Pages

Jump to bottom

7 comments

1 Political Atheist  Tue, Aug 17, 2010 8:38:02am

Obama is a natural single term guy. As natural as a terrible economy. Or poor results in Afghanistan. Remember of 41st President? Liberated Kuwait, got spending limits in and lost the election. Imagining Obama as a one term guy is as reasonable as can be. If you ever observed any previous one term Presidents anyway.

Recession can kill an administration, and many DC careers.

2 reine.de.tout  Tue, Aug 17, 2010 8:39:28am

That article doesn’t make any sense. Quoting a couple of paragraphs:

So on Friday night, he said: “As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan in accordance with local laws and ordinances.”

See what I mean about not getting it?

John Feehery, a Republican consultant, told Sheryl Gay Stolberg of The New York Times, “This is not a unifying decision on his part; he chose a side. I understand why he did this, but politically I think it’s a blunder.”

I don’t see that Obama chose “a side” on this at all. There really isn’t a “side” on the mosque issue, except the one invented by some idiots.

Another portion of the article:

A candidate says, as Bobby Kennedy did, “Some men look at things the way they are and ask why? I dream of things that are not and ask why not?”

A president says: “What do the polls say?”

ehhhh, what?
IIRC, lotsa folks were upset with Clinton for over-reliance on “the polls”.

Lotsa those same folks were pleased as punch with Bush for what they saw as NOT relying on the polls.

Now, when it’s convenient for this particular bunch, they say the President should be relying on the polls?

I’m not quite getting the point.

3 reine.de.tout  Tue, Aug 17, 2010 8:41:10am

re: #1 Rightwingconspirator

Obama is a natural single term guy. As natural as a terrible economy. Or poor results in Afghanistan. Remember of 41st President? Liberated Kuwait, got spending limits in and lost the election. Imagining Obama as a one term guy is as reasonable as can be. If you ever observed any previous one term Presidents anyway.

Recession can kill an administration, and many DC careers.

Honestly - I don’t see Obama as a one-termer. For one thing, the R’s have no one reasonable that can be put into the running. I just don’t see ‘em finding anyone in time (like, now).

4 avanti  Tue, Aug 17, 2010 10:10:01am

re: #2 reine.de.tout

That article doesn’t make any sense. Quoting a couple of paragraphs:

I don’t see that Obama chose “a side” on this at all. There really isn’t a “side” on the mosque issue, except the one invented by some idiots.

Another portion of the article:

ehhh, what?
IIRC, lotsa folks were upset with Clinton for over-reliance on “the polls”.

Lotsa those same folks were pleased as punch with Bush for what they saw as NOT relying on the polls.

Now, when it’s convenient for this particular bunch, they say the President should be relying on the polls?

I’m not quite getting the point.

I think you are missing the point that the piece was being sarcastic and a slap at selling out the intellectually honest for the expedient. I think the point was that Obama spoke out for the right position even though it was unpopular.

5 reine.de.tout  Tue, Aug 17, 2010 2:00:31pm

re: #4 avanti

I think you are missing the point that the piece was being sarcastic and a slap at selling out the intellectually honest for the expedient. I think the point was that Obama spoke out for the right position even though it was unpopular.

Ah. Prolly so.

6 captdiggs  Tue, Aug 17, 2010 8:07:34pm

re: #3 reine.de.tout

Honestly - I don’t see Obama as a one-termer. For one thing, the R’s have no one reasonable that can be put into the running. I just don’t see ‘em finding anyone in time (like, now).

Barring the improbability that it’s Palin or someone like her. I don’t see Obama getting past 2012.
1) The economy. Nearly every economist is now saying this malaise will go on for years to come
2) He will not have the enthusiasm of the left, nor will he have the independents ( who are the the swing vote that now are swinging to the right of Obama).
3) Foreign policy. Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan are looking too good. And Iran will be the most important issue. If they develop a bomb, he’s toast.
The US would be looking at a stale economy AND a new nuclear threat.

7 reine.de.tout  Tue, Aug 17, 2010 8:15:34pm

re: #6 captdiggs

It will be interesting!


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2021-06-05 2:51 pm PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds Tweet

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app Shop at amazon
as an LGF Associate!
Recent PagesClick to refresh
How to Keep Vets From Being Seduced by Extremists The training many of our military people get is damn dangerous if abused or put to criminal use once one returns to civilian life. That "battlefield to home" transition IMO can make some people extra vulnerable to extremist messaging ...
Rightwingconspirator
3 hours, 48 minutes ago
Views: 71 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 0
Tweets: 0 •
Top Three Images of the Past YearAt least, I think so right now... ;) Ask me tomorrow for probably 7 others. Thanks for looking!
William Lewis
4 days, 21 hours ago
Views: 379 • Comments: 4 • Rating: 6
Tweets: 1 •
Justice Dept Sues Uber for Price Gouging the Disabled With “Wait Times”Justice Department Sues Uber for Overcharging People With Disabilities The Justice Department today filed a lawsuit against Uber Technologies Inc. (Uber) for charging “wait time” fees to passengers who, because of disability, need more time to enter a car. Uber’s ...
Thanos
2 weeks, 5 days ago
Views: 1,769 • Comments: 0 • Rating: 1
Tweets: 2 •