #184 JeremyR

Thats a luagh, isolate them for a few centuries and they will kill them selves off.

Like in Pakistan right now.

190 Tarkus289  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:49:27pm

re: #174 pingjockey

No, not a leftist at all. He was on an airline flight a few weeks (I think) before 9/11, he witnessed some of the highjackers doing what look like a dry run, on the morning of 9/11 he called the FBI to report what he had witnessed, they told him thank you for the tip. The next morning at 7:00 am., several officers were at his house and spoke with him for a long time, when he asked if they thought it was important, they said we received tens of thousands of tips, and four of us just spent the entire morning with you. He said O.K.

191 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:50:30pm

I'm out for a bit, need to figure out what I am going to do about a banner...

192 Tarkus289  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:51:02pm

re: #184 JeremyR

Your point?

193 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:51:05pm

re: #185 Killian Bundy
That is a valid point. Cut off all their damn money. However, the Majik Kingdom still funds a whole lot of shit. Drill our own oil and cut off at least our funding terrorists. Of course the Chicoms and whoever else buys SA oil will still be providing funding for lunatics.

194 JeremyR  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:51:17pm

re: #187 pingjockey

They've had a 1000 years to catch up and haven't done it yet.

And the only reason they haven't killed themselves off is because they can get out and attack civilization.

195 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:51:25pm

re: #175 Sharmuta

Of course, you can't keep reaching out when your footing is being eaten away by termites. You have to address that front first. My point being, I want a push outward, but our internal strength is being compromised under most Americans radar. We have to create cohesion and re-enforce what we are to give us strength to take this greater task on. It is not the responsibility for the USA to be the world's savior. But should reach out to those who reach out to us. When they resist every attempt at a life preserver we throw at them then it is just a wast of time. Our internal issues are a great danger and must be addressed before continuing on with strength. Right now the MSM is showing the world we want to be just like them, abiet not really true to us, but it is to them and this is depressing them. When re retake our own national pride back from the broadcasting of these falsehoods and deceptions we can then take control or our real message and continue our obligation at promoting and taking on the enemies. Tbis is not really isloationism but just more like a re-grouping, Being Altruist at the cost of our own needs is evil.

196 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:52:27pm

re: #186 Thanos

Honestly I'm a lot more worried about our energy future, creeping socialism, missile defense, our Military budget, and taxes.

Illegal immigration is bad but it's not the worst of our woes.

But it negatively impacts either directly or indirectly each one of the concerns you just outlined.

197 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:52:28pm

re: #190 Tarkus289
Cool. TSA has its collective head so far up its ass a oil drill couldn't find it.

198 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:53:06pm

re: #184 JeremyR

Agreed the only reason they are a problem is because of oil money. Within 50 years or so (hopefully sooner) that money is going to dry up. After that they will be an unfixable welfare burden like sub-Saharan Africa but they won't be a threat to Western society.

199 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:53:17pm

/sounds like Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan... just sayin

200 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:53:25pm

re: #195 Egfrow

Retreat in the eyes of the islamists is weakness! It is against our national interests to recede into isolationism.

201 So?  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:54:09pm

Top nut judge.

202 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:54:14pm

re: #179 nyc redneck

the way we allow these barbarian thugs into our civilized world and make pain staking efforts to accommodate them, is just absurd.
it's like allowing an ancient extinct breed of hominid ie. homo neanderthalensis, into our world and actually give them a lot of say into how it's going to be w/ our laws, culture, society and politics.
why would we do that?

Cheap labour.
Politics.
Hubris.

203 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:54:21pm

re: #194 JeremyR
Yep. If they ever get their damn Caliphate, the bloodbath of who is actually speaking for allah(stan) will make the Holocaust seem as nothing.

204 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:55:07pm

re: #199 Thanos

/sounds like Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan... just sayin

What/who does?

205 Da_Beerfreak  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:55:34pm
re: #160 Tarkus289
I would much prefer to isolate them, for at least a few centuries, give them time to catch up.

re: #184 JeremyR
Thats a luagh, isolate them for a few centuries and they will kill them selves off.

I don't know about you, but that works for me. Let them solve the problem for us by doing themselves in.

206 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:55:37pm

re: #200 Sharmuta

It's not retreating when you are fighting inside your own lines.

207 JeremyR  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:55:46pm

re: #192 Tarkus289

Your point?

I don't think they will catch up, they have had exposure and many chances to assimilate. they are a backasswards culture. They would turn on each other if they could not find infidels to strike at. Their religion of piis commands them to attack anyone with diffrent beliefs which is why there are more Pali on Pali murders then killings of Palis by IDF and killings of IDF by palis every week.

208 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:56:01pm

re: #188 Desert Dog

Add this judge's opinion to that of the Archbishop of Canterbury and I see the culture, history and sovereignty of the UK eroding at an alarming rate. It appears that Europeans are not capable of assimilating the large number of immigrants in their midst. The US has it's problems with immigration from time to time, but we always seem to work it out.....If they do not start insisting on keeping their way of life, and insisting soon, the UK as we know it will cease to exist.

It certainly is a one-two punch.

209 DebbieSym  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:56:11pm

I think I feel sick. What is wrong with those Brits? Do you think the average British citizen feels this way?

210 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:56:49pm

re: #204 Cartman

What/who does?

The call for isolationism.

211 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:57:24pm

re: #209 DebbieSym

I think I feel sick. What is wrong with those Brits? Do you think the average British citizen feels this way?

no, less so now more than ever.

212 Tarkus289  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:57:53pm

re: #207 JeremyR

I was saying "Your point?" jokingly, It was a more polite way of saying, "so what".

213 JeremyR  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:57:55pm

re: #198 Killgore Trout

Agreed the only reason they are a problem is because of oil money. Within 50 years or so (hopefully sooner) that money is going to dry up. After that they will be an unfixable welfare burden like sub-Saharan Africa but they won't be a threat to Western society.

Unfortunately our lame assed congress will continue to subsidize their camel follies.

214 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:57:55pm

Muslims feel like 'Jews of Europe'

Britain's first Muslim minister has attacked the growing culture of hostility against Muslims in the United Kingdom, saying that many feel targeted like "the Jews of Europe".

/you know, except for the extermination camps

215 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:58:35pm

re: #206 Egfrow

I think it's the job of the government to provide our national defense.

It is the job of the citizenry to wage the culture war.

216 opnion  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:59:09pm

re: #186 Thanos

Honestly I'm a lot more worried about our energy future, creeping socialism, missile defense, our Military budget, and taxes.

Illegal immigration is bad but it's not the worst of our woes.


Well brace yourself. No matter who wins this election , we are scewed as far is immigration, It won't be illegal ,because it will all be legalized.
Extended families will just come in.millions & millions of a new entitled class. That money to fund these entitlements will come from the middle Class & thus we will see the erosion economicaly of the WWII miracle of a robust Middle Class.
It is not xenophobia to oppose this economic assault.

217 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:59:09pm

re: #209 DebbieSym

Do you think the average British citizen feels this way?


No. Some do but I'd guess most don't. Multiculturalism has been pushed on them for the past 50 years by their politicians and judges against their will. There just haven't been many good political alternatives, which is why assholes like the BNP are gaining ground.

218 pingjockey  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:59:19pm

re: #211 nyc redneck
Unfortunately a direct result of the UK gov't bending over and grabbing it ankles is the resurgence of the BNP, which is loosely disguised nazism.

219 JeremyR  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 7:59:43pm

re: #212 Tarkus289

I was saying "Your point?" jokingly, It was a more polite way of saying, "so what".

Well I was agreeing we should isolate them, I just expect a diffrent result.

220 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:00:26pm

re: #213 JeremyR

For a while, yes. But it's going to come to an end sooner or later. After that the Islamic world has nothing to fall back on.

221 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:00:26pm

re: #214 Killian Bundy

Muslims feel like 'Jews of Europe'

/you know, except for the extermination camps

Mr Malik said that many British Muslims now felt like 'aliens in their own country'

/gee, I wonder why?

222 derkrieger  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:01:21pm

I can hear the votes for the BNP growing even now...

223 Paul  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:01:36pm

Lord Phillips is just another upper class twit. The British ruling class is the enemy of the ordinary Englishman.

224 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:02:26pm

re: #220 Killgore Trout

For a while, yes. But it's going to come to an end sooner or later. After that the Islamic world has nothing to fall back on.

/except all the petro dollars they've been steadily investing in Western markets for decades

225 Josephine  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:03:39pm

re: #214 Killian Bundy

I've heard Muslims on CBC Radio call-in shows claim, in all seriousness, that Muslims in Canada today are being treated the same as Jews in Nazi Germany.

Are they delusional or bald-faced liars?

I can never understand why the hosts don't just laugh them off the air.

/Tip-toe round the Muslims... (Paging Tiny Tim.)

226 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:03:40pm

re: #206 Egfrow

Sharm, Let me also make clear that my thought of Isolationism does not denote a lack of will to fight. It's probably the wrong word for my sentiments. I just think the fight is already here which goes with my previous comment about about fighting within my personal reach. I'm not in the Military and have already went through Desert Storm. which pissed me off then because we had to stop before reaching Iraq. But we have to have a Front here and now. It's been ignored. The political weakness growing inside is as important as the battlefield. It's time to rock the boat here. Produtive Americans who work, and support their families must take their noses out of the grinding wheel of life and take a look at what's happening around them here. When this happens, which I believe it already is, then the battle to take on our internal 5th columns has begun and will be won. The problem is not capability but willingness. This is not just an effort on the battlefield but it is also our businesses and our politics, education etc. One of my greatest hopes is that when many of our troops come home they will still fight in other ways.

227 JeremyR  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:03:55pm

re: #220 Killgore Trout

For a while, yes. But it's going to come to an end sooner or later. After that the Islamic world has nothing to fall back on.

Oh, I agree, I just think some bleeding heart libtards in congress will continue to ear mark money for them long after the oil wells have rusted into nothing.
Cut the supply of money? Jihad!

228 So?  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:04:09pm

[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]

He's destroying Britain's long and hard fought history

229 derkrieger  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:04:20pm
#186 Thanos

Honestly I'm a lot more worried about our energy future, creeping socialism, missile defense, our Military budget, and taxes.

Illegal immigration is bad but it's not the worst of our woes.

Illegal immigration immigration is a tool used to implement socialism so yes, it is a major major issue.

230 MandyManners  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:04:36pm

re: #214 Killian Bundy

Muslims feel like 'Jews of Europe'


/you know, except for the extermination camps

Send for the waaaaaaaaaaaahmbulance.

231 markie  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:05:21pm

Lord Philips just said that to get out of that Mosque in one piece. Or,

He's stark, raving, MAD!
232 So?  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:05:49pm

Britain's top nut job.

233 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:06:17pm

Energy is the biggest problem facing us and the world in coming years, bar none. Other problems might seem more urgent, but none is so important.

This is linked above, I recommend you watch Glen:

234 Petero  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:06:56pm

re: #90 Killgore Trout
re: #90 Killgore Trout

I dont disagree, I am just telling you how it is here. To be clear there are areas of Jewish law around divorce which are problematic when held up to scrutiny according to Canadian law. It is not an easy marriage (pardon the pun), but the rules should apply across the board.

235 derkrieger  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:07:23pm

re: #226 Egfrow

... This is not just an effort on the battlefield but it is also our businesses and our politics, education etc. One of my greatest hopes is that when many of our troops come home they will still fight in other ways.

The pubic education system is part and parcel of the fifth column. Where do you think PC multi-culti fanaticism is incubated?

Anyone and everyone who can either afford private school or home schooling should remove their children from public education.

236 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:07:36pm

re: #226 Egfrow

I think there are already a number of citizens taking up this fight- one of whom is our gracious host. I think we're slowly making a difference. You can see this in the continued down trends in the bottom line of the msm papers, and in the growing numbers of home schoolers. It's not an easy fight, and it's one I think will continue to proceed slowly, but it is happening, and a number of people are doing what they can in their own ways.

237 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:08:05pm

re: #233 Thanos

Energy is the biggest problem facing us and the world in coming years, bar none. Other problems might seem more urgent, but none is so important.

Or water.

But you need a lot of energy to desalinate water, ...

238 opnion  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:08:40pm

re: #229 derkrieger

Illegal immigration immigration is a tool used to implement socialism so yes, it is a major major issue.


Honestly, I think that it is about cheap labor & the destruction of the Midlle Class. An elite is much more elite without it. Just look at Mexico.

239 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:09:06pm

re: #215 Sharmuta

I think it's the job of the government to provide our national defense.

It is the job of the citizenry to wage the culture war.

That all depends who and what is controlling the interests of our government. In the realm of possibility, we have to aknowledge, a modern Democratic Party, victory, In the Senate, House, Executive, and Legislative. Ie. A Marxist president and an entitelist race baiting wife, A looney liberal dominated Senate and House, and 2 freshly appointed Chicago native revolutionary justices.

240 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:09:41pm

On top of that if you are worried about illegal immigration, you better watch who you are electing at the local levels. (city, county, state.) The most effective, and the most inneffective things done to control illegal immigration are happening at local levels. If you are waiting for the Feds to save us somehow, you better not hold your breath.

241 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:10:03pm

re: #224 Killian Bundy

Even that will quickly evaporate. They have large families and each generation inherits a watered down version of previous wealth.

242 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:10:33pm

OK, who here is prepared to run for Congress in 2010? Come on, you know you want to! Unfortunately we've missed the window for this year. But to all and sundry LGF'rs, think about it.

243 Alouette  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:10:48pm

re: #214 Killian Bundy

Muslims feel like 'Jews of Europe'

/you know, except for the extermination camps

Like the Jews of Europe were kidnapping Christians and sawing their heads off, crashing mass transportation into landmark structures, blowing themselves up in beer halls and kindergartens.

244 Dr. Shalit  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:11:14pm

re: #16 Racer X

M M M My Sharia!

"Racer"

MORE SHARONA = less sha'aria. Good Move.

-S-

245 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:11:26pm

re: #241 Killgore Trout

Even that will quickly evaporate. They have large families and each generation inherits a watered down version of previous wealth.

Couple of trillion dollars takes a lot of watering down.

246 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:11:53pm

re: #237 itellu3times

Or water.

But you need a lot of energy to desalinate water, ...

Regardless of what it is, most problems go back to energy, Food, fuel, water, clean environment, education, infrastructure, wealth, and anything else we might care about become easier to gain in an energy abundant environment.

247 opnion  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:11:56pm

re: #243 Alouette

Like the Jews of Europe were kidnapping Christians and sawing their heads off, crashing mass transportation into landmark structures, blowing themselves up in beer halls and kindergartens.


Look, they always rush to this hyperbole. It works

248 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:12:04pm

re: #239 Egfrow

Imagine if the electorate thought they should just retreat into isolationism concerning elections and the government....

Oh wait- they did that two years ago and we got Speaker pelosi.

249 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:12:29pm

re: #214 Killian Bundy

Muslims feel like 'Jews of Europe'

/you know, except for the extermination camps

no they don't. they're liars trying to get traction off the suffering of jews.

250 DerKrieger  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:12:44pm

re: #238 opnion

Honestly, I think that it is about cheap labor & the destruction of the Midlle Class. An elite is much more elite without it. Just look at Mexico.

The business elite do themselves NO favors by supporting illegal immigration. They may benefit in the short term but in the long term if illegals gain citizenship and vote Democrat, as they are wont, then socialism will continue to the detriment of the businesses that supported and encouraged illegal immigration.

251 ted  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:12:44pm

Discussion of Human Rights Abuses Under Sharia Law now Banned at UN Human Rights Council:

252 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:12:45pm

I haven't gone through the thread, so pardon any repetition--although think I may be alone in this.


‘Those entering into a contractual agreement can agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.’

Technically, I think he is correct, but only to a point. If you and I agree to a contract, we may include in the terms of the contract that there will be no interest charged for the loan, but that late payment will cost you an extra goat. We may not, however, substitute one of your hands as a penalty for a late payment.

This contract will be enforceable under the laws of the land because we agreed to these terms beforehand, and none of the terms are otherwise in violation of existing law.
I do not know if "arbitration" is codified in English or American law, but it is often specified in a contract as the primary method for resolving any disputes which arise from the actions contracted. That means that arbitration has been agreed to as governing the contract rather than English law.

I believe that there are two really salient points to this: First, nothing in the arbitration is allowed to violate existing law, and second, if arbitration breaks down, existing law remains available as a final recourse. I know that the contracts say "arbitration as the sole recourse" or some such thing, but lawsuits can and do arise from failed arbitration.

FINALLY, I think that this represents a great opportunity for us. A case arising on this point would offer the chance to put some real fences around creeping Sharia. This would allow Jurists to spell out the extent to which Sharia may be applied, and the nature of its interaction with English law. Or American, for that matter. Using precedents such as decisions regarding arbitration and religious law would be the perfect opportunity to limit the so-far unchecked depredations of this legal-political-religious hydra.

253 hl mencken  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:12:48pm

to paraphrase cheap trick.....

"ya (burqua clad) mama's alright, your (sharia espousing) daddy's alright, they're both just a little weird, surrender (you feckless eurowienies), SURRENDER!"

254 Alouette  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:13:12pm

re: #249 nyc redneck

no they don't. they're liars trying to get traction off the suffering of jews.

Holocaust envy.

255 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:13:53pm

re: #234 Petero

re: #90 Killgore Trout
I dont disagree, I am just telling you how it is here. To be clear there are areas of Jewish law around divorce which are problematic when held up to scrutiny according to Canadian law. It is not an easy marriage (pardon the pun), but the rules should apply across the board.

Religious Jews' attempts to have the civil courts enforce religious agreements and mediations/arbitrations has been rejected by the government, at least in Ontario. Same for Sharia. At least for the time being.

256 DerKrieger  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:14:29pm

re: #242 itellu3times

OK, who here is prepared to run for Congress in 2010? Come on, you know you want to! Unfortunately we've missed the window for this year. But to all and sundry LGF'rs, think about it.

I plan to run against Vic Snyder in 2010. I was going to this year but the local GOP is weak and disorganized. I hope to change that.

257 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:15:01pm

re: #236 Sharmuta

I perfectly agree, We got lucky because of the Internet. The Liberal planners did not see that one coming and underestimated it. This goes back to the revolutionary sentiments of Thomas J. in regards to the effect of giving many of the Colonies free reign access to Printing presses. The other lucky move was that of the Discarded medium of Radio. The got caught from both sides. The New and the Old were unforeseen. The elitists were moving away from Radio and into video and TV. The tide is indeed turning. But we are currently out organized and out manned.

258 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:15:13pm

re: #223 Paul

Lord Phillips is just another upper class twit. The British ruling class is the enemy of the ordinary Englishman.

Exactly, when Lord Fwillips states "Sharia Law is alright with me" what he means is "Its alright for them(muslims) as long as doesnt interfere with my gin and tonic."

When they take control by sheer demographics, and do it through the ballot box, then he gunna find a small problem in his very own back country garden, cucumber sandwiches and all.

Hi Sharmuta, howzit?

259 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:15:20pm

Good evening all y'all - I'm late to the party once again! How is everyone doing and what have I missed?!

260 opnion  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:15:43pm

re: #250 DerKrieger

The business elite do themselves NO favors by supporting illegal immigration. They may benefit in the short term but in the long term if illegals gain citizenship and vote Democrat, as they are wont, then socialism will continue to the detriment of the businesses that supported and encouraged illegal immigration.


That makes sense, but they do not & never have taken the long view.
It is about immediate margins & if they destroy capitalism,we will suffer more than them.

261 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:16:10pm

re: #252 MajorPribluda

I hope you read the thread and reconsider based on muslimas not fully understanding their rights and the probability of their coercion.

262 swamprat  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:16:25pm

The judge is a wanker. This isolates the muslim population even further. It expresses bigotry in that the ruling shows a lack of interest in the muslim population(imagine if any other group, such as blacks, chinese, or women were left to fend for themselves legally). It shows a lack of compassion, especially in womens' matters. It implies retreat to those who are pushing an agenda from foreign lands. It sets a dubious precedent in that those from any other culture can now claim the right to be judged according to the laws of their homeland, out of fairness.

What a can of worms.

263 jcbunga  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:16:58pm

Some words of inspiration to those Brits who still have a backbone, words that still inspire:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. "

Happy Birthday America.

264 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:17:07pm

OT: Blackfive asks for messages of thanks to be sent to another Judge, who did the right thing today:
"Judge Larson has released Sergeants Nelson and Weemer to the Marine Corps."
[Link: www.blackfive.net...]

265 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:17:20pm

re: #260 opnion Hey opnion, that has been a valid criticism of most American businesses for quite a while now: they're idea of "long term planning" is planning for the 3rd quarter while still in the first.

266 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:18:21pm

re: #246 Thanos

Regardless of what it is, most problems go back to energy.

True, but frankly, it's a problem easily enough fixed, once we get off our duffs.

Shale oil and coal gasification for the next century, orbital solar in the long term, fission in the short term, fusion if we can ever figure it out. There is no *technical* problem getting all the energy we need, it is all political at this point. Bites, don't it?

Windmills, biomass, these are just for style points, really low-tech and awkward. More efficient (eg, lighter weight) cars would help a lot.

In two hundred years, our descendants will look back at the current fuss about oil in total bemusement. It's also a good source of feedstock for chemicals and plastics, but for energy? Geez, great-nth grandpa, what where you thinking?

267 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:18:29pm

re: #259 realwest

Good evening all y'all - I'm late to the party once again! How is everyone doing and what have I missed?!


You are late, Real. Go stand in the corner. Now, if it was sharia, it would be 200 lashings, and not of whipped cream.

268 opnion  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:18:36pm

re: #265 realwest

Hey opnion, that has been a valid criticism of most American businesses for quite a while now: they're idea of "long term planning" is planning for the 3rd quarter while still in the first.
Hi Real, ya just nailed it.

269 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:19:17pm

re: #261 Sharmuta
Hi Sharm - hey, whatever happened to the ducklings stuck in the sewer drain?

270 DerKrieger  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:19:27pm

A message to any Brits reading - REMEMBER

271 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:19:33pm

Awright. I'll say up front here that I'm playing devil's advocate, here.

So. Here we go.

Is it possible that:

1. His Honor Lord Chief Reverend Sir Duke isn't advocating anything that's so outlandish, because

2. Matters of family and marriage have fallen under religious purview for a long, long time, and

3. Such purview exists now in other places, under other religions, which is regarded as no problem as long as

4. It doesn't contradict or preempt the law of the land. English law, in this case.

Any thoughts?

272 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:20:04pm

re: #262 swamprat

The judge is a wanker. .

Quite probably the truest thing we know about him.

273 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:20:41pm

re: #267 A Kiwi Infidel
Huh, if it was sharia I'd be dead, long before I showed up tonight.

274 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:20:45pm

Well, I;m cutting out for a few hours. I may be back later in another thread. God Bless and Happy 4th of July my fellow patriots! This was great and I'm still sad and disappointed with the state of Europe. You can't help the unwilling.

275 opnion  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:21:08pm

Good night lizards. I wish that our leaders had the morality & clarity of thought that you do.

276 DerKrieger  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:21:39pm

re: #271 Cognito

Awright. I'll say up front here that I'm playing devil's advocate, here.
Any thoughts?

Yes, a foot in the door is attached to a body on the other side.

277 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:21:55pm

And this just in -

It's nearly the 4th of July here...

...and Google still looks the same.

278 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:22:07pm

re: #273 realwest

Huh, if it was sharia I'd be dead, long before I showed up tonight.

how so?

279 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:22:11pm

re: #259 realwest

Real! Plenty of ranting (including mine which noone read) about this asshole British chief judge who acts like he's running for office in some third world Muslim country.

280 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:22:25pm

re: #274 Egfrow

Well, I;m cutting out for a few hours. I may be back later in another thread. God Bless and Happy 4th of July my fellow patriots! This was great and I'm still sad and disappointed with the state of Europe. You can't help the unwilling.

And there is a deeper truth in that statement as well. Goodnight and happy Independence Day.

281 BignJames  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:22:27pm

Wonder what Google's doing for the 4th?

282 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:22:47pm

re: #274 Egfrow
and
re: #275 opnion

Goodnight to each of you - hope it wasn't something I said! And if I don't see you tomorrow, Happy Independence Day!

283 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:23:02pm

re: #275 opnion

Good night lizards. I wish that our leaders had the morality & clarity of thought that you do.


'nite

284 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:23:19pm

re: #257 Egfrow

We have no choice but to keep going. Every little bit helps- for example, I recently convinced my boss to quit purchasing the paper by pointing out he could get every article online for free at work since the company pays for our internet. I used multiple arguments such as his wasting money on sections he wasn't even reading and the environmental waste generated by the paper. After a week, he stopped coming in with the paper and now pulls it up online. Yeah- he may be getting his news from the same source, but it just that much less money they're generating from their traditional sources.

285 BignJames  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:23:41pm

re: #277 Cartman


Hey!

286 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:24:12pm

re: #279 sparrowlake

i read your posts.
lol,ok?

287 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:24:55pm

re: #285 BignJames

LOL

288 Egfrow  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:25:01pm

re: #282 realwest

Nah, just have domestic activities to take care of, (Prepping and marinating my steaks for the grill on the 4th.)

289 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:25:36pm

re: #278 nyc redneck
Well you know that old saying: "They can have my gun when they pry it from my cold, dead hands?"
Just substitute our Consitution for gun.
Here it is on the eve of one of the most significant days in the history of the world, and this wanker judge thinks it's ok to have sharia law govern certain aspects of muslim life in Great Britain. NOT HERE.
NEVER.

290 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:25:39pm

re: #286 nyc redneck

i read your posts.
lol,ok?

Did I ever tell you I like go-go boots? LOL.

291 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:25:43pm

re: #285 BignJames

Hey!

re: #287 Cartman

LOL


Wots this then? a bit of nudge nudge wink wink?

292 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:26:08pm

Here's the answer to why we should never retreat to isolationism, and why we must always persist. I came across this looking for flag images.

[Link: lib.store.yahoo.net...]

293 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:26:27pm

re: #269 realwest

Hi Sharm - hey, whatever happened to the ducklings stuck in the sewer drain?

Sadly, we couldn't retrieve him. He left the well and entered the tunnels. We could hear him, but couldn't reach him. I left some bread chunks in the hopes he'll stay in the same area for more food, and we'll see in a day or two if we can't get him. I checked on him earlier this evening and it was quite down there, but it did look like he got some food at least and I'm hoping he was just sleeping.

294 AuldTrafford  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:26:45pm

I haven't read this whole thread - just driving by - but I think this is a bit of a tempest in a teapot. The Lord Chief is really saying nothing new. English contract common law is essentially law which applies to contracts only when a contract is silent on how a particular provision of it should be interpreted, or how it should operate in a given circumstance. (All these cases arise in the context of a private dispute about an agreed relationship.)

A lot of this sort of interpretive law has been "put on the books" by common (i.e., judge-made, as opposed to legislative) law because it is nearly impossible for private parties to anticipate all the eventualities that can arise during a contractual relationship. That same law recognizes that parties in a free society can agree to govern their relationships pretty much any way they please - subject, of course to the rights of third parties, and the criminal law.

In essence, then, all he's saying (as far as I can tell from the report in the article) is that a "rule of interpretation" that the parties can agree to is Sharia law. Nothing really new there. Parties could also agree to have their contract construed according to Christian canonical laws - or the laws of any religion. Again - provided they don't offend other substantive laws pertaining to the rights of others.

It's the hallmark of a free society.

If it puts women, for instance, at a disadvantage - well, they should not agree to it. Nothing the Chief says leads me to believe he thinks anyone should be coerced into such an agreement.

295 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:27:57pm

re: #288 Egfrow

Nah, just have domestic activities to take care of, (Prepping and marinating my steaks for the grill on the 4th.)

Sigh. I have to attend a family get-together tomorrow with no grill. It's blasphemy, I tells ya. I'm thinking of bringing my own steaks and the Smokey Joe.

296 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:28:27pm

re: #271 Cognito

And... he doesn't know a fucking thing about sharia law?

297 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:28:36pm

re: #289 realwest

Well you know that old saying: "They can have my gun when they pry it from my cold, dead hands?"
Just substitute our Consitution for gun.
Here it is on the eve of one of the most significant days in the history of the world, and this wanker judge thinks it's ok to have sharia law govern certain aspects of muslim life in Great Britain. NOT HERE.
NEVER.

i've taken the liberty to repost your great statement.
i concur.

298 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:29:06pm

re: #294 AuldTrafford

If it puts women, for instance, at a disadvantage - well, they should not agree to it. Nothing the Chief says leads me to believe he thinks anyone should be coerced into such an agreement.

I think as far as shari'a family law is concerned, coercion of the female is the norm and not the exception.

299 Reno911  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:29:13pm

Guns and Guitars. That's all I need.

Love the Doobie Brothers riff in the headline Charles.

300 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:29:31pm

re: #290 sparrowlake

Did I ever tell you I like go-go boots? LOL.

you should see me in those boots ;)

301 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:29:35pm

re: #289 realwest

Makes me very glad we broke away from Britain, back in 1776. Happy Fourth of July!

302 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:29:39pm

re: #295 Cartman

Sigh. I have to attend a family get-together tomorrow with no grill. It's blasphemy, I tells ya. I'm thinking of bringing my own steaks and the Smokey Joe.

I have to leave my smoker home, but the good news is that my dad has one just like it, and he's been cooking the barbeque sauce for two days.

303 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:30:12pm

re: #292 Thanos Caption for that photo, please?

304 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:30:19pm

"If it puts women, for instance, at a disadvantage - well, they should not agree to it."
This is the fundamental problem with mixing it in with English law. Sharia law does not treat people as equals, but sets up a system of precedence.

305 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:30:55pm

re: #303 realwest

Caption for that photo, please?

It's a bullet riddled flag flying half-mast over Buchenwald.

306 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:31:08pm

re: #294 AuldTrafford

Nothing the Chief says leads me to believe he thinks anyone should be coerced into such an agreement.

He is supposed to be a Judge, not a political hack for Muslim interests.

307 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:31:32pm

re: #298 Sharmuta

Furthermore, under Shari'a law, honor killings are sanctioned in order to bring women into line. Under Shari'a, women either obey Shari'a law, or they're killed. They don't have an opportunity not to opt into it. (And is the British judicial system going to approve such killings now, if the women killed are Moslems who, supposedly, agreed to Shari'a law?)

308 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:31:40pm

re: #294 AuldTrafford
"Nothing the Chief says leads me to believe he thinks anyone should be coerced into such an agreement."
But what about Islamic culture, custom and belief? Do you really believe that a Muslim woman is "free" to determine the terms of her marriage contract under Sharia law?

309 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:31:47pm

re: #256 DerKrieger

I plan to run against Vic Snyder in 2010. I was going to this year but the local GOP is weak and disorganized. I hope to change that.

What's a Vic Snyder?

[Link: www.house.gov...]
[Link: en.wikipedia.org...]
[Link: projects.washingtonpost.com...]
[Link: projects.washingtonpost.com...]

Well, he seems to be not the worst in the place, but if you're serious, I hope you can reach out to the blogosphere generally as things get rolling. Never too early to get your own web site started, at least as a private resource?

310 Da_Beerfreak  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:32:01pm

re: #295 Cartman

Sigh. I have to attend a family get-together tomorrow with no grill. It's blasphemy, I tells ya. I'm thinking of bringing my own steaks and the Smokey Joe.

Why not?
Show the Bums how to do it the right way!
// {;-)™

311 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:32:11pm

re: #306 sparrowlake

And, of course, under Shari'a, women are coerced into obeying all the time.

312 snowtravel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:32:32pm

re: #252 MajorPribluda

I'm not sure I take your point, but if you're saying that arbitration laws generally in effect in America will prevent the present British outcome stateside, you're unfortunately mistaken.

Parties to a contract can (and do) choose their rules, subject to few practical limitations. Hint: judges love to move paper off their desks, and onto someone elses's. Referral to private arbitral fora lets them do so.

This may merely reflect the logical result of decades of American antipathy toward civil lawsuits at public expense: Fire a lawyer, hire a cleric.

313 AuldTrafford  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:33:46pm

re: #298 Sharmuta

I think as far as shari'a family law is concerned, coercion of the female is the norm and not the exception.

You're undoubtedly correct, but the Chief is saying Shari'a does not apply until both parties have - freely - agreed to it.

And the "freely" is "freely" according to the prevailing secular law - English law - because it is a rule relating to the formation of the contract (its basic validity), not its interpretation.

I'm admittedly interpolating a bit here, because the article isn't exhaustive. I'm guiding myself a bit by trying to make his comments sensible. And they are if my reading is correct.

314 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:34:03pm

re: #307 TalkinKamel

Exactly- that's why I said earlier it's a gross assumption to believe the woman entered the contract with understanding as well as a dereliction in the duty of the western government to secure her rights under the laws of her western nation.

315 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:34:14pm

re: #303 realwest

American Flag at half mast, Buchenwald.

316 DerKrieger  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:34:59pm

re: #309 itellu3times

Snyder supports amnesty and opposes drilling in the US. He won't sign the discharge petition for the SAVE Act or for the Broadcaster Freedom Act. I call his office every day of the week to ask that he does. He is a Pelosi toady.

317 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:35:08pm

"My wife Aisha freely enters into this contract, in which she is responsible for my debts. Yes, she is of age, here is a sworn statement from her village elders."

318 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:35:13pm

re: #313 AuldTrafford

A muslima has no right except to say she's excepted shari'a willingly.

319 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:35:53pm

re: #311 TalkinKamel

And, of course, under Shari'a, women are coercedthreatened with physical violence and death into obeying all the time.

I believe "coerced" is too soft a term

320 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:36:02pm

re: #311 TalkinKamel

And, of course, under Shari'a, women are coerced into obeying all the time.

So, what's the legal remedy?

/under English law, in England

321 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:36:28pm

re: #313 AuldTrafford


I'm admittedly interpolating a bit here, because the article isn't exhaustive. I'm guiding myself a bit by trying to make his comments sensible. And they are if my reading is correct.

I was doing the same thing in post 271.

The key here, it seems, is the primacy of English law.

322 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:37:10pm

re: #316 DerKrieger

Snyder supports amnesty and opposes drilling in the US. He won't sign the discharge petition for the SAVE Act or for the Broadcaster Freedom Act. I call his office every day of the week to ask that he does. He is a Pelosi toady.

You run, and get that bum out of office. Good on ya!

323 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:37:15pm

re: #318 Sharmuta

A muslima has no right except to say she's excepted shari'a willingly.


I presume you mean "accepted".

But how can they accept when at birth they have no mental capacity to do so, just sayin

324 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:38:20pm

re: #323 A Kiwi Infidel

Yeah- I did mean accept.

325 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:38:35pm

re: #307 TalkinKamel

Furthermore, under Shari'a law, honor killings are sanctioned in order to bring women into line. Under Shari'a, women either obey Shari'a law, or they're killed. They don't have an opportunity not to opt into it. (And is the British judicial system going to approve such killings now, if the women killed are Moslems who, supposedly, agreed to Shari'a law?)

Eh?

No. I'm not sure about this judge's deal, here, but I'm pretty darned confident that English law forbids murder.

326 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:39:18pm

re: #325 Cognito

Eh?

No. I'm not sure about this judge's deal, here, but I'm pretty darned confident that English law forbids murder.

Precious good that law does once the woman is dead, huh?

327 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:39:25pm

re: #325 Cognito

How about assimilating, or hitting the f*cking road?

328 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:39:29pm

Sharia, even for contract law, introduces fatwas. Fatwas introduce control by clergy, an millimeter of Sharia outside the muslim community is two kilometers of power within the muslim community.

329 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:39:43pm

re: #295 Cartman
Hi there my friend - yes, I know I do owe you a long e-mail, but there is a short one in your in-box now!

330 AuldTrafford  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:40:10pm

re: #318 Sharmuta

A muslima has no right except to say she's excepted shari'a willingly.

I understand. All I'm saying is I think it's fair - given the uncertain nature of the report - to assume the Chief is only talking about Shari'a as a rule of interpretation. Formation - basic validity - is still a matter of English law. If the female is coerced into an "agreement" it is not enforceable.

I can't read his mind. I'm just saying, if that's what he meant, it's not a big deal. If, as you assume, he's going to judge basic elements of contract formation by Shari'a - that's a problem.

331 Macker  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:40:11pm

re: #16 Racer X

M M M My Sharia!

C'mon! Cool your jets! Mediate! Eat a hamburger!
Don't get us too upset or we'll do something nuclear!
Bye-ya-ya-atollah!

/Steve_Dahl

332 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:40:15pm

re: #326 Sharmuta

Precious good that law does once the woman is dead, huh?

Well that's true regardless, isn't it?

333 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:40:51pm

re: #327 Noam Sayin'

How about assimilating, or hitting the f*cking road?

LOL, well, i think that sums it up.

334 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:40:55pm

re: #314 Sharmuta

I really don't see any points where Shari'a law and British common law come together. The two seem diametrically opposed to each other---the contrasting status of women under the two legal systems being just one example. I don't think trying to integrate the two is going to work.

335 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:41:14pm

re: #327 Noam Sayin'

How about assimilating, or hitting the f*cking road?

I can get behind that argument, although it makes things a bit rough for the other people mentioned in point 3 of post 271.

336 BignJames  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:41:15pm

re: #327 Noam Sayin'

Oughta change its nic to "Pita"

337 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:41:56pm

re: #327 Noam Sayin'

How about assimilating, or hitting the f*cking road?

You need to change your icon

338 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:42:54pm

re: #332 Cognito

I just don't think laws against murder are enough for muslimas to find the strength to reject shari'a family law and risk "honor" killings upon themselves.

339 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:43:07pm

Viewers complain about BBC footage of dead Palestinian

The BBC Ten O' Clock News sparked more than 150 complaints after showing footage of a Palestinian being shot dead while driving a bulldozer into traffic on a busy street in Jerusalem.

Viewers said they were shocked that the corporation broadcast the moment that Hussam Dwaith, 31, was killed at point blank range.

Too [expletive deleted] bad.

/AND IT'S NOT A BULLDOZER, it's a front end loader, kind of like the difference between a tank and a self-propelled howitzer that the media can't tell the difference between either

340 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:43:09pm

re: #311 TalkinKamel

And, of course, under Shari'a, women are coerced into obeying all the time.

Yes, coercion of women in Islamist communities is pervasive and systemic. And the consequences of a refusal to sign a Sharia matrimonial property settlement are for the woman to be treated like a pariah in the community. Also, the consequences of a refusal to sign Sharia business contracts would likely include being blacklisted or otherwise financially penalized. This Judge is such an asshole.

341 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:43:37pm

re: #301 TalkinKamel
Hey, same to you Fritzie my friend!

342 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:44:14pm

re: #325 Cognito

English law forbids it. Shari'a, on the other hand, encourages it, in cases where an Islamic man's, or an Islamic family's, "honor" is supposedly at stake. This is where the fit is going to hit the shan. The British courts are either going to have to admit they really don't support Shari'a law completely after all, or they'll have to either ignore, or approve, honor killings (which they tend to turn a blind eye to already.)

343 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:44:33pm

re: #314 Sharmuta

Exactly- that's why I said earlier it's a gross assumption to believe the woman entered the contract with understanding as well as a dereliction in the duty of the western government to secure her rights under the laws of her western nation.

You are spot on.

344 AuldTrafford  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:44:34pm

re: #321 Cognito

I was doing the same thing in post 271.

The key here, it seems, is the primacy of English law.

Yes. I hadn't read the thread when I made my #294. I did look back, and I agree with you.

345 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:44:35pm

re: #305 Thanos Thank you for posting that - the photo and the "caption".

346 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:44:39pm

re: #338 Sharmuta

I just don't think laws against murder are enough for muslimas to find the strength to reject shari'a family law and risk "honor" killings upon themselves.

My question, then, is what prevents those honor killings now?

Do you really think murderous men are restraining themselves because the English legal system hasn't yet recognized sharia in matters of family and marriage?

347 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:45:09pm

re: #329 realwest

And a short reply right back at ya!

348 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:45:31pm

re: #328 Thanos

Sharia, even for contract law, introduces fatwas. Fatwas introduce control by clergy, an millimeter of Sharia outside the muslim community is two kilometers of power within the muslim community.

What are you going to do about it, realistically?

/they refuse, as a community, to conform

349 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:45:54pm

re: #335 Cognito

Tough.

350 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:45:57pm

re: #339 Killian Bundy

Viewers complain about BBC footage of dead Palestinian


Too [expletive deleted] bad.

/AND IT'S NOT A BULLDOZER, it's a front end loader, kind of like the difference between a tank and a self-propelled howitzer that the media can't tell the difference between either

Looks like no one was complaining about seeing a Pali murder innocent Israelis on TV.

351 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:45:58pm

re: #345 realwest

Thank you for posting that - the photo and the "caption".

Welcome friend.

352 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:46:03pm

re: #341 realwest

{realwest!}

353 Penny T. Wienerdog  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:46:11pm

When will the Brits take back their country?

354 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:46:37pm

re: #338 Sharmuta

Battered wives who grow up in western culture are intimidated into silence, intimidation and crimes go unreported every day. How much more silence there must be in a cultural environment which tells you from the beginning that you're worth less.

355 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:47:02pm

re: #315 Noam Sayin'
HEY NOAM! Yes, Thanos was kind enough to tell me that.
I'm glad I revealed my ignorance to obtain that information.

356 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:47:05pm

re: #342 TalkinKamel

English law forbids it. Shari'a, on the other hand, encourages it, in cases where an Islamic man's, or an Islamic family's, "honor" is supposedly at stake. This is where the fit is going to hit the shan. The British courts are either going to have to admit they really don't support Shari'a law completely after all, or they'll have to either ignore, or approve, honor killings (which they tend to turn a blind eye to already.)

See point 4 of post 271:

(...is this conceivable if...) 4. It doesn't contradict or preempt the law of the land. English law, in this case.

357 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:47:11pm

re: #348 Killian Bundy

What are you going to do about it, realistically?

/they refuse, as a community, to conform

/we have Dearborn

358 ploome hineni[deleted]  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:48:41pm
359 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:48:43pm

re: #349 Noam Sayin'

Tough.

Might want to be a bit more circumspect, as some of the people I'm referring to are, among others, Jews.

If 'tough' is still the answer, I can see your argument. Just gotta find a consistent stance.

360 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:48:50pm

re: #355 realwest

You revealed no ignorance that I didn't also possess. I caught a bit of the title in the url.

How ya doin' tonight, my friend? Is Charlotte keeping you warm and cozy?

361 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:48:52pm

re: #348 Killian Bundy

What are you going to do about it, realistically?

/they refuse, as a community, to conform

The second generation can be saved, I don't believe they all refuse. Speaking of assimilation, never underestimate the power and attraction of the western world. When it comes to assimilation, we are the cultural borg. Everyone who hates us also loves us... it's a strange dichotomy that PJ O'Rourke remarked upon a couple times in "Give War a Chance".

362 RedPepper  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:49:13pm

re: #339 Killian Bundy

How many people did Hassam kill with the front-loader?

And were there any complaints from BBC viewers about how their deaths were covered?

/(just askin' ... )

363 Wilderstad  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:49:14pm

re: #314 Sharmuta
If I recall correctly, under Western common law, a contract cannot be made with a minor unless that minor is emancipated or if it's for items essential to life.

With Sharia law, the silence of a minor girl is considered consent to a marriage contract and her father, uncle, or other male keeper can make out that contract on her behalf. The girl doesn't even have to understand what's going on or enter into that contract freely.

The judge hasn't got a clue.

364 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:49:19pm

re: #314 Sharmuta

Exactly- that's why I said earlier it's a gross assumption to believe the woman entered the contract with understanding as well as a dereliction in the duty of the western government to secure her rights under the laws of her western nation.

Shar, I agree that there are other FUNDAMENTAL problems, but the Judge may be correct IF he is limiting his comments to meaning that the agreed-upon terms of a contract may be whatever the parties agree to, so long as the terms do not violate existing law.

The other fundamental problems need solving, but not by limiting the ability of every citizen to enter into contracts by agreement.

I would think that with the liberals' preference for declaring anybody who is guilty to have been incapable of understanding the consequences of his actions rather than culpable, that Muslim women would have an easy time of things in any courtroom sufficiently leftist.
/

I know why this would never fly, but imagine if the left were consistent?

365 itellu3times  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:49:29pm

re: #316 DerKrieger

Snyder supports amnesty and opposes drilling in the US. He won't sign the discharge petition for the SAVE Act or for the Broadcaster Freedom Act. I call his office every day of the week to ask that he does. He is a Pelosi toady.

Betcha he changes on drilling pretty quick, but as long as he runs around with that (D) after his name, he's going to have to take some bad positions, and that's enough reason to want him gone.

I know what a weak Republican district is like, my rep being Waxman, don't think he's had a serious Republican opponent, maybe ever.

366 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:49:39pm

re: #355 realwest

HEY NOAM! Yes, Thanos was kind enough to tell me that.
I'm glad I revealed my ignorance to obtain that information.

I shoulda posted more info, I thought it would be obvious from the URL, but forgot Charles trim code.

367 A Kiwi Infidel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:50:06pm

re: #338 Sharmuta

I just don't think laws against murder are enough for muslimas to find the strength to reject shari'a family law and risk "honor" killings upon themselves.


Correct me if I'm wrong, here, you appear to have an understanding of the dilemma facing women born into a muslim household.

Are they not valued the same as livestock?, Their worth is only in the ability to be able to breed more jihadii? Having been born muslim, thats it, there can be no choice, to leave, or even suggest leaving is the actions of an apostate, and death calls.

368 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:50:09pm

re: #353 Penny T. Wienerdog

When will the Brits take back their country?

/and exactly how will they do it, without forsaking their long cultural history of national tradition?

369 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:50:09pm

re: #346 Cognito

Do you really think introducing Shari'a into the Islamic legal system is going to help the current situation any? Don't you think that it might encourage many Islamic males, who actually might have been restraining themselves to a certain extent under the British legal system, to start acting more violently? Don't you think a lot of Moslem women, who might have immigrated to Britain in order to live a more free life might rightfully resent having the laws they fled from in their old homes imposed on them once more, when they thought they were safe?

And do you support the subjugation of women under Shari'a law?

370 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:51:11pm

With Sharia besides the fatwa, you also get Zakat.

371 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:51:20pm

re: #333 nyc redneck

LOL, well, i think that sums it up.


And quite nicely, too.
Anyone here familiar with British law? Is there any other religious group in Great Britain that enjoys the right to have it's religious laws applied, in lieu of English law?

372 swamprat  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:51:24pm

re: #318 Sharmuta

A muslima has no right except to say she's excepted shari'a willingly.

Not true. She may also say........ http://youtube.com/watch?v=0GqDzTCuUq0

373 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:52:03pm

re: #356 Cognito

Then, as I said, the British judges will be forced to admit that, no, Shari'a law really isn't compatible with British law.

So why is this judge encouraging the adoption of Shari'a law in the first place?

374 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:52:32pm

re: #371 realwest

I don't know, but I kind've suspect not.

375 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:52:37pm

re: #361 Thanos

The second generation can be saved, I don't believe they all refuse. Speaking of assimilation, never underestimate the power and attraction of the western world.

/let's hope so, the waiting is particularly costly and painful

376 Giya  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:52:58pm

Holy f****

The Magna Carta is officially dead. Forget binding the King to common law and providing common rights for citizens - apparently Muslims are above the law. Prince Charles should be pissed!

377 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:53:00pm

re: #354 jaunte

How much more silence there must be in a cultural environment which tells you from the beginning that you're worth less.

Coupled with intentionally keeping them ignorant of the few rights the koran does allow them. Hell- many of them have been so brainwashed they actually do think they want shari'a.

378 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:53:41pm

re: #365 itellu3times

Betcha he changes on drilling pretty quick


Yes, it's going to be very hard to win an election in this climate with his previously stated position that he won't make an effort to reduce gas prices. I suspect it will be the next policy thrown under the bus.

379 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:53:43pm

re: #371 realwest

Is there any other religious group in Great Britain that enjoys the right to have it's religious laws applied, in lieu of English law?

Soccer fans?

380 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:55:26pm

re: #369 TalkinKamel

Do you really think introducing Shari'a into the Islamic legal system is going to help the current situation any? Don't you think that it might encourage many Islamic males, who actually might have been restraining themselves to a certain extent under the British legal system, to start acting more violently?

This isn't a bad argument; the assumption, of course, is that these men are indeed restraining themselves for fear of running afoul of English law. However, if they are so sensitive as that, they would -- under the hypothetical in post 271 -- continue that behavior, as English law retains primacy.

Don't you think a lot of Moslem women, who might have immigrated to Britain in order to live a more free life might rightfully resent having the laws they fled from in their old homes imposed on them once more, when they thought they were safe?

I think that resentment is entirely possible. And I think it's wonderful.

And do you support the subjugation of women under Shari'a law?

Mm? This isn't a personal decision of mine. Although England is several time zones ahead, so maybe by morning they'll call for my opinion.

381 AuldTrafford  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:56:18pm

re: #379 Cartman

Soccer fans?

It's football, mate.

382 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:56:21pm

re: #363 Wilderstad

If I recall correctly, under Western common law, a contract cannot be made with a minor unless that minor is emancipated or if it's for items essential to life.

With Sharia law, the silence of a minor girl is considered consent to a marriage contract and her father, uncle, or other male keeper can make out that contract on her behalf. The girl doesn't even have to understand what's going on or enter into that contract freely.

The judge hasn't got a clue.

Now look at the opportunity that a legal case upon this point would provide. Imagine being able to invalidate huge swathes of Sharia under British and American law by having a few cases decided upon the merits of informed consent. If the right could just get its shit together for a moment and go on the offensive in some of these lawsuits...
Like it or not, these lawsuits are how America is being taken over by the left. The Supreme Court's Boumedienne decision overturned not only the express wishes of the executive and legislative branches, but even the previously held position of the judicial itself (through not granting certiorari). How did this happen? A chain of lawsuits and Justice Kennedy's penchant for making things up as he goes.

383 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:56:56pm

re: #371 realwest

And quite nicely, too.
Anyone here familiar with British law? Is there any other religious group in Great Britain that enjoys the right to have it's religious laws applied, in lieu of English law?

I believe some Jewish law stands aside -- not above -- English law, regarding marriage.

384 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:57:10pm

How can sharia possibly comply with the common law? What it amounts to is introducing privilege - private law - for one group.

That way lies madness and disaster.

385 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:57:12pm

re: #271 Cognito

Actually, Shari'a marriage laws come in conflict with British marriage laws in way the Christian and Jewish marriage laws really don't. (Age of consent for one thing.) Not to mention the laws about rape; in Shari'a, you need four adult male witnesses to prove rape.

Do you approve of women being made to live under Shari'a law?

386 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:57:34pm

re: #364 MajorPribluda

But isn't the agreement of the contract stipulated that both parties not only understand the terms of the contract but that no coercion has taken place?

387 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:57:55pm

re: #360 Noam Sayin'
It is indeed keeping me warm, my friend, but otherwise no complaints! Tomorrow is my absolute favorite holiday of the year (excepting Christmas) and I'm really looking forward to it!
And how are you doing tonight? Weather improved enough for you to use that scooter on any kind of consistent basis?

388 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:58:10pm

re: #383 Cognito

Do you know which aspects?

389 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:58:16pm

re: #381 AuldTrafford

It's football, mate.

I know. A Brit ManU co-worker reminded me of that - constantly. ;)

390 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:58:47pm

re: #359 Cognito

Yes, I understand that. But when your cultural standards are as draconian as that of the muslim world, we'd only be doing them a favor by updating their standard of decency by about 1300 years.

And in truth, I have no issues with the way other cultural groups behave in America to a great extent. But the argument has been made by the dramatic leaps and bound America has made in 200+ years by assimilating its citizenry to the common good of the country. I made a rant some time ago about immigrants of long ago versus today. It went a little something like this...

*musses hair*

Do you remember when immigrants actually appreciated being able to enter America? Many of them thought it was somewhat of an honor changing their names to John Smith, or simplifying their difficult sir names – Americanizing them, if you will to a more English-friendly spelling. Often, Peddersen, Petersen, Petjersen and many other iterations would become simply, Peterson. First names were often made ‘America-Friendly’ with people simply calling themselves John, Joe, Dave, etc.

I myself am only a few generations removed from my immigrant grandparents and great-grandparents, who come from Ireland, Germany and somewhere in Ukraine, Romania, we’re really not sure – they were also without papers (psst… illegal aliens). But my grandfather changed the spelling of his name to Joseph. That’s not how they spelled it in the home-country. It’s not even really how they pronounced it. But he was happy to be in America.

Why?

Because their countries sucked, that’s why. My Irish ancestors had to deal with British imperialism, and were faced with conversion to Protestantism or starve during the potato famine. Germany in the early 1900s? Ppht! Ukraine and/or Romania (we really don’t know exactly where they came from – they were gypsies)? Shit-holes, compared to America. In fact, even though America was just a few decades removed from the Civil War, it was a far better place than anywhere in the world, and people would do anything to get here. There was no freedom anywhere but America. Some families would split up – some could go, some couldn’t. Imagine that decision; sending your wife and daughters to an entirely new world while you and your sons tried to earn enough more money to eventually join them. Some succeeded, many didn’t.

And when you got here…

And when you got here, you did everything you could to make it. The Irish weren’t exactly welcomed to these shores. There are plenty of books written on how the Irish were treated in this country. I’m not going to go into it. I’m too fortunate for the people who came before me to bitch about it now. Maybe less so, but it was pretty much the same for other immigrants. You were welcome, but not that welcome.

And that was the impetus to conform. Your name was adsfuio in your old country? Well, it’s “Joe,” now. Get used to it or your last name is Smith. Come to think of it, your name is now Joe Smith. Here’s a shovel. Get off the fuckin’ boat and start working.

And you did. You did anything and everything to make it in America. Why? Because you could make it in America. None of that bullshit back home mattered anymore. You were now an American, shovel in hand, digging dirt, and eating your cabbage soup. That cabbage soup never tasted so good.

It was never easy for an immigrant in those days. Street signs were in English. Job applications were in English. Government documents were in English. You spoke English. You conducted business in English. Sure, when you’re home, with your immigrant friends, you conversed in German, Russian, Spanish, Lithuanian, Swedish, Norwegian, whatever. But when you were out and about, English was the language of commerce.

It’s called assimilation...

391 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:59:17pm

re: #385 TalkinKamel

Actually, Shari'a marriage laws come in conflict with British marriage laws in way the Christian and Jewish marriage laws really don't. (Age of consent for one thing.) Not to mention the laws about rape; in Shari'a, you need four adult male witnesses to prove rape.


Here again, requirement No. 4 from post 271:

"4. It doesn't contradict or preempt the law of the land. English law, in this case."

Do you approve of women being made to live under Shari'a law?

And again:

"Mm? This isn't a personal decision of mine. Although England is several time zones ahead, so maybe by morning they'll call for my opinion."

392 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:59:24pm

re: #346 Cognito

My question, then, is what prevents those honor killings now?

Do you really think murderous men are restraining themselves because the English legal system hasn't yet recognized sharia in matters of family and marriage?

Good question , but one things for sure...if they accept shari'a law honor killings will be part of the contract. It will be open season on the female half of this contract.

393 formercorpsman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:59:33pm

re: #346 Cognito

Cognito, I think you are smarter than that post.

It is no surprise anymore, to anyone here, watching the western world capitulate in the name of multiculturalism, and to see this headline.

It is multi-directional encroachment upon a system that is gradually eroding at her foundation.

When the western world, in a socialist medical system, has the public at large, paying through the nose for this system, training future doctors who refuse to follow basic medical standards in their first year of training due to objections from outside intellect, there is a problem.

When you have the very same western world determining that free speech does not mean one can yell "fire" in a crowded movie theater as protected free speech, but on a public street, in protest, a religious person can hold a sign "behead those who insult islam" there is a problem.

What this ruling does, at it's core, is undermine the most softest of targets. It is the spring-board for a sub-section of society who have absolutely no respect for the culture they have chosen to live in. They seek to demean it.

Why are we not inundated with stories about non-muslims, not assimilating to islamic society?

Nobody in their right mind willingly wants to live under these conditions.

Come on man.

394 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 8:59:39pm

re: #388 Dianna

Do you know which aspects?

I can't remember the details, to be honest. I was hoping someone here might pop up with them.

395 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:00:18pm

I have huge issues with the notion of breaking the common law into group laws. It's taken centuries for women to simply have property rights that aren't tied to a man, and the right to an independent life in the law. Break that, and I'm no one and nothing.

396 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:00:24pm

re: #386 Sharmuta

But isn't the agreement of the contract stipulated that both parties not only understand the terms of the contract but that no coercion has taken place?

Yes. [grin]

Allow the contract as a legal document (if well-constructed, etc), but fight the cases on the grounds of informed consent.

397 The Other Les  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:01:30pm

Darn. It looks like almost every official between a dog catcher and The Queen needs to be replaced.


Oh, and here's a situation that kinda sucks, so to speak.

(And typing with one hand sucks too.)

398 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:01:54pm

re: #380 Cognito

Why is the women's resentment "wonderful"? Do you think it's "wonderful" that, just when they thought they'd moved to a free country, they find themselves oppressed under the very laws they fled once more?

And do you think their resentment is going to avail them much, if British courts start supporting Shari'a? "Oh, now, now, my dear lady, you married your husband under Shari'a law, so that's the law that must apply here, you know."

Do you support the subjugation of women under Shari'a law? (hey, it's not up to you, but you can have an opinion on it.)

(As for the males---well, there are already too many honor killings in Britain already. If they get the idea---rightly or wrongly---that English courts will support them when they commit such crimes, I think it's a pretty good assumption that such crimes will increase.)

399 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:01:57pm

re: #348 Killian Bundy
Hi Killian! You're correct that as a community they refuse to "join in" British life, society and culture.
But that shouldn't make them exempt from British Law and they ought not to have "special" laws that govern their conduct towards each other, especially if they are British citizens.
As to what to do about it, well the saying stay and assimilate or don't assimilate and leave.
Seems to me that waaaay back in 1860 nearly half of the United States didn't want to abide by the laws of the United States and that got resolved, albeit in a most bloody fashion.

400 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:01:59pm

re: #395 Dianna

I have huge issues with the notion of breaking the common law into group laws. It's taken centuries for women to simply have property rights that aren't tied to a man, and the right to an independent life in the law. Break that, and I'm no one and nothing.

You'll still have a great avatar. And that's not for nothing.

401 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:02:07pm

re: #386 Sharmuta

I don't think Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips is capable of understanding the coercion which has taken, is taking, and will take place.

402 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:02:16pm

re: #364 MajorPribluda

I would think that with the liberals' preference for declaring anybody who is guilty to have been incapable of understanding the consequences of his actions rather than culpable, that Muslim women would have an easy time of things in any courtroom sufficiently leftist.

You are dead wrong.
The woman would be in the position of having lost her case before the Sharia Court, and then having to muster the resources to litigate in the civil court. I suggest to you that most such women would not be willing or able to do so.
And there would be a presumption of regularity which she would also have to overcome by binging witnesses to court to try to prove that she was forced. Again, most such women would simply fold under the onerous burden of cost, time and stress.
Finally, such a woman would be ostracized by her community for daring to challenge the Imams.

403 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:02:19pm

re: #396 MajorPribluda

Yes. [grin]

Allow the contract as a legal document (if well-constructed, etc), but fight the cases on the grounds of informed consent.

But doesn't that require the female to later claim she was coerced? And doesn't that leave her in the same boat as rejecting the contract in the first place and risk "honor" killing?

404 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:02:56pm

Well, it's officially America's Independece Day (EST) and Google still looks the same.

Stinkin' leftists.

405 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:03:12pm

re: #371 realwest

And quite nicely, too.
Anyone here familiar with British law? Is there any other religious group in Great Britain that enjoys the right to have it's religious laws applied, in lieu of English law?

i think only islam insinuates itself around the world and drags its barbarian beliefs w/ it to this extent.
all my people who came here couldn't wait to be americans and happily abide by the rule of law inspired by our great founders.
they came w/ their enthusiasm to contribute and joy of their new found freedoms.
moslems come to push their own agenda.

406 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:03:24pm

re: #366 Thanos No, apparently Noam saw it in the url; I'm too stupid to even look at the url !

407 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:03:36pm

re: #391 Cognito

No, it's not your personal decision---did I say that it was? But, presumably, you have a brain, and you have an opinion on the subject. So, do you approve of the way women are subjugated under Shari'a law?

408 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:03:45pm

re: #392 jorline

Once, not long ago, in conversation with a young woman on a train, I brought up the honor killings in Dallas. She wanted to be compassionate to the father, because of his "culture".

If we don't hold everyone to one concept of right conduct, we're asking for different sentences for men and women.

409 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:03:50pm

re: #393 formercorpsman


Come on man.

I'm there, dude. Like I said in post 271, I'm just playing devil's advocate a bit on this issue. Helps to more sharply define a response, I think. Helps me, at least.

410 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:05:08pm

re: #387 realwest

Weather improved enough for you to use that scooter on any kind of consistent basis?

I put only 300 miles on it in the first two months I owned it. Then got an oil & gear lube change and put another 300 on it in the next week. I'm over 800 miles on it, and probably put maybe $50-60 bucks in gas into it.

I filled up the Jeep last Friday (over $60) and it's still sitting in the garage with a full tank of gas. I'll say I'm getting consistent use.

Got rained on once - with a hard cross-wind as I was crossing the Ford Parkway bridge over the Mississippi. Yikes!

411 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:05:09pm

re: #395 Dianna

I have huge issues with the notion of breaking the common law into group laws.

Mmm. Excellent.

As devil's advocate I'd say the group law here doesn't 'break' the common law, but only overlaps it. English law retains first order.

412 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:05:31pm

re: #394 Cognito

That doesn't seem like a very good idea.

413 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:05:34pm

re: #395 Dianna

I have huge issues with the notion of breaking the common law into group laws. It's taken centuries for women to simply have property rights that aren't tied to a man, and the right to an independent life in the law. Break that, and I'm no one and nothing.

That's a very good point. Could you imagine a Muslim women voluntarily going into an inheritance or a marriage dispute in a Sharia court? Her value is 1/3 rd of her adversary. The only reason she would do that is because of social family pressure or that the state sends her there. If we implemented this in the old south it would be the same situation; Slaves in dispute with their masters would be sent to courts that consider them less than human. It's complete insanity.

414 RedPepper  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:05:53pm

re: #404 Cartman

Well, it's officially America's Independece Day (EST) and Google still looks the same.

Stinkin' leftists.

Perhaps they are on PDT ?

/

415 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:05:53pm

And Cognito, read Sparrowlake's Post #402, which points out exactly why English law might not be the sturdy bulwark against injustice that you seem to think it would be.

Do you approve of the way Shari'a law subjugates women?

416 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:06:55pm

re: #407 TalkinKamel

No, it's not your personal decision---did I say that it was? But, presumably, you have a brain, and you have an opinion on the subject. So, do you approve of the way women are subjugated under Shari'a law?

I don't approve of anyone being subjugated under anything.

You have a way of asking questions that are so obvious as to be ridiculous. "Do you enjoy kicking old ladies in the shins? Eh? Eh?"

417 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:07:12pm

re: #374 TalkinKamel
{TalkinKamel} - and actually my question was nearly irrelevent as Sharia law contradict British common law insofar as the age of consent to enter into a contract goes, or whether or not a girl or woman has the right to not be literally given away in marriage, etc. etc.
If you want to live in a certain country, then, with all due respect, I submit that you ought to be willing to abide by that country's law. IF you aren't so willing then you should leave. Period.

418 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:08:00pm

re: #404 Cartman

Well, it's officially America's Independece Day (EST) and Google still looks the same.

Stinkin' leftists.

I think they tend to wait until the West Coast hits midnight.

419 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:08:21pm

re: #400 MajorPribluda

Thanks, but once we start breaking the single view of equality before the law, women like me might as well jump off a cliff.

420 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:09:05pm

re: #408 Dianna

Once, not long ago, in conversation with a young woman on a train, I brought up the honor killings in Dallas. She wanted to be compassionate to the father, because of his "culture".

If we don't hold everyone to one concept of right conduct, we're asking for different sentences for men and women.

I agree...remember this is the same culture who just got pissed because a puppy was displayed on a poster.

It should be equal for both male and female under the contract. It appears that shari'a law only benefits the male and that's bullshit!

421 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:09:29pm

re: #409 Cognito

I'm there, dude. Like I said in post 271, I'm just playing devil's advocate a bit on this issue. Helps to more sharply define a response, I think. Helps me, at least.

I think your constant "devil's advocate" strategy is less beneficial than you think, not only to the issue at hand on whatever given thread you decide to take this approach, but it also actually makes it more difficult for various other Lizards to take you seriously when you are engaged honestly on another topic on another thread.

Just some food for thought for you.

422 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:09:30pm

re: #398 TalkinKamel

Why is the women's resentment "wonderful"? Do you think it's "wonderful" that, just when they thought they'd moved to a free country, they find themselves oppressed under the very laws they fled once more?

And do you think their resentment is going to avail them much, if British courts start supporting Shari'a? "Oh, now, now, my dear lady, you married your husband under Shari'a law, so that's the law that must apply here, you know."

Do you support the subjugation of women under Shari'a law? (hey, it's not up to you, but you can have an opinion on it.)

(As for the males---well, there are already too many honor killings in Britain already. If they get the idea---rightly or wrongly---that English courts will support them when they commit such crimes, I think it's a pretty good assumption that such crimes will increase.)

Good grief. If you're going to try so hard -- so neck-twistingly hard -- to misinterpret what I say to you, the finest solution is to stop saying things to you.

423 formercorpsman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:09:42pm

re: #409 Cognito

Like Thanos pointed out, next comes Zakat.

I am extremely concerned about this.

It is the foundation for a civil war.

We are literally discussing the ability for certain groups to act outside the law, and essentially develop rights that other folks would not have.

I know I juxtaposition Britain and the U.S. in my arguments, but the western world decided centuries ago, inalienable rights were had by all.

This flies in the face of that.

424 DistantThunder  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:10:07pm

Owner of broken rifle surrenders for 30 month sentence

Gun misfires at a range and fires off three automatic shots then jams. Weapon has been recalled by manufacturer.


"A gun that malfunctions is not a machine gun," Larry Pratt, executive director of GOA, said. "What the [federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives] has done in the [David] Olofson case has set a precedent that could make any of the millions of Americans that own semi-automatic firearms suddenly the owner [of] an unregistered machine gun at the moment the gun malfunctions."

Officials with Gun Owners of America told WND they met with Olofson today before he surrendered to federal authorities for his prison term. U.S. District Judge Charles Clevert had imposed the sentence after the gun in question let loose three shots at a firing range.

"It didn't matter the rifle in question had not been intentionally modified for select fire, or that it did not have an M16 bolt carrier … that it did not show any signs of machining or drilling, or that that model had even been recalled a few years back," said a commentary in Guns Magazine on the case against Olofson, of Berlin, Wis.

425 Kragar (Proud to be Kafir)  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:10:18pm

I'm imaging a case like this:

A Brit (white) is approached by a Muslim with a business proposition.

The Muslim wants the contract to be negotiated by a Sharia court.

When the Brit declines, the Muslim screams Islamaphobia and the Brit is forced to enter the contract in the name of tolerance.

Later, when the contract is under dispute, the Brit tries to take it to court, but the Muslim decides it should be taken to a Sharia court. The Brit balks, again, seething ensues.

One land, one law. Dont like it? Leave.

426 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:10:23pm

re: #414 RedPepper

Perhaps they are on PDT ?

/

Oh, I'm just havin' fun with it. I'm sure they'll post something, not out of patriotic pride, but moreso just to avoid the criticism.

427 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:10:44pm

re: #390 Noam Sayin'
Hey Noam, thank you for reposting that. If you're gonna be around LGF tomorrow, you might want to re-post it again, it's worth doing my friend.

428 The Other Les  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:12:48pm

Quote of the Day:

From Schlock Mercenary, July 4, 2008:

Sergeant, go ahead and goober [nonlethally disable] the bodyguards. A political incident sounds like fun.

-- Captain Kaff Tagon.

429 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:14:23pm

re: #427 realwest

Well, maybe if you prompted me. You know how shy I am...

;)

430 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:14:41pm

re: #411 Cognito

It can't.

After the barbarian invasions of Europe, the different groups (barbarians and Romans) lived under different laws. To say it didn't work out well is understatement.

There can be only one law in a country. If you allow others, except as a matter of private arbitration, you invite a host of terrible consequences, and before you know it, different penalties for different groups.

If you really think weregild - payment of "compensation" for a killing - is a good way to deal with violence, you're mad. There is no way that the West can accommodate sharia without destroying itself. To permit private law and private justice is to commit injustice.

431 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:15:20pm

re: #421 Sharmuta

I think your constant "devil's advocate" strategy is less beneficial than you think, not only to the issue at hand on whatever given thread you decide to take this approach, but it also actually makes it more difficult for various other Lizards to take you seriously when you are engaged honestly on another topic on another thread.

Just some food for thought for you.

Nom
nom
nom

432 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:15:21pm

re: #399 realwest

they ought not to have "special" laws that govern their conduct towards each other, especially if they are British citizens.

It's been pointed out more than a few times above that the Judge was only talking about contract law. As you well know, parties with equal bargaining strength, negotiating an arms length contract, can stipulate to the governing law, English, Sharia, or Martian. That's, apparently, the limited point he was making.

/of course, with Sharia, between the sexes, the comparable bargaining power breaks down instantly, before it's even contemplated, let alone invoked

433 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:15:38pm

Polygamy on the taxpayer's pound is another issue:

"Roughly, what is apparently being permitted is that, unlike women of any religion, and unlike non-muslim men, british muslim men are now officially allowed to import brides four at a time to process them through british immigration procedures.

Each wife will be equally entitled to british citizenship and to entitlements for council housing and benefits for themselves and their children. After divorce, another batch of four brides will have equal entitlements

This might seem like an attractive and fair system, and fully compliant with Sharia law. But is it attractive or fair to existing british muslim women?

Under protection of the same law as other british citizens, they have an equal relationship with their husbands. Under the 'sharia-friendly' legal exemption, polygamy is no offence, and all hope of equality is gone"
From the bbc message boards:


[Link: www.bbc.co.uk...]

434 RedPepper  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:16:09pm

re: #426 Cartman

Oh, I'm just havin' fun with it. I'm sure they'll post something, not out of patriotic pride, but moreso just to avoid the criticism.

Apparently, you have a better opinion of the people who run Google than I do ...

/but that's OK, it's a free country !

435 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:16:15pm

re: #403 Sharmuta Not to mention putting the burden of proof on her to prove that she was coerced and to retain a solicitor to represent her in court while she, theoretically remains living as the man's property unless and until she can get a British judge to agree with her and annul the (marriage) contract or any other sharia based contract.

436 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:17:48pm

re: #403 Sharmuta

But doesn't that require the female to later claim she was coerced? And doesn't that leave her in the same boat as rejecting the contract in the first place and risk "honor" killing?

So then should we change the way we make legal decisions, based upon already-creeping Sharia?

Replace "Sharia" with "gangland". A girl (ignoring the issue of the age of majority) may well be coerced into various behaviour by a gang, and may very well refuse to testify. This is a problem unconnected with Sharia, in this context. Do we refuse to allow all citizens the right to enter into contracts of their choosing because certain screwed-up segments of society are not handling liberty very well?

437 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:18:23pm

re: #403 Sharmuta

But doesn't that require the female to later claim she was coerced? And doesn't that leave her in the same boat as rejecting the contract in the first place and risk "honor" killing?

What are you gonna do? It's their ingrained culture, dating back centuries.

/seriously, how do you reverse it?

438 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:18:50pm

Have a happy fourth everyone, I'm headed to bed and I'll be on the road tomorrow.

439 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:19:24pm

re: #422 Cognito

Well, it might help if you stopped burbling nonsense such as you find the womens' resentment "wonderful". (Why, exactly? And, as I pointed out, their resentment isn't going to help them much if they find themselves living under Shari'a again, and the British courts refuse to help them?)

Maybe it would be a good idea if you just stopped saying silly things altogether---not just to me, to everybody.

440 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:19:44pm

re: #438 Thanos

Happy 4th. Safe travels.

441 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:19:50pm

re: #420 jorline

It's worse than that. It's women as property.

At least in the West, even under medieval marriage law, a woman was a person, though she was a means of transmitting property. Women as chattel has been the rule pretty much world-wide; the current Western concept of a woman as an equal person before the law, with the same rights as a man, is incredibly rare and hard-won.

Sharia is illegitimate on that ground alone, particularly in marriage, child custody, property and divorce cases. The fact that any Western judge is foolish enough to think that those are the precise cases where sharia should be allowed a voice is simply...flabbergasting.

442 6pat6  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:19:52pm

re: #76 xenon23

A

llah can't see them? Are they that stupid or do they really just mean that their Sharia Law police can't see them!

Seriously, they say that "allah does not see them" in these other places, so it is OK,in their minds, to party like it's 679.

443 NJDhockeyfan  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:19:55pm

Hello...what did I miss?

444 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:20:50pm

Head in the sand: Lord Bassam of Brighton:
"We will do everything we can to protect those in danger of being victims of so-called 'honour crimes' and to investigate and prosecute the perpetrators."
"It should be noted that domestic violence and honour-based violence are in no way condoned under Sharia law."
[Link: www.dailymail.co.uk...]

What a relief; nothing to worry about then./

445 Thanos  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:21:03pm

Oops one last thing:

A little sharia here, a bit of fatwa there, next thing you know you have Lal Masjid on your hands.

446 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:21:16pm

re: #435 realwest

And, of course, the judge might be extremely reluctant to dissolve her marriage, no matter what the evidence, because English courts are now supposed to accept Shari'a, don't you know, and how can he go against it? (A point the woman's husband---and her male relatives---will certainly be sure to point out to him.)

447 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:21:54pm

re: #438 Thanos

Drive safe. I don't even like to get out on the roads on holidays like these. Start early and keep your head on a swivel.

448 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:22:19pm
There can be only one law in a country.


From the Dept. of Devilish Advocacy:

I ran down the laws I mentioned before.

Outside -- or really, overlapping -- British law are several laws rooted in religious differences.

In Britain, for instance, the Church of England can refuse to marry people who have been previously divorced.

Jews operate Beth Din courts that hold legal authority in matters of marriage and divorce.

Somali customary laws allow disputes to be settled in cultural courts, for lack of a better word, without further recourse to secular courts.

And so forth.

449 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:22:44pm

So does a female Muslim have equal rights under Sharia? Can the judge tinker with Sharia to make it acceptable? Can a child refuse to take part in an arranged marriage. Can a Muslim renounce their religion? If Sharia endorses honor killings but British laws don't which takes precedence? What about honor "beatings"? Do Catholics get their own court system too? What about Wiccans?

The whole idea of separate laws based on a person's religion is completely asinine. Talk about a can of worms. This is a can of snakes.

450 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:22:56pm

re: #432 Killian Bundy

It's madness to allow it. There is no way that this particular camel's nose isn't the precursor to disaster.

451 6pat6  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:23:11pm

re: #96 Sharmuta

When I learned of The Duchess' kindness to the troops of her nation, my respect for her multiplied a thousand fold.

She certainly has much more sense (and balls) than her consort Prince Chuck.

452 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:23:27pm

re: #429 Noam Sayin'
ROFL! Well actually my friend you are sometimes shy about things like that - quoting yourself no matter how good the material is!
Just remember Mark Twain's assessment; "It may be impolite to blow one's own horn, but if you don't, you may never hear the music played!"
And the music in that quote deserves to be played tomorrow, of all days. And during the day, too when we have as full an audience as we are apt to have!

453 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:23:49pm

re: #436 MajorPribluda

I think that's a poor analogy- do gangs have written contracts that a court would uphold? And isn't pleading coercion one of the various ways a gang member might get their sentence reduced?

454 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:24:31pm

re: #441 Dianna

It's worse than that. It's women as property.

At least in the West, even under medieval marriage law, a woman was a person, though she was a means of transmitting property. Women as chattel has been the rule pretty much world-wide; the current Western concept of a woman as an equal person before the law, with the same rights as a man, is incredibly rare and hard-won.

Sharia is illegitimate on that ground alone, particularly in marriage, child custody, property and divorce cases. The fact that any Western judge is foolish enough to think that those are the precise cases where sharia should be allowed a voice is simply...flabbergasting.

Now imagine that we get some case law established, which states explicitly that only the provisions of Sharia which do not conflict with existing law are enforceable.
I say it's obvious. You say it's obvious. but until it is made explicit BY NAME, it will continue to be fought as if it were not obvious. And if we do not get on board a good solid case somewhere, we will find ourselves losing in court. Again.
We need to choose our own legal battlefields--this is a good one.

455 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:24:40pm

re: #437 Killian Bundy

Punish the behavior every single time, and ignore the cries for "tolerance."

456 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:24:43pm

Sharia courts have already spread across Britain and are being used as an alternative and informal legal system by many British Muslims.
Unofficial Sharia courts, such as those run by the Islamic Sharia Council, hear cases across the country from Leyton in East London to Dewsbury in Yorkshire.(snip)
...

What are the impacts on women?
Although divorce in Islamic law is often seen as unfair to the wife, there is a period of three months from a divorce being filed during which a husband must repeat his desire to be divorced three times for it to be enacted. The husband must maintain the wife financially during this. A man is allowed up to four wives, but he must prove he can take care of them all equally. Strict interpretation of Sharia, which says a rape claim can be made only if the act is witnessed by four Muslim men, can lead to women victims staying silent for fear of being accused of sex outside of marriage, or “zina”, which in Pakistan carries the death penalty.


[Link: www.timesonline.co.uk...]

457 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:25:31pm

re: #451 6pat6

She certainly has much more sense (and balls) than her consort Prince Chuck.

Agreed. Chuck is a turd. He should do the right thing and abscond the throne to William. He can never be a real King. Thats a joke.

458 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:26:04pm

re: #446 TalkinKamel

And, of course, the judge might be extremely reluctant to dissolve her marriage, no matter what the evidence, because English courts are now supposed to accept Shari'a, don't you know, and how can he go against it? (A point the woman's husband---and her male relatives---will certainly be sure to point out to him.)

/in the absence of a properly executed written contract, English law would apply by default in dissolution

459 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:26:12pm

re: #441 Dianna

Yes, I know. Either one of two things will have to happen.

1. British courts will have to break down and admit that they made a promise they couldn't keep---no, Shari'a law cannot be honored in British courts, it just contradicts British law on too many points. So why even attempt such a merger in the first place?

Or,

2. British courts will start to turn a blind eye towards things such as honor killings, polygamy, child marriage, etc.; technically, yes, these things are against British law, but they won't want to face the trouble, hassle and endless Islamic seething actually upholding British law would entail here---so they'll try to sweep it all under the rug, oh well, it's a Shari'a matter, doesn't come under our jurisdiction, blah, blah, blah.

460 NJDhockeyfan  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:26:20pm

Was this jackass judge elected?

461 Racer X  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:27:21pm

Good evening Lizards!

462 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:27:57pm
463 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:28:09pm

re: #448 Cognito

Jews and Christians have marriage laws that are far more compatible with British laws than Islamic ones are. (i.e., no polygamy, no child marriages, wife beating condemned, etc.)

(And we all know how swell Somali courts are, and what a great justice system they have! Yeah. Right.)

464 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:28:10pm

So if a British Muslim kid gets convicted of burglary, does the British Judge sentence him to having his right hand chopped off?

465 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:28:31pm

re: #448 Cognito

No religious (cannon) law over-rides civil law. The British dealt with that more than a century ago - around 1810, I believe, though I'd have to look it up - with the institution of civil marriage.

Once a marriage license is issued, you may marry however you please in any Western country, and it doesn't matter what any church's cannon law says on the matter.

They don't overlap. They're separate.

466 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:28:56pm

Goodnight all; Happy Independence Day!

467 Wilderstad  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:29:00pm

If you as a follower of Mohammed want to live in an Islamically governed paradise there are several countries you can go to that have instituted Shari'a law and several other medieval goodies.
Yes, most are pits, and poverty abounds but if you're truly religious, pious and feel you must live by that ancient and retrograde code, then stay there or move to one that already has all those Islamic trappings you're looking for.
We all have to be equal under the law ( and not religious supremacist law) to make our society work. Anything less will Balkanize a country and lead to civil war.

468 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:29:29pm

re: #465 Dianna

No religious (cannon) law over-rides civil law. The British dealt with that more than a century ago - around 1810, I believe, though I'd have to look it up - with the institution of civil marriage.

Once a marriage license is issued, you may marry however you please in any Western country, and it doesn't matter what any church's cannon law says on the matter.

They don't overlap. They're separate.

I believe you're wrong; the courts I mentioned have legal authority in England.

469 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:29:39pm

re: #463 TalkinKamel

He's in "devil's advocate" mode. I highly suggest he be placed on GAZE for the remainder of the evening.

470 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:30:17pm

And, as other posters have pointed out, many Islamic women just won't have the money, resources or freedom of movement to effectively present their cases in court. Theoretically, of course, British law would protect them---but would that always be the case in reality?

The law's always great in theory. It's when you actually try to carry it out that it becomes a bitch.

471 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:30:17pm

re: #469 Sharmuta

He's in "devil's advocate" mode. I highly suggest he be placed on GAZE for the remainder of the evening.

All I'm doing is asking questions, Sharmuta. Feel free to ignore. Or better yet, I'd like very much to hear your answers.

472 Promethea  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:30:53pm

re: #198 Killgore Trout

Agreed the only reason they are a problem is because of oil money. Within 50 years or so (hopefully sooner) that money is going to dry up. After that they will be an unfixable welfare burden like sub-Saharan Africa but they won't be a threat to Western society.

It would be very easy to destroy Saudi Arabia, if we needed to do so. I hope they know that.

473 6pat6  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:30:55pm

re: #142 jcm

Thank you for reminding Americans here (and our foreign friends, too!) WHY July 4th, 1776, means what it does. People need that.

474 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:30:59pm

re: #455 Dianna

Punish the behavior every single time, and ignore the cries for "tolerance."

/what constitutes punishment, aside from our costly and painful and righteous military effort?

475 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:31:34pm

re: #469 Sharmuta

Sounds good to me!

GAZE!

(And he never did answer my question about whether or not he supports Shari'a law for women. Oh well. . . )

476 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:31:41pm

re: #456 jaunte

But they are - so far - unofficial. Which means that their decisions are not binding and cannot be enforced; what's more, such courts are actually illegitimate and illegal.

Prosecute them!

477 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:31:56pm

re: #475 TalkinKamel

Sounds good to me!

GAZE!

(And he never did answer my question about whether or not he supports Shari'a law for women. Oh well. . . )

Yes, actually, I did.

478 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:32:17pm

re: #432 Killian Bundy
Ah yes, but your second paragraph makes your first paragraph, well, inoperative. You can't sign a contract in most American States unless you are 18 (or whatever the particular state law says is the age of majority). Under Sharia law, I doubt that there's any such thing as an age of consent for women. Not so sure about men, either. So if a 9 year old girl contractually agrees to marry a 38 year old man under Sharia law that would be a valid contract. So under this manifest legal scholar of a "Senior Judge " it would appear that, the parties having agreed to be married under Sharia law, she is legally married to him. And if it doesn't mean that, Killian my friend, what the hell does it mean? What aspects of Sharia law, especially as applied to women, do not violate English Common law (or since I'm not an expert on current English Common Law, say under North Carolina or Federal Common law)?

479 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:32:22pm

re: #471 Cognito

My thoughts on this matter are posted throughout this thread- feel free to, you know, read them.

480 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:32:50pm

re: #448 Cognito

The whole idea of the "Church of England" is idiotic. I take Jefferson's side on that concept.

481 oronpam  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:32:50pm

Two letters F U

482 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:33:03pm

re: #450 Dianna

It's madness to allow it. There is no way that this particular camel's nose isn't the precursor to disaster.

I'm looking at this as a legal maneuver. Right now, the law which is very clear is being ignored by the people and judges alike. If we are not very careful, new laws will be written, which will IN FACT AND IN LAW allow precisely what we do not want.

I think that it is to our advantage now to get some decision on the record which strengthen the law we have now.

Deflate support for Sharia by agreeing to the eminently reasonable proposition that every Briton (or American) may enter into contracts. The hook to this is that the contract must not violate existing law.

This is a fine way to help halt the spread of Sharia.

483 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:33:35pm

re: #467 Wilderstad

If you as a follower of Mohammed want to live in an Islamically governed paradise there are several countries you can go to that have instituted Shari'a law and several other medieval goodies.
Yes, most are pits, and poverty abounds but if you're truly religious, pious and feel you must live by that ancient and retrograde code, then stay there or move to one that already has all those Islamic trappings you're looking for.
We all have to be equal under the law ( and not religious supremacist law) to make our society work. Anything less will Balkanize a country and lead to civil war.

Well stated.

Stay home and live as you want, don't come into my house and tell me how to live

484 swamprat  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:34:23pm

Well actually, this could work out. They could have different laws for different people. They could divide them by, say, class....Yeah! Different laws for different classes! The upper class would get one set of laws, and the "lower" classes an entirely different sort. This kind of thing works. It worked in India, Australia, Germany, America(Anybody remember who was considered 5/8ths human? Or was it 3/5ths?) England, Ireland, Scotland(The last two were under "Britain", uh, England) Northern Africa, and South Africa, and, uh, middle Africa, And of course China had some interesting castes and laws, And the rest of Europe. How did I leave out South America.
England used to be quite good at this sort of thing, If I were muslim, this would make me very nervous.

485 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:34:24pm

re: #459 TalkinKamel

Then every little group can institute their own "community laws", and I'd be right in the forefront of doing so.

Then everyone can fight it out in the ugliest way possible.

It destroys everything that makes a decent world, and we're back to the war of each against all.

486 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:34:57pm

re: #438 Thanos Have a goodnight Thanos and have a happy Independence Day yourself!

487 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:35:00pm

re: #471 Cognito

I'm gonna give Cogs the gaze in a minute, but I just can't resist. . .

Cognito, you haven't answered any of my questions.

(As for asking questions---well, babies can ask questions: "Why isn't the sky pink?" "Is it wrong to eat crayons?" "Why can't I put the cat in the washing machine?" Just being able to ask questions doesnt' mean anything---it might just mean you're too dumb to listen to the answers. If you're really curious about Shari'a law, I suggest you read the Koran, and/or study how it's "brightened" the lives of those hapless souls living in places like Iran, or Saudi Arabia.)

488 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:35:06pm

re: #480 Mich-again

The whole idea of the "Church of England" is idiotic. I take Jefferson's side on that concept.

I agree, although some of my favorite figures were members of the Church. Regardless, there it is: continuing on regardless of our feelings on it.

489 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:35:07pm

re: #474 Killian Bundy

Don't get me started. I'm tired, angry, and this hits me where I live.

490 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:35:19pm

re: #477 Cognito

Actually, you didn't.

491 6pat6  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:35:35pm

re: #487 TalkinKamel

Amen to that!

492 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:35:45pm

re: #470 TalkinKamel

many Islamic women just won't have the money, resources or freedom of movement to effectively present their cases in court

And most don't want to.

/whatever you might think about it, brainwashed as they may be by your standards, in their own world, that's the life they know and that's the life they want

493 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:36:03pm

re: #485 Dianna

Exactly.

(Well said!)

494 jaunte  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:36:13pm

re: #476 Dianna

Ok, I didn't quite go away yet.
Any potential prosecution of sharia courts is becoming a problem of mob rule:
Poll reveals 40% of Muslims want sharia law in UK: Four out of 10 British Muslims want sharia law introduced into parts of the country, a survey reveals today.

The ICM opinion poll also indicates that a fifth have sympathy with the "feelings and motives" of the suicide bombers who attacked London last July 7, killing 52 people, although 99 per cent thought the bombers were wrong to carry out the atrocity.


[Link: www.telegraph.co.uk...]

495 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:36:38pm

re: #487 TalkinKamel

I'm gonna give Cogs the gaze in a minute, but I just can't resist. . .

Cognito, you haven't answered any of my questions.

(As for asking questions---well, babies can ask questions: "Why isn't the sky pink?" "Is it wrong to eat crayons?" "Why can't I put the cat in the washing machine?" Just being able to ask questions doesnt' mean anything---it might just mean you're too dumb to listen to the answers. If you're really curious about Shari'a law, I suggest you read the Koran, and/or study how it's "brightened" the lives of those hapless souls living in places like Iran, or Saudi Arabia.)

No one likes to repeat himself. But here it is:

"I don't approve of anyone being subjugated under anything.

You have a way of asking questions that are so obvious as to be ridiculous. 'Do you enjoy kicking old ladies in the shins? Eh? Eh?'"

496 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:37:19pm

re: #492 Killian Bundy

It might be the life they think they want, but I see no reason why British courts should support their menfolk in keeping them oppressed and brainwashed. Western law wasn't made for that.

497 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:37:26pm

Dianna- I agree with you. Women have fought hard for the rights we now enjoy. Sadly, my guess is the feminist groups will do virtually nothing on this issue. Instead they will add their names to the list of the derelict.

498 Bubblehead II  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:37:51pm

screw it, too f.u to retype. You all have a good night.

Listen to this if you are interested. otherwise I will see you in the morninhg.

l*r

499 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:38:01pm

re: #468 Cognito

Absolutely incorrect.

500 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:38:18pm

re: #495 Cognito

And you have a way of burbling nonsense.

(Please, don't eat those crayons.)

501 Promethea  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:38:30pm

re: #225 Josephine

I've heard Muslims on CBC Radio call-in shows claim, in all seriousness, that Muslims in Canada today are being treated the same as Jews in Nazi Germany.

Are they delusional or bald-faced liars?

I can never understand why the hosts don't just laugh them off the air.

/Tip-toe round the Muslims... (Paging Tiny Tim.)

Let's never ever forget the amazing power of RIDICULE. Why don't we use it more often? What could be more ridiculous than a religion devoted to bowing and scraping before Allah, the most idiotic god ever conceived by the mind of a lunatic?

502 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:39:25pm

re: #496 TalkinKamel

It might be the life they think they want, but I see no reason why British courts should support their menfolk in keeping them oppressed and brainwashed. Western law wasn't made for that.

And doesn't it make us their oppressors by proxy?

503 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:39:27pm

re: #491 6pat6

{6pat6!}

504 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:39:30pm

re: #478 realwest

Under Sharia law, I doubt that there's any such thing as an age of consent for women. Not so sure about men, either. So if a 9 year old girl contractually agrees to marry a 38 year old man under Sharia law that would be a valid contract.

Well said RW

Age didn't detour Mohammad and I'm sure that the 9 year old didn't consent to him either.

505 Killgore Trout  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:39:46pm

re: #495 Cognito

'Do you enjoy kicking old ladies in the shins? Eh? Eh?'"


Yes. Next question.

506 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:39:54pm

re: #502 Sharmuta

Well, yes----which is another reason why this is not a good idea.

507 RememberSekhmet?  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:40:05pm

Evening, y'all

I have yet another toad hanging out in my garden! Aren't they supposed to be good luck?

508 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:40:12pm

Happy Independence Day!

Never forget...

509 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:40:34pm

re: #505 Killgore Trout

Some old ladies deserve it.

510 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:40:38pm

re: #482 MajorPribluda

The law of unintended consequences applies. A flat "no" is a much better idea.

511 Yankee Division Son  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:41:01pm

Well, it's past midnight on the east coast. Happy Birthday America! My favorite factoid of the 4th of July..

On this day in History, (there I go again) July 4th, 1826, 50 years to the day since the signing of the declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams both died.


Narrator: The 50th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence dawned warm and dry up and down the Eastern seaboard. What happened that day seemed more like poetry than history.

David McCullough, Historian: It was far beyond anything anyone could conceive of. And people at that time, very understandably, took it to mean that the hand of God was truly involved with the destinies of the United States of America.

Narrator: At Monticello that morning, Thomas Jefferson, age eighty-three, willed himself to stay alive.

Joseph Ellis, Historian: He's murmuring things that nobody can understand, and then his slave, Burwell, understands that he means: shift my pillow. And then he mutters, "Is it the fourth?"-- meaning: Is it the fourth of July? Jefferson wants to die on schedule.

Narrator: Thomas Jefferson died at about one in the afternoon while, in the valley below, church bells rang in celebration of Independence Day. At Quincy, the roar of cannon had begun early that morning.

Joseph Ellis, Historian: Adams has gotten up fit as a fiddle, no long, lingering illnesses. But he starts to fail just about the time that Jefferson dies.

Narrator: In the afternoon, a brief thunderstorm rolled in across the neighboring marshes. Adams was having difficulty breathing. But even at 91, his mind was clear. "It is a great day," he said. "It is a good day."

Joseph Ellis, Historian: They take him downstairs, and he dies about 4:30 in the afternoon. And his last words are, "Thomas Jefferson still lives," which in fact was not correct. But it's poignant. His last thoughts were of Jefferson. He was a good friend.

David McCullough, Historian: When he was lying there dying, thinking of Jefferson, the cannon and rifle fire and firecrackers were all booming in the distance, celebrating the Declaration of Independence. Now, if you -- If you did that in a movie, somebody would say, "Oh, that's too much. You know. Things like that don't happen in real life." It did happen in real life, again and again, through that whole amazing life.

512 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:41:11pm

re: #507 RememberSekhmet?

Only if it's a lickable toad.

Is it a lickable toad?

513 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:41:17pm

re: #466 jaunte
Good night my friend and the same to you!

514 Carridine  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:42:28pm

#455 Diana...
For British and churches, it is 'canon' law...

For Muslims and extortion, it is 'cannon' law...

515 gman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:42:31pm

Saying Beth Din courts already exist in Britain doesn't justify the use of Sharia Law. It's merely a favorite moral equivalence trick that moonbats use.

516 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:42:42pm

re: #436 MajorPribluda

Replace "Sharia" with "gangland".

Your conflation of these two worthy organizations works for me. Would you be supportive of the Chief Justice making a public speech supporting the mob's right to run their own legally recognized courts to resolve disputes over drug deals?
I don't think so.

517 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:42:46pm

re: #497 Sharmuta

Because they've been taught that every culture is equally valid, and they refuse to think through the consequences.

There is no way that a deed under sharia would read as mine does for my house: "As her sole property, to Dianna ....., a single woman."

You have no idea how I treasure that, even the archaic language and description.

518 Irene NYC  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:42:50pm

Oh, cut it out cognito.

There is no other "law" in England -

other than Sharia

- that is attempting to take over the country (and the world) through the use of violence, legal and extra-legal means. A few little eccentric religious throw-backs are not the same as what the muslims and their apologists are trying to do

Getting stupid in your old age, eh?

519 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:43:31pm

re: #421 Sharmuta

I think your constant "devil's advocate" strategy is less beneficial than you think, not only to the issue at hand on whatever given thread you decide to take this approach, but it also actually makes it more difficult for various other Lizards to take you seriously when you are engaged honestly on another topic on another thread.

Just some food for thought for you.

Wasting your time. Cognito has shown itself to be very troll like it it's behavior.

520 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:43:59pm

re: #468 Cognito
"I believe you're wrong; the courts I mentioned have legal authority in England." So you're saying that if the Church of England says you're married you are married and don't need any sort of civil license? Here in the US, any church can marry you, but you must first have a license to be married issued by the state in which you are getting married.
Do you have any links or references to your point?

521 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:44:55pm

re: #492 Killian Bundy

No, they're unable to get out of it.

522 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:45:05pm

re: #512 Noam Sayin'

Only if it's a lickable toad.

Is it a lickable toad?

All toads are lickable. Some just have a bigger payoff for doing so. ;)

523 Carridine  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:45:31pm

Gotta go!

BBIAW, as K

/from high atop the Securities Building, downtown in cool, cloudy Bangkok!

524 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:45:43pm

re: #496 TalkinKamel

It might be the life they think they want, but I see no reason why British courts should support their menfolk in keeping them oppressed and brainwashed. Western law wasn't made for that.

Okay, I agree.

/what's the realistic, hands on, solution, where do you start?

525 Carridine  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:46:54pm

re: #522 Hard Right

Beg to differ: SOME toads (South and Central American species) are VENOMOUS and poisonous. Licking precedes death.

526 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:46:59pm

re: #494 jaunte

I'm out of sympathy; they're still a minority. Every single one who answers that way is barred from any public assistance.

Let's see how well islamic charity holds up.

527 Irene NYC  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:47:12pm

re: #492 Killian Bundy

And most don't want to.

/whatever you might think about it, brainwashed as they may be by your standards, in their own world, that's the life they know and that's the life they want

Well, people who have been abused all their life may think that they want the abuse to continue, because that's all they know. So what if they "want" it. That doesn't make it right or something that should be tolerated in the modern world.

528 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:47:35pm

re: #514 Carridine

I think that's backwards?

Oh, hell. I'm tired. Sorry!

529 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:47:36pm

re: #492 Killian Bundy
Killian - my friend (and I hope you still are my friend) you simply CAN'T KNOW that Muslim women or girls " in their own world, that's the life they know and that's the life they want" you can only observe that that is the life they live.

530 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:48:24pm

re: #525 Carridine

Beg to differ: SOME toads (South and Central American species) are VENOMOUS and poisonous. Licking precedes death.

You can still lick them. It's simply a bad idea though.
How'd you like your next of kin to know you died from licking a toad?

531 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:49:12pm

re: #499 Dianna

Absolutely incorrect.

No, I don't believe so. In England Jews are able to turn to the Beth Din to resolve matters of family and marriage. It's not compulsory -- no one is made to enter the court's authority -- but if all parties agree, the court does indeed have authority.

Same for the other examples, from other cultures and religions, that I mentioned.

532 Racer X  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:49:27pm

Who's bogin' the toad?

533 swamprat  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:49:29pm

Well now, who needs that nasty old Magna Carta, anyway?

534 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:49:53pm

re: #448 Cognito

Are you saying that Sharia is an option in the mediation phase of a civil trial? I say that is very problematic given women's subjugation under Islam. Even her own relatives would try to coerce her forcefully if needed to submit. They would probably value Islamic law over their own daughter's best interests. Thats why I am against this whole idea.

535 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:50:00pm

re: #517 Dianna

It doesn't help that we have leftist, agenda driven feminists who have betrayed the real intent of feminism- a woman's right to self-determination. If we were true to this ideal, we would be in a much better position to effectively lobby against shari'a and serve as role models for the muslimas. What they see of feminism now just feeds their anti-Western biases, and what the feminists do is perpetuate the oppression of the very women they should be trying to help.

536 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:50:12pm

re: #521 Dianna

No, they're unable to get out of it.

You're assuming they know better or even care about Western values.

/as a rule, they don't, they've been conditioned and taught Islam from birth and the vast majority of Muslim women embrace it, you're going to need a better plan

537 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:50:31pm

look at the countries in which sharia law is the law of the land.
this is where you will find women completely helpless and at the mercy of men. they are shrouded and erased as human beings, they can't vote, in many places they can't work, drive a car or easily divorce their abusive husbands who control their lives.
why bring any semblance of that to a modern country where women are afforded rights and treated as human beings.
to allow sharia law to creep in and undermine the rule of law of any democracy will weaken society and culture.
sharia is being pushed to spread all the other facets of islam. that is why moslems are agitating for it.

538 desertbrat  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:50:34pm

-he mentioned stoning, flogging or amputating hands is "out of the
question...."

/cutting off heads(a practice of Britain's past) is ok.

British muslim woman quaking in their burkas.

539 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:51:02pm

re: #520 realwest

That's absolutely wrong. Evidently, Cognito's unaware of the Registry Office.

540 Racer X  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:51:08pm

Cog,

You hatched exactly one minute before I did.

541 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:51:13pm

re: #532 Racer X

Who's bogin' the toad?

Ooops. Sorry, but it's me. Can't keep the damned thing lit. ;)

542 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:51:21pm

re: #527 Irene NYC

Well, people who have been abused all their life may think that they want the abuse to continue, because that's all they know. So what if they "want" it. That doesn't make it right or something that should be tolerated in the modern world.

I totally agree.

/what's the practical overarching solution?

543 Carridine  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:51:44pm

re: #530 Hard Right

You can still lick them. It's simply a bad idea though.
How'd you like your next of kin to know you died from licking a toad?

LMAO!

"Uh, we regret to inform you that he... uh... well, you see... the, uhm..."

/new screen time! :D

544 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:51:55pm
545 Racer X  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:52:30pm

re: #541 Hard Right

Ooops. Sorry, but it's me. Can't keep the damned thing lit. ;)

No prob. Just don't forget which end to puff.

546 nyc redneck  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:52:31pm

re: #507 RememberSekhmet?

Evening, y'all

I have yet another toad hanging out in my garden! Aren't they supposed to be good luck?

they are such good luck. and they will really help to keep your garden bug free. i rejoice when i see toads hopping around in the garden.

547 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:52:45pm

re: #524 Killian Bundy

Do you mean "solution" or do you mean "sane, humane solution"?

I'd start with much stricter standards for public assistance and housing, and go on from there.

548 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:52:46pm

re: #543 Carridine

LMAO!

"Uh, we regret to inform you that he... uh... well, you see... the, uhm..."

/new screen time! :D

You never know when there's a toad out there with your name on it.

549 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:53:15pm

re: #534 Mich-again

Are you saying that Sharia is an option in the mediation phase of a civil trial? I say that is very problematic given women's subjugation under Islam. Even her own relatives would try to coerce her forcefully if needed to submit. They would probably value Islamic law over their own daughter's best interests. Thats why I am against this whole idea.

Agree...her own family would even kill her if they felt they were bound by honor to do so.

550 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:53:23pm

re: #545 Racer X

No prob. Just don't forget which end to puff.

Now you tell me. (ptui, ptu!)

551 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:54:22pm

So what does the British judge say about first cousins marrying and having kids?

552 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:54:33pm

re: #539 Dianna Yeah, I know that Dianna, that's why I asked him for links to buttress or even moderately support his statements. But it is Cognito who is wrong here, not me!
You are tired if you think I believe what he said! LOL!

553 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:55:44pm

re: #544 Cartman
No, my friend, thank you for that post.

554 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:56:06pm

Every 152,322 minutes, another person dies from licking a toad.

Where's the outrage?

555 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:56:32pm

re: #534 Mich-again

Are you saying that Sharia is an option in the mediation phase of a civil trial? I say that is very problematic given women's subjugation under Islam. Even her own relatives would try to coerce her forcefully if needed to submit. They would probably value Islamic law over their own daughter's best interests. Thats why I am against this whole idea.

I'm against the whole idea too. I'm just trying to sort out why. And I'm trying to reconcile my instinctive reaction against Sharia with knowledge of other legal systems overlapping the British one.

Just being honest: There's a double standard at work. And maybe that's a good thing. But to call it something else is dishonest.

- D.A.

556 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:56:35pm

re: #554 Cartman

Every 152,322 minutes, another person dies from licking a toad.

Where's the outrage?

Ban toads! Especially assault toads!

557 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:56:44pm

re: #531 Cognito

Cognito, you're wrong. You're thinking of anecdotes regarding odd contracts that have appeared in civil family law courts and were upheld. It's not at all the same thing!

No modern Western state allows any religious marriage custom to dictate civil marriage law. None.

While certain kinds of contracts and settlements about marriage and divorce may be submitted in civil courts, they must conform to civil marriage law.

558 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:56:47pm

re: #551 Mich-again

So what does the British judge say about first cousins marrying and having kids?

Shari'a allows this, so he theoretically must be okay with it.

559 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:57:36pm

re: #540 Racer X

Cog,

You hatched exactly one minute before I did.

The younger twin often makes off with the smarter brain and kinder heart.

But I'm older.

560 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:57:47pm

re: #549 jorline

Agree...her own family would even kill her if they felt they were bound by honor to do so.

Thats why Sharia doesn't fit in as an reasonable authority in mediation. The system is completely based on subjugation of women. No woman involved in a Sharia settlement stands on equal footing with a man. Trying to fit this into a modern legal framework is like dressing a pig in a tuxedo.

The judge is guilty of projectionism. He's projecting his own moral character onto an evil death cult.

561 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:57:49pm

re: #538 desertbrat

Are you Sage's kid?

562 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:57:56pm

re: #556 Hard Right

Ban toads! Especially assault toads!

They are the biggest offenders. ;)

563 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:58:27pm

re: #536 Killian Bundy

I think you're offbase on this, or you wouldn't be seeing so many muslim women running like hell here in the West.

564 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:58:30pm

re: #529 realwest

Killian - my friend (and I hope you still are my friend) you simply CAN'T KNOW that Muslim women or girls " in their own world, that's the life they know and that's the life they want" you can only observe that that is the life they live.

/guess again, etc.

565 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:58:53pm

re: #562 Cartman

They are the biggest offenders. ;)

Well, one has yet to come right at me. Maybe we can "thin the herd"?

566 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:59:01pm

re: #557 Dianna Um, why do you think Cognito is "thinking of...." he is merely postulating as fact that which would support his arguments AS DEVIL'S ADVOCATES are wont to do.

567 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:59:34pm

re: #557 Dianna

While certain kinds of contracts and settlements about marriage and divorce may be submitted in civil courts, they must conform to civil marriage law.

Yes, of course. And so say the people pushing for a co-existent sharia in England.

568 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 9:59:39pm

re: #510 Dianna

The law of unintended consequences applies. A flat "no" is a much better idea.

Good luck making that stick. That NO position is the one with the far worse consequences. Right now the victim lobby takes the position that Muslims are oppressed. If we make that statement true, by not allowing them the same rights to, say, enter contracts, then by Gum the law WILL change, and not in a good way. Then Sharia will become an ALTERNATIVE legal authority, rather than subjugated to existing law, *as is the case now*.

569 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:00:16pm

re: #547 Dianna

I'd start with much stricter standards for public assistance and housing, and go on from there.

/that's a good start, although Britain is damn near socialist society

570 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:00:21pm

re: #565 Hard Right

Well, one has yet to come right at me. Maybe we can "thin the herd"?

Think a varmint caliber will do? Or should we go predator, just to be safe?

571 Racer X  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:00:27pm

re: #559 Cognito

I always thought I got the looks.

572 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:00:32pm

re: #558 Sharmuta

Shari'a allows this, so he theoretically must be okay with it.

I wonder how many Muslim babies born with birth defects just "disappear".

573 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:00:49pm

re: #552 realwest

I've been up since 5 a.m., so, yes, I'm really tired.

574 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:00:49pm

re: #560 Mich-again

Thats why Sharia doesn't fit in as an reasonable authority in mediation. The system is completely based on subjugation of women. No woman involved in a Sharia settlement stands on equal footing with a man. Trying to fit this into a modern legal framework is like dressing a pig in a tuxedo.

The judge is guilty of projectionism. He's projecting his own moral character onto an evil death cult.

spot on Mich

It's like putting lipstick on a pig where I'm from...LOL

575 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:01:17pm

re: #561 Noam Sayin'
Geez, Noam! Don't ask him that directly! Ask him what he's drinkin' and work it up from there!
;')

576 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:01:18pm

Happy Independence Day.

577 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:01:33pm

re: #552 realwest

Yeah, I know that Dianna, that's why I asked him for links to buttress or even moderately support his statements. But it is Cognito who is wrong here, not me!
You are tired if you think I believe what he said! LOL!

No, I'm not wrong.

(Fer real.)

578 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:02:23pm

re: #570 Cartman

Think a varmint caliber will do? Or should we go predator, just to be safe?

AT4 should do it. Can never be too careful.

579 gop_patriot  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:03:03pm

re: #576 Occasional Reader

Happy Independence Day.

To you also. :) We're hearing lots of little firecrackers in our neighborhood, but the dogs are taking it well so far...

/Darn, it took me forever to catch up and read all the comments. *whew*

580 Occasional Reader  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:03:12pm

re: #556 Hard Right

Ban toads! Especially assault toads!

In DC, I'm required to keep my toad disassembled or secured with a toad lock. It's ridiculous.

581 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:03:27pm

re: #567 Cognito

Sharia's very basis cannot be made to conform to British law.

The answer to the very notion of "overlap" or "respect" for sharia is a firm, "No."

582 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:04:00pm

re: #581 Dianna

Sharia's very basis cannot be made to conform to British law.

The answer to the very notion of "overlap" or "respect" for sharia is a firm, "No."

I feel the same way. But I want to back up that feeling with a solid argument.

583 Sharmuta  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:04:08pm

re: #568 MajorPribluda

Good luck making that stick. That NO position is the one with the far worse consequences. Right now the victim lobby takes the position that Muslims are oppressed. If we make that statement true, by not allowing them the same rights to, say, enter contracts, then by Gum the law WILL change, and not in a good way. Then Sharia will become an ALTERNATIVE legal authority, rather than subjugated to existing law, *as is the case now*.

I see your point, but a lot of muslimas will get f*cked over until one is found brave enough to stand up for herself in order to establish the case law.

584 RedPepper  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:04:16pm

re: #576 Occasional Reader

Happy Independence Day.

And the same to you !

585 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:04:20pm

re: #566 realwest

I don't mind a devil's advocate. They are often helpful. Sometimes they turn out to have a good point, then again sometimes they turn into pinatas.

586 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:04:25pm

re: #564 Killian Bundy

/guess again, etc.

Was that Tokyo Rose or Baghdad Betty?

587 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:04:59pm

re: #580 Occasional Reader

In DC, I'm required to keep my toad disassembled or secured with a toad lock. It's ridiculous.

Ewww.
I thought gun locks were a pain. Toad locks, much, much worse.

588 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:06:23pm

When toads evolve to the point they are covered in butter cream frosting I might lick one. But not till then.

589 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:07:15pm

re: #568 MajorPribluda

You miss the point.

Seriously, there is no basis for respecting sharia law, because every single basis conflicts with the notion of equality of every individual before the law.

Muslims are free to enter contracts - under existing Western law. If they want to create a loan contract that doesn't have interest - but still mandates that a certain amount be paid above the principal - they sure as hell can.

There is no reason to even begin to allow the camel's breath to begin fluttering the unsecured edge of the tent. Just say no. The assumptions underlying sharia bear no resemblance to equal justice, and therefore, they are illegitimate.

590 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:07:34pm

re: #531 Cognito

No, I don't believe so. In England Jews are able to turn to the Beth Din to resolve matters of family and marriage. It's not compulsory -- no one is made to enter the court's authority -- but if all parties agree, the court does indeed have authority.

Same for the other examples, from other cultures and religions, that I mentioned.

And so all we are looking at is a special case of contract law. So how do we possibly disagree with the proposition that citizens may enter into legally binding contracts, so long as the terms of those contracts do not violate existing law?

Now whether or not a particular person is competent or coerced into something is in fact an important consideration, but one case at a time, and has absolutely no bearing on the simple proposition stated above.

I'm getting vertigo saying this, but I have just agreed (to some extent) with Cognito on two separate threads. And Cog, I don't think that you are playing Devil's advocate. Do you actually disagree with the arguments which you have made?

591 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:07:43pm
592 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:08:01pm

re: #575 realwest

If he's Sage's kid, he'll answer directly, and offer up some of his old man's Mezcal.

You know where the old man hid the keys to the Mezcal safe, don't you brat?

593 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:08:43pm

My favorite 4th of July quote. Either we hang together, or we hang separately. Not sure who said it though. Might have been Ben Franklin.

594 Cartman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:09:00pm

re: #578 Hard Right

AT4 should do it. Can never be too careful.

Ok, but you take the point. ;)

595 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:09:13pm

re: #353 Penny T. Wienerdog

When will the Brits take back their country?

I fear that it is too late. We have spent a lot of time in London over the years, and it is 7 years since what was our last trip.

From friends, I hear about the area where they live, and despair. Mosques, name it, in an area that is part of greater London, but is actually in Kent.

Melanie Phillips has it right: Londonistan is real, and is now a part of Eurabia.

May G-d help and save the UK from itself.

596 Noam Sayin'  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:09:17pm

re: #585 Mich-again

Or sometimes they're a general pain in the ass.

597 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:09:27pm

re: #577 Cognito

That article does not say that their decisions are binding in civil law that I saw.

598 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:09:42pm

re: #590 MajorPribluda

Do you actually disagree with the arguments which you have made?

There's nothing to agree or disagree with, yet. My opinion is unformed at the moment, although my instinct is to kick against anything sharia-related.

The trick is reconciling that with matters of equality and legality. Which is what I'm working my way toward at the moment.

599 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:10:36pm

re: #582 Cognito

I've given you one. The simple fact is that sharia does not regard every single person as equal. That's where the whole business has to reach a full stop.

600 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:10:46pm

re: #596 Noam Sayin'

Or sometimes they're a general pain in the ass.

Yeah that too.

601 RedPepper  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:10:56pm

re: #593 Mich-again

“You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don’t ever count on having both at once.” ~ Robert A. Heinlein

602 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:11:00pm

re: #594 Cartman

Ok, but you take the point. ;)

Hey, I did that when we hunted the Mexican staring frog of Sri Lanka. Took me days to recover. Besides, do you really want to be behind me when I fire that thing off?

603 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:11:13pm

re: #586 jorline

Was that Tokyo Rose or Baghdad Betty?

You'll have to listen to the whole 48 minutes for the answer.

/whatever else, for better or worse, these women aren't cowed idiots, kind of like The View, only strange

604 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:12:10pm

re: #583 Sharmuta

His point is not valid.

Muslims are not oppressed by Western law, they are simply absolutely equal, and have no special, private law that gives them an advantage.

They need to learn to deal with that.

605 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:12:19pm

re: #597 Dianna

That article does not say that their decisions are binding in civil law that I saw.

They are indeed legally binding, provided that 1) both parties are Jewish, and 2) that both parties agreed to the court's authority before proceeding. It extends beyond marriage, as well, to other civil matters. (None criminal.)

The same goes for the other examples I mentioned. I think the Somali system is fairly elaborate.

606 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:12:33pm

re: #557 Dianna

Cognito, you're wrong. You're thinking of anecdotes regarding odd contracts that have appeared in civil family law courts and were upheld. It's not at all the same thing!

No modern Western state allows any religious marriage custom to dictate civil marriage law. None.

While certain kinds of contracts and settlements about marriage and divorce may be submitted in civil courts, they must conform to civil marriage law.

And that is what this Judge has said:

In his speech at an East London mosque, Lord Phillips signalled approval of sharia principles as long as punishments - and divorce rulings - complied with the law of the land.
607 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:12:40pm

re: #564 Killian Bundy
If you think I've any inclination to listen 45+ minutes of Islamic Channel's report on how Islamic woman just LOVE living under Sharia law, you're wrong - unless, of course, I can find a 45 minute video tape of woman living in abusive relationships that are not Islamic saying how much the no-good-sonofabitch who beats her periodically but "still loves me and only abuses me to show his love for me" and you agree to watch that.
Seriously, Killian - for an educated man such as yourself, to honestly believe that Islamic women WANT to be treated as less than human beings, want to be "married off" to anyone her family decides, WANT to suffer beatings periodically - as provided for in the Koran - WANT to submit to the humiliation and pain of gang rape because she spoke to a single Islamic man, WANT FGM, is too incredible for me to believe. Muslim women have absolutely NO IDEA of how woman live in other parts of the world and if they hear apostate woman speaking of these things, their Imman will set them straight.
Please, it's late and I'm tired and you are way too intelligent and way too well educated to believe that crap.

608 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:12:53pm

re: #599 Dianna

I've given you one. The simple fact is that sharia does not regard every single person as equal. That's where the whole business has to reach a full stop.

And that is the place where it runs afoul of English law.

609 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:13:24pm

re: #603 Killian Bundy

You'll have to listen to the whole 48 minutes for the answer.

/whatever else, for better or worse, these women aren't cowed idiots, kind of like The View, only strange

LOL...and the View isn't strange?

610 RedPepper  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:14:25pm

re: #593 Mich-again

Yes indeed, it was Mr. Franklin who said it ...

611 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:14:44pm

re: #598 Cognito

Don't be silly!

Sharia doesn't treat each person as equal.

That's the first, last, best and only reason to reject it!

612 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:15:08pm

re: #611 Dianna

Don't be silly!

Sharia doesn't treat each person as equal.

That's the first, last, best and only reason to reject it!

Indeed.

613 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:15:12pm

re: #568 MajorPribluda

If we make that statement true, by not allowing them the same rights to, say, enter contracts, then by Gum the law WILL change, and not in a good way. Then Sharia will become an ALTERNATIVE legal authority, rather than subjugated to existing law, *as is the case now*.

Bullshit.
Sharia law is inherently incompatible with essential Western values. It therefore cannot be allowed.
If there was a Nazi community in England which wanted to have its own courts to adjudicate upon disputes between Nazis over what colour to use to spray-paint swastikas on synagogues, would you support that too?

614 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:15:18pm

re: #576 Occasional Reader Hey O.R. - Happy Independence Day to you too, my friend!

615 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:16:11pm

re: #605 Cognito

That's contract law, like consenting to binding arbitration.

Frankly, though, I'd dismantle that in a heartbeat.

616 RememberSekhmet?  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:16:58pm

re: #512 Noam Sayin'

Nope, I don't think the toad would let me lick him.

617 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:17:09pm

re: #606 MajorPribluda

Then he's senile, or just stupid.

I'm beginning to lose my temper. Sorry.

618 gman  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:17:21pm

The turn of events in Britain is deeply disturbing, but I think it's just another perfect example of why religion needs to be clearly separated from government. They are too many religions that want government overlap in order to secure quasi- or full legitimacy for their actions. I don't care about the history of religious courts in Britain. Their existence does not provide an excuse for their perpetuation and legitimacy.

619 sparrowlake  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:17:52pm

re: #581 Dianna

Sharia's very basis cannot be made to conform to British law.
The answer to the very notion of "overlap" or "respect" for sharia is a firm, "No."

Yes. That is the bottom line - Sharia is inherently inconsistent with basic western values.

620 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:18:10pm

re: #610 RedPepper

Yes indeed, it was Mr. Franklin who said it ...

Raise a glass for my last working brain cell ! Overworked and underpaid.

621 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:18:31pm

re: #568 MajorPribluda

I don't know; from the way you put it, it sounds like, either way, you end up with Shari'a.

And that's not a good thing.

622 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:18:32pm

re: #589 Dianna

You miss the point.

Seriously, there is no basis for respecting sharia law, because every single basis conflicts with the notion of equality of every individual before the law.

Muslims are free to enter contracts - under existing Western law. If they want to create a loan contract that doesn't have interest - but still mandates that a certain amount be paid above the principal - they sure as hell can.

There is no reason to even begin to allow the camel's breath to begin fluttering the unsecured edge of the tent. Just say no. The assumptions underlying sharia bear no resemblance to equal justice, and therefore, they are illegitimate.

Yet in a free state, we have no business saying that we will allow contract terms derived from some systems but not others, where the terms are compatible with existing law.

What exactly do you propose that we say 'no' to, and without using the term Sharia?

623 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:18:43pm

Killian, you will appreciate this Irish proverb.

An Irishman's Philosophy
In life, there are only two things to worry about—
Either you are well or you are sick.
If you are well, there is nothing to worry about,
But if you are sick, there are only two things to worry about—
Either you will get well or you will die.
If you get well, there is nothing to worry about,
But if you die, there are only two things to worry about—
Either you will go to heaven or hell.
If you go to heaven, there is nothing to worry about.
And if you go to hell, you’ll be so busy shaking hands with all your friends
You won’t have time to worry!

Makes more sense than the View.

Good night all...time for bed.

624 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:18:49pm

re: #608 Cognito

Not unless English common law is enforced.

Sharia has to be rejected, not treated as an indulgence for an aggrieved minority.

625 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:18:52pm

re: #615 Dianna

That's contract law, like consenting to binding arbitration.

Frankly, though, I'd dismantle that in a heartbeat.

It makes me uncomfortable, too. I'm leaning toward "one land, one law," period.

There is no way to keep people from setting up and following intercultural contracts. But you can always offer them recourse to the law of the land, and in these examples that's not the case.

626 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:20:39pm

re: #621 TalkinKamel

You've got that right!

I write as the toad under the harrow; I know where every sword-point goes!

627 RememberSekhmet?  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:21:13pm

Ooh, new thread!

628 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:21:17pm

re: #625 Cognito

It makes me uncomfortable, too. I'm leaning toward "one land, one law," period.

There is no way to keep people from setting up and following intercultural contracts. But you can always offer them recourse to the law of the land, and in these examples that's not the case.

Um... I meant 'intracultural.'

Although inter- could get pretty interesting, pretty quick.

629 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:23:21pm

re: #590 MajorPribluda
OY. "So how do we possibly disagree with the proposition that citizens may enter into legally binding contracts, so long as the terms of those contracts do not violate existing law?"
Because existing Sharia law permits Muslims to enter into contracts which are in fact prohibited by English law regarding individual CONSENT and the three underpinnings of consent are age, mental capacity and non-coercion.

630 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:24:45pm

re: #611 Dianna

Don't be silly!

Sharia doesn't treat each person as equal.

That's the first, last, best and only reason to reject it!

And yet contract cases where the validity of the contract is in dispute are not tried on the basis of whether or not Sharia law is worth a damn. The cases are tried on the basis of the terms of the contract either conflicting with existing law or not.

I reject Sharia law, outright. but I cannot require all of my countrymen to do so. I can only fight a legal battle on legal terms. I recommend that we do so before we find ourselves fighting it on terms very disadvantageous to our side.

631 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:25:01pm

re: #622 MajorPribluda

Ah! Semantics!

Essentially, if two private individuals decide to create a contract that a lawyer draws up and a court would enforce - that happens to be compliant with their understanding of sharia law - that's absolutely fine. But they can't cite sharia in support of it in court, because it's not a legal system that even begins to comply with Western law.

That would stop that particular appeal to authority - and the growth of a parallel and unequal and oppressive and unjust - dead.

I'd prefer it was stated explicitly, but I'll settle for just ignoring it or laughing it out of court.

But under no circumstances is sharia to be the authority. None.

632 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:26:17pm

re: #625 Cognito

Well, as I live and breathe! You actually have come to a perfectly obvious conclusion after how many posts and how much argument?

633 Dianna  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:28:20pm

Oh. I'm talking to myself.

Well, at least it guarantees that I'll have resounding agreement!

634 realwest  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:28:56pm

Well it's been interesting tonight, if not particularly grand, but I am off to sleep.
I hope you all have a GREAT EVENING.EARLY MORNING and that I get the chance to see you down the road.

OH, and to all American Lizards: Happy Independence Day.
TO all British Lizards: sorry about that!

635 Mich-again  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:29:06pm

re: #625 Cognito

But you can always offer them recourse to the law of the land, and in these examples that's not the case.

I think of a battered woman who refuses to press charges against her husband. Back in the day, the police used to say Oh well, have a nice day. Nowadays though, the Courts recognize that and the wifebeater can get charged even if his wife refuses to press charges. Thats my main gripe with using Sharia to settle disputes. The women aren't truly free to make their own decision and take a stand for themselves. That is why this is a bad idea for the UK or any other Nation pondering this concept.

When Islam puts women on equal footing with men, maybe then. But all of the Islamic experts will tell you the Koran is what it is and modern man can not interpret it any differently. So they and their barbaric system should be hoisted with their own petard. If the Koran is the authority then Islam should not be given any credence whatsoever in a modern court system.

636 jorline  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:31:40pm

re: #633 Dianna

Oh. I'm talking to myself.

Well, at least it guarantees that I'll have resounding agreement!

Total agreement

You've fought the good battle Dianna, now it's time for peace and rest.

Good night

637 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:31:42pm

re: #524 Killian Bundy

Killian, that was my realistic, hands-on solution.

However these women are forced to live in their countries, once they come to America, or Britain, or the Western world, they live under our laws, and, no, we don't change our laws to please their demented menfolk, or keep them coddled in their own twisted world view, where they see themselves as little better than animals. Maybe they like---or, more likely, are resigned---to life under shari'a; okay, but I, as a free westerner, can not, and will not, be complicit in their oppression. I will not support Western laws being changed to protect barbaric Islamic "family values." If Moslems themselves, whether male or female, don't like this, then they can leave and live in an Islamic country.

(And, speaking of hands-on, realistic solutions, this giving in to Islam, and Shari'a law, is damaging to Western women. Look at the rise of rape in places like France, and Scandinavia, where non-Islamic women have been attacked for not going veiled? Must Western women accept Shari'a and be oppressed, just because some Moslem women claim they're happy under it, and it's somehow mean to contradict their brainwashed world view, therefore Western women must knuckle under as well, lest they disturb Moslem womens' "happiness"? We can't just keep giving in, and giving in, to Islam. If that makes some Islamic women unhappy---too bad!)

638 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:33:15pm

re: #613 sparrowlake

Bullshit.
Sharia law is inherently incompatible with essential Western values. It therefore cannot be allowed.
If there was a Nazi community in England which wanted to have its own courts to adjudicate upon disputes between Nazis over what colour to use to spray-paint swastikas on synagogues, would you support that too?

Let me just tear down your pathetic little attack:

IF somehow there were a sizeable community of Nazis living in London (say), and
IF they agitated for their own court system, and
IF they wanted to spray-paint swastikas on synagogues (which they would, I suppose), and
IF they needed to resolve disputes over what color of paint to use in the commission of that crime,
THEN it still doesn't change my position at all that EVERY CITIZEN HAS THE RIGHT TO ENTER CONTRACTS, SO LONG AS THE TERMS OF THOSE CONTRACTS DO NOT VIOLATE EXISTING LAW.

Your Nazi community is first off breaking the law by painting synagogues without the consent of the owner. That makes it vandalism at a minimum, and whatever additional charges may be added by Orwellian hate-crime laws would certainly apply. So if the dispute is solely about the color of paint to use in the commission of a crime, then I do not support it because it violates the limiting clause of my position.

So go tell your Nazi friends that they better not count on my support.

/That's what you get for trying to paint me with hypotheticals far too specific, in order to support your smear, but which detract from the argument you are attempting to make. Asshole.

639 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:34:51pm

re: #633 Dianna

Oh. I'm talking to myself.

Well, at least it guarantees that I'll have resounding agreement!

Women & Shariah - Dr Nazreen Nawaz (HTB) and J. Bakewell

The double teamed infidel lady cogently confronts them with the obvious for 46 minutes and yet they rebuff what we consider reality.

/call in at 35 minutes

640 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:35:20pm

re: #633 Dianna

{Dianna!}

641 Cognito  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:36:14pm

No, Dianna, I'm still reading.

I think we're in agreement, but I think we're also uncomfortably close to agreement with the Judge: intracultural contracts, if you must, but with recourse to English law.

642 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:36:58pm

re: #629 realwest

OY. "So how do we possibly disagree with the proposition that citizens may enter into legally binding contracts, so long as the terms of those contracts do not violate existing law?"
Because existing Sharia law permits Muslims to enter into contracts which are in fact prohibited by English law regarding individual CONSENT and the three underpinnings of consent are age, mental capacity and non-coercion.

Look, I'm with you, but we're not putting a door in what is otherwise a wall here. It's more like putting up a wall with a door in it, where previously there was only trespass.

643 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:37:50pm

re: #637 TalkinKamel

Killian, that was my realistic, hands-on solution.

/kind of vague if you're expecting civil servants to go forth and implement your solution Monday morning

644 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:38:09pm

re: #631 Dianna

Ah! Semantics!

Essentially, if two private individuals decide to create a contract that a lawyer draws up and a court would enforce - that happens to be compliant with their understanding of sharia law - that's absolutely fine. But they can't cite sharia in support of it in court, because it's not a legal system that even begins to comply with Western law.

That would stop that particular appeal to authority - and the growth of a parallel and unequal and oppressive and unjust - dead.

I'd prefer it was stated explicitly, but I'll settle for just ignoring it or laughing it out of court.

But under no circumstances is sharia to be the authority. None.

Agreed.

645 MajorPribluda  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:39:40pm

re: #634 realwest

Well it's been interesting tonight, if not particularly grand, but I am off to sleep.
I hope you all have a GREAT EVENING.EARLY MORNING and that I get the chance to see you down the road.

OH, and to all American Lizards: Happy Independence Day.
TO all British Lizards: sorry about that!

MSM Headline:

America Issues Belated Internet Apology for Revolution, War. (War Crimes Tribunal to be held in Hague, page A12)

646 NY Nana  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:40:08pm

If only they could clone Mark Steyn...My Sharia Amour...

'Run this by me again," I said as we circled Lagos Airport. "We're doing a new 'culturally sensitive' Miss World?"
"That's right," said Julia Morley. "I got the idea from all those stringy London feminists droning on about how we're only promoting a narrow exploitative Western image of women. And to be honest, after a week in England listening to their bitching and whining, I'm glad to be back in Nigeria. The locals'll go crazy for this."
"I hope not," I said. But I was pleasantly surprised as we taxied down the runway. "Look, Julia, a gun salute!" "Duck, girls!" she yelled, as a SAM missile pierced the window, shot through the First Class curtain and took out the Economy toilet.
"Now don't you worry, Mark," she said once we were safely in the limo. "Your material's hardly been changed at all. Just remember, when you and Tony Orlando do Thank Heaven For Little Girls, there's a Sudanese warlord in a Row Three aisle seat who's got a new 12-year-old wife you don't want to be caught looking at."
"Got it," I said. The house band, made up entirely of Hausa band members, played the opening strains of Stevie Wonder's classic love song and Julia pushed the revised culturally sensitive lyrics into my hand. It was then that the first nagging doubts began to gnaw at the back of my mind. But what the hell, I was in my tux and they were playing my song.
I bounced out on stage, grabbed the mike and punched the air:
"My Sharia Amour, good enough for some emir
My Sharia Amour, I'm the guy you like to fear"

The audience seemed wary and an alarming number appeared to be reaching into their robes. But I ploughed on:
"My Sharia Amour, pretty little girl in your chador.
One of only four that I beat sore
How I wish that I had five."
There was a momentary silence, just long enough for me to start backing upstage nervously. And then the crowd went wild! The guys in the balcony cheered deliriously and hurled their machetes across the orchestra pit, shredding my pants. An Afghan wedding party grabbed their semi-automatics and blew out the chandeliers, sending them hurtling to the aisle, where they killed a Japanese camera crew. Tough luck, fellers, but that's what happens when you get between me and my audience.
I took my usual seat with the celebrity judges, in between Baywatch hunk David Hasselhoff and Princess Michael of Kent. Lorraine Kelly said: "And now, ladies and gentlemen, let's give our panel a really big hand!" A really big hand landed on the table with a dull thud, courtesy of a Saudi prince in the Royal box.
"How'd they like you?" I asked Princess Michael.
"Well, by the end of Man, I Feel Like A Woman, I had the crowd with me all the way. But I shook 'em off at Kaduna."
"Who's the bloke next to you?"
"Oh, he's a judge."
I rolled my eyes. "Well, duh!"
"No, I mean, he's a real judge. He's some Fulani bigshot who's here to decide who gets stoned."
"And which mother of a Mick Jagger love-child is it this year?"
"That's Marsha Hunt. Had an affair with him in the late Sixties."
The small talk was somewhat stilted. "Have you ever been stoned?" asked the judge. Marsha tittered.
Princess Michael explained that the fellow on Marsha's left was Alhaji Abdutayo Ogunbati, the country's leading female circumcisionist, there to ensure every contestant was in full compliance, and next to him was Hans Blix, there to ensure every involuntary clitorectomy was in accordance with UN regulations.
I glanced at my watch. "For crying out loud, when are they going to raise the curtain?"
"They have raised the curtain," said David. "Those are the girls." I peered closer at the shapeless line of cloth, and he was right: there they all were, from Miss Afghanistan to Miss Zionist Entity.[...]


Read it all!

647 TalkinKamel  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 10:54:21pm

re: #643 Killian Bundy

Well, actually no, I wasn't. (Where on earth did you get that from?) I think civil servants trying to be useful, and make everybody happy, are a big part of our problem at the moment. My solution is that we don't give in on matters such as establishing Shari'a into law. If any Moslems, male or female, don't like it, they can leave. There's no use working out the details, if you don't even know what you're working for (and, of course, the details are always going to change.)

I think one good, hands-on thing would be cut down, or eliminate altogether, all those helpful civil servant types who encourage Moslems to see themselves as victims, and help them set up their own, separate communities.

Seriously, what's your solution? Keep giving in, because, after all, Moslem women are really happy? Ignore the fact that Moslems are trying to set up an alternate social system within our society, because, after all, it's what many Moslem women really want, and who are we to argue with them?

Many people used to argue that black slaves were happy, down on the plantation, and some of them may at least have been content, or they preferred staying in the only home they'd ever known, too trying to make a dangerous run for it to freedom, and the north. Should slavery have continued, because these people were, after all, "happy"? (Or, at least not making any trouble for anybody.)

648 Killian Bundy  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 11:00:37pm

re: #647 TalkinKamel

Seriously, what's your solution?

Glad you asked.

/effectively neutering Iran solves well over 90% of the current world problems, get 'er done, sooner than later

649 desertbrat  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 11:04:13pm

#561 Noam Sayin'

no...I don't think so.

650 desertbrat  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 11:23:21pm

#592 Noam Sayin'
#575 realwest

Mescal is good and I'm a girl...

651 Hard Right  Thu, Jul 3, 2008 11:27:08pm

re: #650 desertbrat

#592 Noam Sayin'
#575 realwest

Mescal is good and I'm a girl...

Girls are brats too. :)

652 MrBlonde21  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:06:03am

My knee jerks along with most of the people on here but think about this for a second.

"Those entering into a contractual agreement can agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.....as long as punishments - and divorce rulings - complied with the law of the land."

If two people mutual agree upon any contract, I say they should be bound by it whether it relates to business or religion or whatever. In principle, this judge made the right decision.

Many of you are being prejudice and don't even realize it.

653 Abu Lahab  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:21:31am

re: #652 MrBlonde21

What a jungle then it will be if every two parties made their own law and agreement, not to mention that in case of Shria violates every basic human rights.
This is the most ignorant comment I have read recently on LGF.

654 Hard Right  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:24:46am

re: #652 MrBlonde21

My knee jerks along with most of the people on here but think about this for a second.

"Those entering into a contractual agreement can agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.....as long as punishments - and divorce rulings - complied with the law of the land."

If two people mutual agree upon any contract, I say they should be bound by it whether it relates to business or religion or whatever. In principle, this judge made the right decision.

Many of you are being prejudice and don't even realize it.

Yes, how dare we have a problem with sharia law since it relegates women and non muslims to sub-human status. Idiot.

655 Abu Lahab  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:32:09am

re: #654 Hard Right

It's "prejudice"! I mean what else but prejudice when you do not agree with public beheading, stoning, polygamy, ill-treatment of women ,Jihad, and the rest of this well-known list. He understands though this "cultural" issues!

656 splat  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:36:07am

I guess England decided to accept new masters without a fight this time, if you bow low enough perhaps they won't beat you too harshly.

The spirit of Lord Halifax lives on !

Next stage in this whole game will be for 'cuturally sensitive' areas to be governed by their own laws more in line with the local community, just a little regional autonomy. aka. Islamic states within a state.

657 Hard Right  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:49:22am

re: #655 Abu Lahab

It's "prejudice"! I mean what else but prejudice when you do not agree with public beheading, stoning, polygamy, ill-treatment of women ,Jihad, and the rest of this well-known list. He understands though this "cultural" issues!

Years ago when I went to a community college, I remember one individual in particular. On the video games in the cafeteria he'd enter the initials PLO.
Saw his wife pick him up. He made her get out and become the passenger so he could drive. I have never, ever, seen a woman look so utterly broken in spirit before or since. I thought I couldn't loathe him more until that moment.

658 Killian Bundy  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 1:25:29am

The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway

/you willl want all there is to be had

659 shanec99  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 4:23:24am

re: #653 Abu Lahab

Are you suggesting that if two people signs a contract to rape little girls it would be OK?

Surely you jest.

The implications of individuals adopying practices that violate national laws without restraint would mean anarchy.

660 docremulac  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 4:56:40am

Trying to figure out why England's pretty much lost the will to survive. I've boiled it down to three theories:

1- Many of the men with any balls got killed in WW1 and WW2. All the "sensitive intellectuals" (pathetic wimps) stayed home and were left alive to breed, assuming they could find women who would tolerate them wimpering like puppies during sex.

2- Decades of living under a nanny state has squelched any desire for accomplishment like, ohhh, staying alive for instance.

3- Something else.

661 DJ Wahaba  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 5:46:13am

re: #660 docremulac

I think I can help you with the something else thing mate:
After WWII the post colonialism age gave birth to the self lashing behavior of the Europeans. Feeling bad about what their countries have done centuries earlier, they have decided to take the fast lane to suicide, not only regretting the past but sincerely rejecting any connection to their roots (like BHO does). I don't remember who said it but... HE WHO HAS NO PAST HAS NO FUTURE (like the New Age Post Communism Movement).

Second, They have turned their approach to new cultures and believes in a 180 degrees manner, instead of rejecting them all together they have adopted a "Multi Culti" structure of society, saying that the last can benefit from the entrance of new ideas, without taking in consideration: the diversity of the groups and hence, a possible conflict between them; The unwillingness of some to integrate; The strategy of some groups to takeover the country using it's own democratic structure base on the choice of the majority in the population (which the Muslims will achieve i some countries in the near future).

What say you?

662 unclassifiable  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 7:37:48am

I gotta a picture of this guy's disease!

I know America has moonbat judges but they aren't in control unless Obama gets elected.

663 lifeofthemind  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 7:51:56am

Speeches like this Judge made serve as recruiting boons for the extreme right of the BNP or depress voters enough to stay home. The conspiracy theory angle would be to call this an attempt by the left to split the conservative vote.

664 TalkinKamel  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 7:56:52am

re: #648 Killian Bundy

A good start, but that still leaves Saudi Arabia, Hamas, Hizbollah and the entire PLO community, being supported by European and our tax dollars.

665 TalkinKamel  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 8:02:44am

And here's an article from jihad watch about why British law is not going to be such a great defense here: [Link: www.jihadwatch.org...]

666 Brutus  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 8:12:03am
as long as punishments - and divorce rulings - complied with the law of the land.

This caveat, if applied, effectively renders Sharia law useless. Still, I do not like it. Societies should be governed by one, not two, sets of laws.

667 J.S.  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 8:33:04am

re: #661 DJ Wahaba

And, might add, the whole bit about colonialism and guilt -- that whole guilt trip might not even be necessary to get the spineless to cave into Islamification. Note Canada, for example -- no history here of colonialism, yet not that long ago Ontario was ready to concede to Sharia law. By the slimiest of margins, that exercise (fortunately) failed. (but it's bound to come up yet again, imo).

Sometimes one does need to wonder about those living in the West...and what's happened -- or how does one get a jellyfish to grow a backbone...

Oh, I also note -- even on this thread there are the usual defeatists...the ones who'll gladly and loudly proclaim -- "Don't worry, be Happy! It's not a problem!" Just pass the buck, let somebody else take care of the problem. (just as the teaching of creationism in public schools is "not a problem" -- just let somebody else fix it -- Yeah, let's all wait a decade for the Supreme Court decision, and hope for the best. Meanwhile local school boards may bankrupted, textbooks re-written, and a decade of school children misdirected in their science education -- but not to worry -- hey, be happy!)

668 Shr_Nfr  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 8:50:53am

I demand that I be allowed to use the "Law of the Wild West" to settle any disputes I have with anyone. If I don't like what you do, I pull out my 1911 and leave holes in your body.

/sarc

669 gman  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 9:10:39am

re: #661 DJ Wahaba

I think I can help you with the something else thing mate:
After WWII the post colonialism age gave birth to the self lashing behavior of the Europeans. Feeling bad about what their countries have done centuries earlier, they have decided to take the fast lane to suicide, not only regretting the past but sincerely rejecting any connection to their roots (like BHO does). I don't remember who said it but... HE WHO HAS NO PAST HAS NO FUTURE (like the New Age Post Communism Movement).

Second, They have turned their approach to new cultures and believes in a 180 degrees manner, instead of rejecting them all together they have adopted a "Multi Culti" structure of society, saying that the last can benefit from the entrance of new ideas, without taking in consideration: the diversity of the groups and hence, a possible conflict between them; The unwillingness of some to integrate; The strategy of some groups to takeover the country using it's own democratic structure base on the choice of the majority in the population (which the Muslims will achieve i some countries in the near future).

What say you?

The Nanny States of Europe sacrifice the individual for the sake of the collective. It's hard for Europeans to imagine that they as individuals have the power to make change when many of them were born into welfare states that take at a minimum 40% of their income each year. The influence of government in the life of a European is so pervasive in fact that many believe the "be anything you want to be" American dream is an opiate foisted on the masses by our own government. They cannot even begin to imagine the level of individual rights that we enjoy.

So, what is the answer? Whenever Europeans vote, it is important that they vote for representatives that want to reduce taxation on individuals and corporations. Through the ballot box, Europeans can push government out of their lives and let them determine their own futures. I know if a European read this last paragraph they would have a hard time seeing how they, by themselves, would be able to make such a difference, but that is exactly the type of thinking that needs to change, and it needs to start somewhere.

670 uptight  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 9:47:29am

Flipping Heck Charles - way to distort what this guy actually said!

Reading just the LGF headline, I'd be looking out for public beheadings in Hyde Park and adulteresses hanging from the Tower of London while dishdasha-clad cockneys fling stones at them.

In face, all he seems to be saying is that mutually held religious beliefs can be a factor in sorting out a dispute if both parties agree to it.

Nothing wrong with that.

In fact Lord Phillips totally ruled out any possibility of "Sharia Courts" saying:

"There can be no question of such courts sitting in this country, or such sanctions being applied here.

"So far as the law is concerned, those who live in this country are governed by English and Welsh law and subject to the jurisdiction of the English and Welsh courts."

But I guess mentioning that would rather piss on the chips of the handful of redneck LGF Brit-haters.

671 TalkinKamel  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 10:01:54am

re: #670 uptight

Heck, son, nothing us ignorant, Christianista, redneck nascar-lovin' Americans like better 'n pissin' on some limey chips!

(And happy Fourth of July to you, too!)

672 Cognito  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 10:03:07am

re: #670 uptight


But I guess mentioning that would rather piss on the chips of the handful of redneck LGF Brit-haters.

There are a number of us who have take a somewhat more thoughtful approach. (And earned reproach.)

673 Sharmuta  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 10:08:58am

re: #670 uptight

But I guess mentioning that would rather piss on the chips of the handful of redneck LGF Brit-haters.

Oh- so because, as a woman, I feel shari'a contracts in your country would be harmful to other women, I must automatically hate the English? I think it's clear that it's the other way around- you and your fellow europeans just keep nursing your anti-American resentments.

And lucky you- you have Cognito on your side. What a ringing endorsement!

674 DJ Wahaba  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 10:13:18am

re: #667 J.S.

re: #669 gman

Gman, I can't agree with you more, the Europeans can make the wished chance by voting, the sole obstacle is the demography in Europe: the immigrants to Europe were a handful 30 years ago and today they are a voting group that can tilt the election to this side or the other (In Sweden they were 1000 in 1970 and in 2006 more than half a million!); now this with the ever diminishing birth rate of the Europeans has condemned them to be subjected to a demographic takeover.

Just think what would have been with Israel if the Palestinians would have accepted the offer to become citizens... Today it Were truly Palestine!

So basically the problem is the Egoism and Hedonism of the Europeans, because... why make children? there are enough in the world as is and they cost too much. I think they don't feel they need to fight because they don't have they "far sight " to acknowledge the results of their deeds (or maybe the lack of them) in the not so far future.

675 DJ Wahaba  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 10:25:34am

re: #670 uptight

Can't you see?

This is exactly the behavior that will bring us to our destruction; instead of abolish such an idea from the start the guy (any guy in that matter that is' some how connected to politics and needs to fill the second he gets on the T/V/ screen with mumblings and words) says something "worth showing" and a second after says the almost opposite. When he does have to make his mind he passes the responsibility on to a comity; great, now we have more people, who can't or won't make up their mind.

Such behavior has earned us a quasi nuclear Iran and a the true incompetence of our politicians and judges.

676 J.S.  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 10:39:23am

re: #670 uptight

Oh, all righty then -- let us all bow down to Lord Phillips! Ja. Whatever the "lord and master" decrees, why it must so! Why that's just sooo, what? European? British? yeah, and why don't you kiss his ass while you're at it, eh?

677 Sharmuta  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 10:49:00am

re: #672 Cognito

There are a number of us who have take a somewhat more thoughtful approach.

Excuse me, but I thought your approach was "devil's advocate".

678 gman  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 11:01:49am

re: #674 DJ Wahaba

re: #669 gman

Gman, I can't agree with you more, the Europeans can make the wished chance by voting, the sole obstacle is the demography in Europe: the immigrants to Europe were a handful 30 years ago and today they are a voting group that can tilt the election to this side or the other (In Sweden they were 1000 in 1970 and in 2006 more than half a million!); now this with the ever diminishing birth rate of the Europeans has condemned them to be subjected to a demographic takeover.

Just think what would have been with Israel if the Palestinians would have accepted the offer to become citizens... Today it Were truly Palestine!

So basically the problem is the Egoism and Hedonism of the Europeans, because... why make children? there are enough in the world as is and they cost too much. I think they don't feel they need to fight because they don't have they "far sight " to acknowledge the results of their deeds (or maybe the lack of them) in the not so far future.

America is a land of massive immigration but we make our immigrants earn their keep. They know the safety net we have here is not enough to put shelter over their head and food on the table, so they go out and work, becoming an integrated part of society. Once they become vested in our society, they become more interested in political affairs, knowing that politics plays an important role in the future of their own lives. This is where i feel LGF plays a role. We fight the war of ideas. Only through knowledge and reason can we convince people of what makes this country great and give them ideas on how they too can be a part of its future.

679 uptight  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 11:59:33am

re: #676 J.S.

Oh, all righty then -- let us all bow down to Lord Phillips! Ja. Whatever the "lord and master" decrees, why it must so! Why that's just sooo, what? European? British? yeah, and why don't you kiss his ass while you're at it, eh?

Why don't you go kiss the arse of the Supreme Court judges? I think you owe it to them after they've kindly splashed out your taxes on legal aid for inhabitants of Camp Gitmo.

shit kicker

680 uptight  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:02:55pm

re: #675 DJ Wahaba

Can't you see?

This is exactly the behavior that will bring us to our destruction; instead of abolish such an idea from the start the guy (any guy in that matter that is' some how connected to politics and needs to fill the second he gets on the T/V/ screen with mumblings and words) says something "worth showing" and a second after says the almost opposite. When he does have to make his mind he passes the responsibility on to a comity; great, now we have more people, who can't or won't make up their mind.

Such behavior has earned us a quasi nuclear Iran and a the true incompetence of our politicians and judges.

bullshit

He's said nothing controversial at all. It was an empty statement. Make-believe feel goodery for the [bigoted word]s (no doubt ass kissing), but no legal substance.

681 DJ Wahaba  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:03:35pm

re: #679 uptight

As Golda Meir once said: YOU'RE NOT VERY NICE.

682 DJ Wahaba  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:06:54pm

re: #678 gman

I totally agree. The question is: Are they willing to listen?

In this case... Hope for the best, but expect...

683 uptight  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:13:56pm

re: #673 Sharmuta

Oh- so because, as a woman, I feel shari'a contracts in your country would be harmful to other women, I must automatically hate the English?

well no

I'm talking about the knuckle draggers that take every single opportunity to have a pop at the Brits (as if America's shit didn't stink).

As for Muslim women suffering under sharia contracts - Muslim women are already suffering under sharia and wider Muslim culture. This judge was not saying that Sharia should subsume British law. He was saying that mutually held beliefs should be an ambient factor in arguing a case. I'm almost certain that this is the case already.

So why should he state it? In short this judge was saying nice things to kiss Muslim arse, while actually giving NOTHING substantial.

Perhaps I shouldn't say that too loud - they might realise.

684 uptight  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:15:32pm

re: #671 TalkinKamel

Heck, son, nothing us ignorant, Christianista, redneck nascar-lovin' Americans like better 'n pissin' on some limey chips!

(And happy Fourth of July to you, too!)

well I wasn't talking about every American (of course) - just a few asshats who know who they are

still - if the glove fits....

685 TalkinKamel  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:16:22pm

re: #681 DJ Wahaba

LOL!

686 TalkinKamel  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:18:00pm

re: #684 uptight

Heh---whatever. (Not, I suspect, that much of anybody cares what sort of Americans you do approve of.)

687 TalkinKamel  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 12:21:11pm

re: #683 uptight

Uppie, they're gonna realize it, sooner or later. In fact, I think they've already realized just how far they can push Britain, and guys like this judge (who is too prominent a figure to be shooting off his mouth like this, if he's really not serious).

It's not us Redneck, Christianista, Nascar-loving Americans who are the problem.

688 J.S.  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 1:10:23pm

re: #683 uptight

Oh no! Indeed, as you yourself say, "Perhaps I shouldn't say that too loud - they [as in Muslims? your new-found iover lords] might realise! Heavens Forfend! My, you might just insult someone! Better get back to that ass kissing right quick, now! Don't want get out of line now do you?

/typical slave mentality
/pathetic, truly pathetic and on America's Independence Day! Hooray For America ! ! G-d Bless America! Land of the Brave! Home of the Free!

689 niallster  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 2:00:38pm

Mel as always nails it.

[Link: www.spectator.co.uk...]

690 Cognito  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 5:27:38pm

re: #677 Sharmuta

Excuse me, but I thought your approach was "devil's advocate".

And thoughtful, I hope.

691 TalkinKamel  Fri, Jul 4, 2008 11:13:37pm

Thoughtful? Not really, no. . .


This entry has been archived.
Comments are closed.

^ back to top ^

log in
Name:
Pass:

Register Forgot Your Password? My Account Re-send Confirmation (To log in, cookies must be enabled in your browser!)

► LGF Headlines

► Top 10 Comments

► Bottom Comments

► Recent Comments

► Tools/Info

► LGF Hits

► Slideshows

► Resources

► Never Forget

► Statistics

► Tag Cloud

► Contact

You must have Javascript enabled to use the contact form.
Your email:

Subject:

Message:


Messages may be published in our weblog, unless you request otherwise.
Tech Note:
Using the Contact Form

► News/Opinion

Audiobook MP3s
More Partners

Compare Electricity Prices in your area. Texas Electricity is deregulated; you have the right to choose Texas Electric Rates from among many Texas Electric Companies.

Helping moonbats sleep soundly.


Save 40% on The Lost Symbol by Dan Brown
Blockbuster_TotalAccess 50% off