Pages

Jump to bottom

13 comments

1 researchok  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 10:43:41am

Raimundo is the picture of vile.

See Adam Holland's Justin Raimondo's racism:

Excerpt:


There he explains that Jews and/or "Asiatics" have a...

...savage mind... (which) works differently. Shorn of what we would recognize as a moral sense, the savage glories in his capacity for pitiless violence. It’s a survival mechanism: in his world, red in tooth and claw, instilling fear in your opponent means winning more than half the battle. As a survival strategy, it’s like the one inmate who mutters ominously to himself while exhibiting all the characteristics of a violent psychotic: the other prisoners give him plenty of space because they think he’s liable to do anything.

2 Michael Orion Powell  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 11:08:25am

I have much sympathy for those that don't want America as the global policeman or criticized the military industrial complex, as President Eisenhower did. However, and this is a big however, the John Birch Society and their forebears like Walt Disney and Charles Lindbergh were not good people. The Birchers were convinced Eisenhower was a communist (an assertion so ridiculous it's hard to believe someone made it). Walt Disney and Charles Lindbergh weren't "anti-war" or even "America first," no matter what the hell they called themselves. They were anti-semites and racists of the first order. A rebirth of their lot is a sign that America is getting worse.

3 Michael Orion Powell  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 11:10:26am

re: #1 researchok

Sounds like he was doing a bit of projecting in that book.

If you ever read The Great Gatsby, there's passages where someone at a dinner party makes remarks of racial paranoia. That stuff was commonplace back in the 1920s. It'll be commonplace again thanks to the Tea Party.

4 Michael McBacon  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 11:16:37am

re: #1 researchok

It wouldn't surprise me if Raimondo were a member of the Christian Identity movement.

5 Michael Orion Powell  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 1:01:47pm

Can we please not call these people anti-war? Lindbergh and his lot encouraged and allied with genocide.

6 wrenchwench  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 1:46:51pm

re: #5 OrionXP

Can we please not call these people anti-war? Lindbergh and his lot encouraged and allied with genocide.

It is difficult to find people and organizations that are anti-war that are not also some kind of bigot, although I am less familiar with lefty anti-war organizations. But the paleo-con and libertarian anti-war folks seem to always circle back to the R. Pauls, Murray Rothbard, and eventually to Bilderburger conspiracies. If you find some that don't, let me know.

7 Romantic Heretic  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 1:58:30pm

To me being anti-war or pro-war is like being anti-surgery or pro-surgery.

Sometimes it is something that has to be done. When it must be done it must be done quickly, with the greatest skill and the most modern equipment. Otherwise a lot of blood will be spilled for no purpose.

Also, like surgery, what happens after the job is done is at least as important as the surgery itself.

Being pro-war is like saying, "Everyone should get a triple bypass." Anti-war, "No one should ever get one." Both are silly, extreme positions.

8 Lord Baron Viscount Duke Earl Count Planckton  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 2:08:51pm

re: #7 Romantic Heretic

All this applies to abortion BTW. I don't like labels like "pro-life" referring to anti-choice people. I'm pro-life, I'm just pro-choice.

9 Randall Gross  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 5:23:37pm

re: #4 UNIXon

My money would be on atheist, he's a Rothbardian libtard conservative, but I've never seen him go hardcore anti-abortion like the average Paultards are prone to do.

10 Killgore Trout  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 6:39:49pm

re: #5 OrionXP

Can we please not call these people anti-war? Lindbergh and his lot encouraged and allied with genocide.

I used anti-war in thhe title because that's the name of his website. He's a fairly obscure lunatic and thought the name of his website would help with name recognition in the title

11 HappyWarrior  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 7:31:21pm

Shit if I were a Republican, I'd the Birchers for the shit they said about Eisenhower. Of course to the TPers, Eisenhower is probably seen as a "progressive" and therefore bad.

12 Fenris  Mon, Nov 29, 2010 8:02:21pm

Did a quick search on antiwar.com, and it appears that anti-Semitic favorite Pat Buchanan is a regular. How did liberals get duped into beatifying this site in the first place? The title?

13 (I Stand By What I Said Whatever It Was)  Tue, Nov 30, 2010 12:45:03am
Lindbergh

Really the archetype of so many on the "libertarian" Right right now: Beck and Napolitano also come to mind.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh